Sentences with phrase «at marriage if»

Not exact matches

Similar to a marriage, a business relationship will not prosper if the partners are constantly at odds over values or even over basic working styles.

If you aren't happy with yourself, or if you aren't at least asking yourself the hard questions about who you are, then how can you be happy in your marriage?&raquIf you aren't happy with yourself, or if you aren't at least asking yourself the hard questions about who you are, then how can you be happy in your marriage?&raquif you aren't at least asking yourself the hard questions about who you are, then how can you be happy in your marriage?»

Asked if he fell in love «at some point» with Herzer — who declined his offer of marriage in 2000, a few months after they began dating — Redstone answered «yes.»

If you think of the ongoing relationship between you and a venture capital investor (VC) is a marriage, then you can think of the term sheet at the prenuptial agreement.

Question: So that if the subject were to exclude the sacramentality of marriage, just as if one were to exclude children, for example, at the moment of the wedding, this could also make the contracted marriage null.

But I do think that black religious leaders have a responsibility, if they can not support gay marriage, to at least support and fight for the secular rights of gay people.

im glad no - one believes in demons - the devil or god — and they try to rationalise everything — and discredit the bible — just shows me where we are at in the holy book — see if i remember, the end times come when «scorners and scoffers abound» when — wrong is called right and right is called wrong — and people would be married and given in marriage as in the daysd of noah --- sodom and gammorah had gay issues badly - im just gonna laugh and alaugh and laugh when ya «ll burn - do me a favor — at least read the bible once — see what it says before you — go against it.

King's (lack of) support for gay rights at that time is very similar to the way that gay marriage activists refuse to comment when asked if they support plural marriage.

The American interfaith marriage rate is at 36 percent (if you throw all Protestants into one group).

If I point to my great - uncle's diary and say that the answer on gay marriage can be found in his private opinion on the matter, I would be laughed at.

If Christians are supposed to be waiting until marriage for sex, they aren't doing a very good job at it.

One, I think if you look at how the Bible portrays marriage generally, you will find this is not necessarily the case (just look at Deuteronomy for starters).

Such many found cases the girls were forced convinced into marriage at younger age by their parents or family members if orphans and when girls were asked why the answer was always poverty and starvation were the common enemy for many nations and populations!?

If you doubt that, just look at the startling speed with which ho.mose.xuality has gone from a crime worthy of committal into a psychiatric ward to being accepted, and now so - called ho.mose.xual marriage is now being legalized, and the outcasts of society are now the ones who still disaprove of this as being sinful.

Many denominations will * leave it at that * if you have had a prior marriage dissolved by divorce or a civil annulment.

If that is so, then marriage at 6 is still technically true, although the whole truth, I guess.

If one stands up and proclaims that gay marriage is ok and hurts majority of the population it is not called hate whereas if anyone points a finger at the moral decay it is defined as hate.&raquIf one stands up and proclaims that gay marriage is ok and hurts majority of the population it is not called hate whereas if anyone points a finger at the moral decay it is defined as hate.&raquif anyone points a finger at the moral decay it is defined as hate.»

If they can have all of this and still be virgins at the time of their marriage, I would consider that the best of all possible worlds.

Chastity in marriage does not mean abstinence (although abstinence is at times called for), but rather purification: seeking to ensure that what is sought above all is to show love for one's spouse and not mainly to satisfy one's own appetite for pleasure — even if that pleasure remains legitimate.

If your marriage is like mine, this means that the complementary differences between you and your spouse often fall into gender stereotypes (I am more emotional; Dan is more even - keeled), but not always (Dan is better at nurturing relationships than I am; I am more competitive).

Sane people can disagree about whether there ought to be a right to privacy, i.e., about whether it is logically a natural right and if so perhaps ought to be put into the Constitution via amendment, or about whether we (usually at state - level) should pass particular laws, such as ones that legalize gay - marriage, that factually expand what might be called privacy, but no sane U.S. Citizen, gay, straight, liberal, or conservative, should be left ignorant about the Constitution - wounding judicial usurpations done in the name of this right, more of which are planned to be done soon enough.

Most of us have to work at intimacy throughout our marriages if it is to flower.

You said, «This year Obama has run up the gay marriage flag on the electon poll and fired a test shot at the Chruch to see if still has any political weight.»

Here is my question, how come all the Belief Blog commentators take a decidedly liberal view of Christianity (if not actually opposed to it)... at least as far as «gay marriage» is concerned?

