Sentences with phrase «at least understand who»

There's the hard news that I already care about and have been following long enough that I at least understand who the main players are (U.S. politics, for instance).

I have been attempting to learn Bayesian techniques sufficiently in order to apply it or at least understand those who write about its applications.

Who are your future customers — and competitors?While you may not be able to thoroughly test the market potential for your business concept, you should at least understand who your likely customers are and what kind of competition you would face.

The story in the first film was incredibly convoluted, but at least we understood who everyone was and what their motivations were.

Not exact matches

Even if you don't find employees at these industry events, you will at least make contacts who understand your needs and will put you in touch with other people they know.

Another Reddit user responded: «I understand that some people genuinely have to limit their salt intake as much as possible (McDonald's isn't really the best place to practice that sort of diet, but hey, not my life) but for me, at least, it's easy to tell who genuinely needs it salt free and who's just trying to get the freshest fries they can.»

TechCrunch understands that at least half a dozen companies who raised money via ICOs and each have $ 500 million or more in total coin market cap — i.e. the total value of all of their crypto coins — have plans to invest in other blockchain projects via seed - or early - stage style deals.

Fortunately, the type of annuity you're asking about — an immediate annuity — is (by annuity standards at least) the easiest to understand and, to my mind the type with the greatest potential for helping people who want more guaranteed lifetime income than Social Security alone will provide.

I'll be quite happy if at least stocks are being held by those who understand the full narrative of the recent half - cycle, and have seen, considered, and discarded our work.

and yeah, as we saw in regards to CDOs, sometimes even the big heads who structure those vehicles don't really understand them (but at least they are usually smart enough not to put their own money in it).

Senators — who began work on this report with the endorsement of the federal finance minister — recommend the government delay implementing any proposed changes for at least a year so that private corporations have the time to understand the impact these will have on their business.

As we did in our annual, more global study, we spent a good deal of time in this research looking at the differences between the marketers who rate themselves highly in terms of overall content marketing effectiveness (the «most effective») versus those who rate themselves as least effective to understand the gaps and identify best practices for paid content promotion.

I speak to myself often so that I know I am talking to at least one person who truly understands Jesus» truth.

Most of them said they wished, in retrospect, that they had voted for Hillary Clinton who «at least understood that the economy... it's the economy, right?

This sort of thing goes back at least to the time of St. Paul — who, I understand, had a difficult time with his parishes in Corinth and Galatia.

Anyway, maybe this material will help readers in expanding their context (or at least in understanding my opinion) on why the calling out of those who may be considered Commenders could help bring light and resolution to questions about Emergent Village system toxicity.

The man who chooses to live in our destiny can neither know the reality of God's presence nor understand the world as his creation; or, at least, he can no longer respond — either interiorly or cognitively — to the classical Christian images of the Creator and the creation.

I can understand the idea of a party as a unifier and people can group together, but the way parties are set up now, it just fuels fringe elements who don't speak for the moderates who are forced to affiliate with one of two parties in order to feel at least sort of relevant.

For evangelizing, in its essence, is taking the authentic Christian gospel (albeit with the limitations of human understanding) through word or deed to those who need it and are at least prepared enough to take a look at it.

I get all kinds of «hate mail» for loving Muslims the way I would want to be loved which is to get an understanding of Islam from people who are at least sympathetic if not ardent supporters of the faith.

Scholars who study religion and the family such as Lisa Cahill, Mark Jordan and Adrian Thatcher tend to search for common ground or at least for greater understanding of the complexities.

But to understand, at least in part, is to be strengthened in the knowledge of our own capacity for both good and evil» and of our radical dependence on the One who, despite His understanding all, forgives the penitent.

Well... I'm done reading your crappy reports and comment sections CNN, you've successfully turned another educated person away, and what do you care honestly, every time you turn away someone who understands logic and reason, you bring in 10 more lowly people with degrees from state college (I mean, «yes, they're ph.ds, but from state college??? that shouldn't really count, or at least should be considered the equivalent of a masters degree at a good school).

And if I want to know what theology to read, I'm going take the word of someone who seems to at least understand what they read enough to summarize it in a meaningful way...

Atheist who do nt have a believe at least should understand and respect that others do and not offend them.

sounds more like «corporate brainstorming», but what I was trying to suggest is that it appears that we're witnessing (not intentionally) an evolving understanding of what wd become more central to the narrative and eventually orthodox.That is, if you cdn't believe it, you were out the door.A good example wd be the higher Christology that the fourth gospel reflects and more specifically, the virgin birth which it (like Mark and Paul) doesn't mention.If the birth narratives that we're familiar with are absent from the earliest gospel and the most theological gospel that came decades later, and can only be found in the other two gospels that we know used the first, it at least suggests a growing and evolving understanding of who Jesus «was» and «is».

Then my identity no longer derives from things or from the attitudes of others but, to some degree at least, stems from a clearer understanding of the truth of my relationship to God; and this understanding can sharply decrease the fear generated by ignorance of who I really am.

