Sentences with phrase «at least understand what»

«Don't make any rash decisions, but at least understand what they are and aren't doing for you.

As for the stretched goal, it is to influence the non-investor to invest or at least understand what is investing.

If the individual decides to accept an offer of employment that contains an enforceable termination clause the individual should at least understand what he or she is signing up for.

While many states do not require this step, as a family lawyer, I recommend that everyone consider a prenuptial agreement or at least understand what your state's property laws entail upon dissolution before taking the plunge.

Better than to say they were dishonest (especially since they did point out the transformation), you at least understand what they did, have told the public in much clearer terms than they did, and can similarly use the Forster / Gregory 06 raw results to argue a different sensitivity range.

He goes on, admitting to the fact that borrowing is great, something they do «all the time,» but the Capcom game is «complete theft» and if they are going to «steal a game, you should at least understand what makes it fun.»

As for the stretched goal, it is to influence the non-investor to invest or at least understand what is investing.

Then after I left school, the world got access to Microsoft Word and all of a sudden, people could at least understand what I was trying to write.

«If you're going to outright steal a game, you should at least understand what makes it fun... borrowing is great.

«Given that it's happening, we should at least understand what the consequences might be for drug resistance,» he said.

Certainly I hope Mr. Paladino comes out with some kind of platform that I can at least understand what he truly stands for.

The beliefs are just so far out there for me, that whenever I see someone in ardent support of them I have to think they're a troll, because I don't know how they could possibly believe or accept that (there are a few exceptions of people who pt things very well, cite supporting evidence, and are consistent and coherent - I don't agree with them, but I can at least understand what they're saying)

And if I want to know what theology to read, I'm going take the word of someone who seems to at least understand what they read enough to summarize it in a meaningful way...

If you are not going to believe something can you at least understand what it is you arent believing?

These statistics are incredible, and with social media usage increasing every day, it is important to make sure you at least understand what it is and if you choose to use it with your company, what you can do with it.

Ferris Bueller was brave, the members of the The Breakfast Club at least understood what stereotype they fit in, and even Lady Bird's defiance would have been something to marvel at.

CJ: And they're international so you can find someone who maybe doesn't live close to you in person but at least understands what you're going through no matter where you live.

Not exact matches

The company used number crunching to improve its hiring process, isolate the key attributes of its highest performing teams, and even understand what makes an exceptional manager (at least one key takeaway will probably surprise you).

I had only a crude knowledge of mathematics, so I didn't understand half of what Hawking wrote, at least at first.

Who are your future customers — and competitors?While you may not be able to thoroughly test the market potential for your business concept, you should at least understand who your likely customers are and what kind of competition you would face.

I like incremental improvements or at least seeing where you're going to go and really being able to understand what's feasible at the time.

The world has caught up... I think we still have a deeper understanding of what's going on with the independent workforce relative to most of these firms that are looking at it now, but a lot of people following coworking and involved in coworking at least now understand that the trend is there.

I am not sure that what happened last week is proof of anything I've been saying, but I do think that the framework I have used over the past decade has been useful, at least to me, in understanding both the rebalancing process in China and the events that led up to the global crisis of 2007 - 08.

So if you're in a developed country and you understand what bitcoin is and you don't want charge backs and you don't want to accept credit cards, at least accept my bitcoin.

If you don't understand or at least know what a company does and how it makes money, then you will not be able to tell why the stock is going up or down, you will be at the mercy of the stock and this is a fast ticket to losing money.

«The answer may be entirely innocent,» Mr. Denton said, musing on the question of whether Mr. Harder was paid by someone other than Mr. Hogan, «but I think in order for people to understand what's going on here, what the stakes are, I think it's important that it be out in public, or at least that he'd be asked the question in public.»

If I have a better understanding of the outcome, ie, what a Scenario looks like once developed, it will give me a better handle on how to develop it, or at least a path to learn the right way how to actually develop one.

All these have an answer, it's beyond what we can understand, beyond nature; again to suggest the «super natural» ie: God, or at least Gods Mother... what came first the chicken or the egg?

At least in my own experience, as I have gotten to know people different from me, it's given me an appreciation and / or understanding for what they go through, or their culture, perspective, etc..