The bigots at Chick - fil - A, and everyone else, are free to not enter into a same sex marriage, if they feel it's not their cup of tea.

But on the other side if they endorse gay marriage, they'd have a lot of other people mad at them, too.

It's likely that you'll be able to rebuild some of the satisfying things you've lost from your marriage, if you're both willing to work at it.»

If people are arguing about same sex marriage or birth control, they aren't looking at the pedophile coverup.

I suspect that there is, if not a way out, then at least a temporary respite grounded in the observation that the only reason why marriage is even palatable to disordered moderns is that the meaning of marriage has already been twisted beyond recognition.

Well actually if you look at demographics marriage has not done as well as churches.

An overview of the marital journey provides the perspective a couple needs if they are to work at deepening the marriage relationship.

IF you're going to redefine «marriage» for the purpose of visiting someone in the hospital, obtaining equal access to health benefits, filing joint returns, then look at the entire legal definition.

It is true, in Gibson Winter's words, that «marital intimacy has to find a deeper foundation if it is to continue at the heart of marriage.»

«If you look at key swing states — Ohio, Florida, North Carolina, Iowa — those are all states where you had overwhelming majorities vote to protect marriage, and I think that we are going to focus on making very clear that this is a key distinction...

Thomas Peters, at CatholicVote.org, published a wonderfully clarifying post, responding to all this confusion: «We Only Lose Marriage if We Spend all Our Time Saying We Will Lose Marriage.»

Churches would be in a stronger legal position if they were to stop conducting weddings altogether: «Churches might indeed better protect themselves against the possibility of any such litigation by deciding not to provide marriage services at all, since there could be no complaint then of discrimination in their provision of services as between same - sex and opposite - sex couples.»

If we're not looking at marriage with this purpose in mind, we're actually missing what marriage is all about.

If only CNN would cover events at the National Mall, like the March for Life and the March for Marriage in such detail.

Nothing in life is «perfect» but I believe if Jesus is at the very center of two people's lives, and they are listening to Him, they will not «walk away» from their marriage.

Important issues are indeed at stake, including the right of Christians and adherents of other religions to uphold their vision of sexual integrity and marriage even if they are in the cultural minority.

If couples have been deeply alienated or strangling each other's creativity for years, their latent marriage can probably be developed — if at all — only by a process of marriage therapy or long - term marriage counselinIf couples have been deeply alienated or strangling each other's creativity for years, their latent marriage can probably be developed — if at all — only by a process of marriage therapy or long - term marriage counselinif at all — only by a process of marriage therapy or long - term marriage counseling.

As I write, the Coalition for Marriage petition against gay marriage has reached a total of 600,783 signatures and by the time this is in print, that total will be considerably higher - you can check its current level at http://c4m.org.uk/, and sign the petition while you are about it if you haven't already Marriage petition against gay marriage has reached a total of 600,783 signatures and by the time this is in print, that total will be considerably higher - you can check its current level at http://c4m.org.uk/, and sign the petition while you are about it if you haven't already marriage has reached a total of 600,783 signatures and by the time this is in print, that total will be considerably higher - you can check its current level at http://c4m.org.uk/, and sign the petition while you are about it if you haven't already done so.

That's me covered everything that I am supposed to cover in this talk, but if you will indulge me I'd like to finish by talking about marriage at a less theoretical and a more practical level.

If marriage is redefined, how will Christians be protected if they, for example, don't want to be a photographer at a gay weddinIf marriage is redefined, how will Christians be protected if they, for example, don't want to be a photographer at a gay weddinif they, for example, don't want to be a photographer at a gay wedding?

What does it mean to say marriage represents Jesus and the Church if marriage does not, at the very least, mean forgiveness and reconciliation in cases of adultery?

«Well, if they had just gone to this marriage conference and read this book, and if he would have been at home more, she wouldn't have had that affair.»

If someone has the opinion that gay marriage should not be made legal whether it is because of their beliefs at not (yes, there actually are people who are not Christians who don't agree with gay marraige), they are pointed out as Christians deserving of hatred and death.

However, generically speaking I continue to be surprised at how many times there are significant issues in families and marriages that involve, as one of the major components, if not THE major component, crisis brought about because people's perceived needs and rights (I call them their «wants») are not being met by others.

After a «Straight marriage only» petition was handed out last Sunday, which we were EXPECTED to sign I've really been debating if it's worth going at all...

If supporters of traditional marriage devolve into resentment and bitterness, they'll lose any chance at credibility.