You also are
at liberty of printing out the pages whenever and as many times as you wish.
In this drug - fueled reverie we're
at the liberty of a distractible hippie.
We are
at the liberty of these companies housing our sensitive data to adequately protect this information.»
Not exact matches
That
liberty can be difficult to come by
at large corporations where the name
of the game is to not rock the boat or do anything that might put existing revenue streams
at risk.
«This really puts
at risk both the security and
liberty of the American people,» said Senator Ron Wyden, D - Oregon.
Your customers may not know (or be
at liberty to explain) all the ramifications
of the purchase.
Look
at what they're doing through Obamacare with respect to assaulting the religious
liberties of this country.
But just as Green insinuated, the Trump administration has enacted, or has hinted
at enacting, policies that rankle Americans
of all political stripes, precisely because they could be used to encroach upon personal
liberties.
They mumbled something more about person
of interest, not
at liberty to disclose, etc..
«That was honest - to - God college beer money that I gave up to be associated with Cato, so you know about my commitment to the cause
of liberty,» he said during a forum
at the think tank last year.
It should not be difficult for companies to extend EU practices and policies elsewhere because they already have systems in place, said Nicole Ozer, director
of technology and civil
liberties at the American Civil
Liberties Union
of California.
President Donald Trump presided over a National Day
of Prayer event in the White House Rose Garden for the second year, pledging
at the Thursday morning gathering to protect religious
liberty all across America.
He is a senior scholar
at the school's conservative Mercatus Center, and has ties to the Goldwater Institute, a libertarian think tank, and the Competitive Enterprise Institute, which is «dedicated to advancing the principles
of limited government, free enterprise, and individual
liberty.»
After this story was initially published, David Rocah, an attorney
at the ACLU
of Maryland, said the civil
liberties group also would seek a copy
of the proposal.
However, you don't get the
liberty of choosing the shortest possible mortgage rate lock, then extending 15 days
at a time, as needed.
What a Christian buys is servitude in this life,
at the cost
of his
liberty (and often property), to people who claim to be authorized agents
of God, on hope
of reward that can not be verified until they are dead.
It's equally foolish to accept it
at face value and underestimate the great achievements
of liberty and law that we as Americans rightly take pride in and must work to protect.
In other words, his proposal, if it could be executed
at all, would produce an individual capable
of using
liberty well and responsibly, inevitably embedded in a society in which most people would be sorely tempted to abuse their
liberty.
Thus the principal «political» task
of the gentleman will be find ways
of resisting the encroachments
of the state into the family (while
at the same time appreciating and encouraging its protections
of our
liberties), and for that he may need unsavory allies.
(And since we are entering an era in which conservatives may be forced into considering,
at all levels
of government, the use
of more dramatically intransigent constitutional resistance options to various budget - destroying, Constitution - eroding, and religious -
liberty threatening trends
of liberal «governance,» a Lincoln - like precision about what we intend to do, and about what enormities we are constitutionally obliged to put up with, is all the more necessary.
that is a new place and that is going to be a bad place for American
liberty, and I think,
at that point, it's effectively game over for the United States
of America.
Although the specific content
of one's «
liberty»
at any given time may be difficult to assess, we know
at least this much: choices central to personal autonomy are also central to
liberty under the Fourteenth Amendment.
Over
at Mirror
of Justice, though, Thomas Berg sounds a bit more worried: «a possible lesson here for religious -
liberty advocates (applicable in other contexts too) is to beware
of pushing the envelope too much.»
If indeed choices «central to personal dignity and autonomy» are what lie
at the heart
of the
liberty protected by due process
of law, how can it be said that a terminally ill person's decision to end his or her life is any less «intimate and personal» than the decision to have an abortion?
At the very least, our country was founded on the concept
of God given rights: life,
liberty, and the pursuit
of happiness.
So to truly apply the mindset
of Madison today means to admit what he couldn't quite see: that just as air is to the regrettable existence
of fire, and as
liberty is to the regrettable existence
of faction, so is modern republican government to the regrettable existence
of various
at - bottom - suicidal democratic mindsets: progressivism, democratic socialism, militant secularism, and libertarianism.
What is the libertarian understanding
of religious
liberty at the present time?
At Public Discourse today, I explain what led the Left to rebuke the authentically American understanding
of religious
liberty after the 1993 passage
of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act:
In an important sense it is a greater violation
of religious
liberty to ban a ritual that is
at the theological heart
of a faith than to ban a peripheral celebration.