Finally, I will look at what I think the relationship might be into at least the immediate future of what is widely understood as our postmodern world.

Let us understand what our own selfish genes are up to, because we may then at least have the chance to upset their designs, something that no other species has ever aspired to.»

The whole deal with miracles is that by nature they can not be proven because miracles defy the laws of nature or at least what we understand to be the laws of nature.

Yet, as Mark points out, we all agree that love, etc. exist — primarily because we have a «shared experience» of them; i.e., we can «explain,» at least in basic terms that others can understand, what those things are.

If it is understood in a strongly mentalistic way, as consisting exclusively in what the agent has it in mind to do, then the agent can at least try to avoid formal cooperation by excluding from his plans the evil effects of the action he is cooperating with.

Most of all, even if we couldn't agree in what we believe, I shall have better at least a better understanding through this amicable exchange.

If two apparently contradictory passages are both true in the higher understanding, this means that at least one of them doesn't mean what it says, which means it is true (in the higher understanding) precisely because it is false (in the literal sense).

I do not know whether there would be, but at least it seems to me of the greatest importance that people should know, in terms which they can understand, what it is they are being asked to accept or reject.

so, at least be studious and intellectual and understand what is said to be going on so you can give yourself a fair shot at not lying to yourself and others.

They understand at least the theory of a congregation being a cohesive community — the «body of Christ» in New Testament terms — even if they have little sense of what they must let go of to contribute to the shape of this community.

Then, others, whether Buddhist or Hindu or Muslim, would at least be able to understand what is written.

It should be the work of Christian teachers in every generation, first, to understand the Scriptures, to distinguish what gives unity to the message of the Bible from what is peculiar to this or that writer, what is central from what is peripheral, what is essential from what is accidental; and then, on the basis of such understanding, to develop a doctrine of the act of God in Christ which will be intelligible, or at least not meaningless, to the contemporary mind.

Not practically, of course, but in spirit; not permanently and irrevocably, but at least long enough to understand what being gay or being Muslim actually entails.

If you understood the purpose of what Jesus preached about and I mean all of it, you might at least admire Jesus or him wanting do something right for humanity.

And yet modernity was also understood as a philosophical and theological system that displaced, or at least threatened, what could be called the praeambula fidei — the «preambles of faith,» which include the truths of natural reason, particularly on philosophical issues close to sacred doctrine.

If you're going to attack something for being what it is, at least try to understand the words you're using in your attack.

In seminary I heard that if you want to understand what Paul or Luke were saying in the Greek all the way, you would have to read at least 7 different translations.

At least Wilson might understand what was troubling him.

Clive, you point out how others often don't understand what Jesus was saying; but while Jesus often labors to try and make things clear to the unbeliever («Oh, you of little faith) or at the very least the author tries to make it clear for us in retrospect (At the time they didn't understand that he spoke of this...), in this case Jesus switches from something that might be figurative to essentially say «no, I seriously mean this» and it concludes not with Jesus saying «don't go away, this is what I actually mean» but confirming that people would refuse to accept that God intended for them to actually fill themselves with the life that He offered so they stopped following hiat the very least the author tries to make it clear for us in retrospect (At the time they didn't understand that he spoke of this...), in this case Jesus switches from something that might be figurative to essentially say «no, I seriously mean this» and it concludes not with Jesus saying «don't go away, this is what I actually mean» but confirming that people would refuse to accept that God intended for them to actually fill themselves with the life that He offered so they stopped following hiAt the time they didn't understand that he spoke of this...), in this case Jesus switches from something that might be figurative to essentially say «no, I seriously mean this» and it concludes not with Jesus saying «don't go away, this is what I actually mean» but confirming that people would refuse to accept that God intended for them to actually fill themselves with the life that He offered so they stopped following him.

Their whole analysis of decline hangs on a prescriptive or normative understanding of church - relatedness, and that normative understanding resembles suspiciously what the colleges were, or at least claimed to be, sometime earlier in the century, in perhaps some «golden age» of church - relatedness (and, unfortunately, often concomitant ethnic insularity and academic mediocrity).

I think my congregation might have done better — or at least might have understood what was happening — if it had received some of the information that came to the conference participants at Honolulu.