Yet, on closer examination, the lives and deaths of Alba Mery Chilito Peñafiel and Alicia Castilla not only illustrate the carnage their country has endured, but also one of its least - understood aspects: Despite belonging to an overwhelming statistical majority, Christians in Colombia who stand up to the violence are remarkably at risk.

In my view there is at least today a distinct experience and teaching in Catholic theology according to which God must be understood as the all - efficient Giver who gives himself both the potency of freedom and its good act according to his grace that is neither derived nor compelled, and which nothing in man precedes.

There are at least three familiar ways, or models, to imagine the difference Jesus in his passion can make for terrible situations like that of Sam and his family: 1) evil as punishment; 2) perfection through suffering; 3) Jesus as the fellow sufferer who understands.

But I think it will challenge both those who are pro-gay and not... to understand why the desire to be right, or to at least be justified in your beliefs is so damn strong.

The reason Rabshakeh advances is ridiculous and shows in effect that the natural man has no understanding, like twentieth - century man, who finds some Protestants more acceptable because they at least do not believe in stupid miracles, in the nativity and the resurrection!

We need at least a significant minority who have tried to understand the deep history of the great cultures of the world.

Murray needs to read Alasdair MacIntyre, who doesn't have much of a solution either, but who at least understands the profundity of our cultural brokenness.

With that background in mind, they also have every right to feel a sense of insensitivity from Muslims and any other person who wouldn't at least understand them when they oppose the building of a structure that reminds them of the evil that those individuals cause on that fateful day.

Ok, let's forget about scientific explanations for a minute and turn to those people who REALLY know and understand the text of the Hebrew Bible - Orthodox Jews or, at the very least, Talmudic scholars.

I don't think anyone who's seen war or at least understands a part of it ever really wants it.

If I understand his thesis correctly, it is very similar to what I have argued here — that the Old Testament must be interpreted in light of the New and that, at least occasionally, reports in the Old Testament (about what God commanded people to do) must be relativized in light of the character of God revealed in Jesus Christ who is the Word of God in person.»

The beliefs are just so far out there for me, that whenever I see someone in ardent support of them I have to think they're a troll, because I don't know how they could possibly believe or accept that (there are a few exceptions of people who pt things very well, cite supporting evidence, and are consistent and coherent - I don't agree with them, but I can at least understand what they're saying)

It'll get the Liberal lemmings foaming at the mouth, at least the ones who understand it.

«Whatever happened to the recognition that a university education has at least three purposes: helping one understand who they are and what excites and motivates them; helping understand one's relationship to the greater world; and, also, becoming prepared for a job.»

He'll be wanted by at least 10 clubs who actually have ambition to win something and if he leaves I'd understand it.

We have to understand the fact if we spend 120 million on a 18 year old kid who looks very promising by all standards we would be looking at least for a 7 year contract.

You might not like him any more when you finish reading it, but you will at least understand him, and it's going to take understanding to fully process who he was, who he is, and who he hopes to be before his Baseball career comes to an end.

Or at least in a deep slumber, waiting to be woken by someone who can effectively write and understand her character.

The Bears and Niners had an understanding that if Chicago's man was still on the board after Cleveland picked (Chicago GM Ryan Pace wouldn't tell Lynch who Player X was; the Niners figured it was Thomas), the Bears would give at least two third - round picks to move from three to two.

Most of us were on Wenger's case until very recently seeing that we didn't understand what his overall game plan [on and off the pitch] was and we had good reason to doubt him but at least the criticisms were meant to be of a constructive nature but I fail to understand folks who come on here to spew bile even when things are finally looking up for once in a very long while.

JW not for the first time I applaud you with the article you have posted.For all you AKB, s you should note the objectiveness and argument of what JW has said and the rationale he uses to at least understand and consider other fans views, to which of course you are entitled.Me I honestly believe you are Deluded, Outdated and WRONG.Wenger would have had respect if he had gone when he KNEW it was all coming apart.This is not recent this is 7 - 8 seasons ago.But I do sympathise how difficult it must be dragging yourself through these tough tough times on # 9miilion f *** ing a year.All you AKB, s really do need to wake up to the reality of the position we are in and who is responsible for us being there.Who are you going to worship when he finally goes or are you going with him.Pathetic to even try to respond to opinion that is proved by where we are as a club.JW — WE SALUTE YOU

Yes — I don't really understand AFCON — not only is it held at least twice as often as other big international sporting events, and sometimes more, if they decide they want to change the schedule, to not interfere with something else (not the players club obligations, who pay their wages, perish the thought), but it is always held at the peak of the league season, as they say it maybe raining in summer, which I also don't get, as it rains here all the time — I'm sure there are parts of Africa which have reasonable weather during the summer — it's a big continent — South Africa must be fairly clement at that time.

He was MOM today muff, but there will still be ozil haters who don't understand football, he created at least 4 good chances, Suarez would love to play with ozil and so would Henry