At Public Discourse today, I explain what led the Left to rebuke the authentically American understanding
of religious
liberty after the 1993 passage
of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act: Understanding why religious
liberty became politically controversial requires more than just identifying....
Nat died recently
at the ripe age
of ninety - one, receiving the laudatory obituaries he so richly deserves for his decades
of contributions to civil -
liberties discourse and the popular understanding
of jazz (his personal passion).
«What's
at stake is the First Amendment right to religious
liberty, and nothing goes to the heart
of this civil
liberty more than conscience rights,» said Bill Donohue, president
of the Catholic League.
It rejects restraint from without upon
liberty of interpretation, and
at the same time excludes an arbitrary or capricious use
of liberty by accepting the intrinsic control
of the historical movement within the Bible itself.
Legal academics have argued that this sort
of harm strikes
at the heart
of the common good, and that judges should count it against the moral and religious
liberty claims
of those seeking to avoid complicity with others» sins.
The critical method finds its way between the horns
of a dilemma: It rejects restraint from without upon
liberty of interpretation, and
at the same time excludes an arbitrary or capricious use
of liberty by accepting the intrinsic control
of the historical movement within the Bible itself.
In 1992, in the Casey opinion which confirmed America's unlimited abortion licence, Kennedy wrote that «
at the heart
of liberty is the right to define one's own concept
of existence,
of meaning,
of the universe, and
of the mystery
of human life»....
«I know enough that you can not have the advancing
of the radical homosexual agenda and religious
liberty at the same time, in the same nation,» he preached.
«In so ruling, the Administration has cast aside the First Amendment to the Constitution
of the United States, denying to Catholics our Nation's first and most fundamental freedom, that
of religious
liberty,» the letter continued and was read
at all English and Spanish language Masses, the diocese said in a statement.
Suppose, in a kind
of contented abstinence, we were to refrain from trying to understand more
of the landscape before us than the landscape cared to display for us, that we were willing to follow the bend
of bough and straggle
of gravel and tilt
of pole wherever the bend and the straggle and the tilt chanced to take us, that we concerned ourselves not with pattern or profit or even pleasure but merely with watching like a token sentinel in safe country, that we gave our eyes a quiet carte blanche and permitted our minds to play
at liberty over the face
of an untouched terrain?
When we think
of religious
liberty, the concept usually revolves around matters like whether the government can allow prayers
at public events.
Thus the particular question that has been
at the heart
of a lot
of our religious
liberty cases in the past few years — the question
of whether institutions in the corporate form are entitled to religious
liberty — is not a new question for our political tradition, and the answer that tradition has often offered it is not always friendly to the cause
of contemporary traditionalists.
You would think that someone who had any rationality to them
at all would be focusing on real issues, such as stripping away
of our civil
liberties, or the ongoing wars that actually cost this country billions
of dollars and hundreds
of lives, or the trillions
of dollars in our deficit.
Indeed, his commitment to religious
liberty was
at least as much a function
of his worry about domineering religious sects imposing themselves on the public square as
of any concern about a loss
of society's fundamental moral character.
These days, however, many religious and moral traditionalists in America can easily relate to the young Madison's anguished plea for pity and prayer — or
at the very least for a revival
of liberty of conscience.
«Slavery itself... is not
at all contrary to the natural and divine law... The purchaser [
of the slave] should carefully examine whether the slave who is put up for sale has been justly or unjustly deprived
of his
liberty, and that the vendor should do nothing which might endanger the life, virtue, or Catholic faith
of the slave.»
Paul addresses a concern
of Christian
liberty at the end
of 1 Corinthians 10, when he states, ««I have the right to do anything,» you say — but not everything is beneficial.
On two
of three contentious issues
at the intersection
of religious
liberty and nondiscrimination concerns, Americans remain evenly divided.
Archbishop Dolan concluded his statement with a matter -
of - fact declaration
of what is
at stake in the debate over DOMA: «The Administration's currentposition is not only a grave threat to marriage, but to religious
liberty and the integrity
of our democracy as well.»
The Exchange is a blog
of Ed Stetzer
of LifeWay Research and is hosted
at Christianity Today, which has reported extensively on higher education and religious
liberty.
Anyone who wishes to experiment with this conception
of the unrivaled as well as unsurpassed is
of course
at liberty to do so.