Sentences with phrase «at other atheists»

They are highly directed at other atheists.

If you're a militant Atheist, that's fine, but you're also picking at other Atheists and Agnostics... which kinda shows that you might just be anti-social.

Not exact matches

According to the poll, the president's approval rating among Protestants and other Christians was 43 percent, it stood at 50 percent for Catholics, 61 percent among Jews, 63 percent for Atheists, Agnostics and those with no religion, and 64 percent for those from other non-Christian religions.

If you need other portions of the question posed, which you rejected earlier as an atheist trick, then tell me what the many women who are sometimes two women and somethines one woman found at the tomb, including whether the stone was in place, who they found and where, and the other details.

Looking back at the different comment threads on this article the usual banter has atheists and Christians exchanging angry and and mean comments at each other.

This and many comments to articles on the debate are often filled with Xtians and atheists throwing bitter and nasty attacks at each other.

This would imply that atheists tend to be intelligent, but underachieving, sad bitter men who watch others succeed in life and snipe at the fools who pass them by.

If as you say you have talked to others who claim to be Atheist the way you describe it then they are IDIOTS who also don't understand Atheism and yes at that point since they are claiming «no God» to be true, then by all means call their point of view a «religion».

Hmmm... a bunch of christians complaining about the actions of other christians (look at who runs the T), and blaming it on atheists.

Reality... his bones would have been produced and marveled at as proof that he did not resurrect the Jewish leaders at that time for sure would have produced them... providing of course that they were available... why do nt you take the time to study, read the evidence for yourself before spouting like so many other bitter atheists (that I once was for many years)... give love a try you might enjoy it, it gives live meaning and true purpose, everything finds its place in Christ... I hope you find hope some day...

Recognizing this fact, the National Atheist Party has no quarrel with those that would like to see the «cross» as a part of such a memorial, with the caveat that other faiths, including none at all, should also be represented.

I'm not an atheist, I was raised Catholic and believe in my religion but any Christian who openly professes their faith while condemning others who are of a different faith or of no faith at all, are blaspheming the true teachings of Christ.

The first billboard was put up in New Jersey by the atheists at the entrance to the Lincoln tunnel and the Catholic League put the billboard up in NY at the other entrance of the tunnel.

Many successful atheist writers lived long lives without violent deaths: Arthur C. Clark — 91 yrs.; Kurt Vonnegut — 85; Robert Heinlein — 82; James Randi, still going at 82; and many others that I don't have time to look up right now.

@John Marshall Atheists and certain other non-believers are perhaps the ONLY people who truly accept that they will indeed cease to exist at some point.

Most agnostics and atheists were in your shoes, have studied the bible and more importantly the history behind it's composition but at some point most realized that the reason for the current focus of worship was no more valid than worshiping any other god.

«It's a shame that the president totally dismissed the other adherents, the other celebrations that are happening at this time,» said David Silverman, president of the American Atheists.

The religious leaders have done next to nothing in this regard, except at times to be teach their members to be intolerant of others, especially those who have no regard for the Bible, such as atheists or agnostics.

You know — every time I see religion debated on a public forum, the whole thing is an exercise in mental futility as both the atheists and even some of the Christians make the same type of mistakes over and over again and just yell back and forth at each other.

It's a way to justify what you don't yet understand, rather than acknowledging that it's just understandable at the moment, and it's acceptance amongst those who think like they do, it's the creation of a definable «evil» to fight against (satan, atheists, other religions, basically everyone except their small group of like minders... even other denominations that are nearly identical quibble).

Some contend atheist Joe Stalin as having murdered the most at over 60 million slaughtered, others claim atheist Mao was responsible for the murders of hundreds of millions.

The atheist (strong atheist) on the other hand, is simply embracing an ideology that at its core is nonsensical and void of meaningful discussion.

So in this post, I will look at two traditional explanations for how God knows what it is like to lose a son, and I will also explain why I reject both explanations (which might also be why atheists and other people reject these explanations as well).

The only group I've seen get the same level of invective leveled at atheists online are witches and other Pagans, but that seems to only happen when there aren't any atheists milling about and the Pagans have repeatedly proven to a) know Christian theology and scripture better and b) remain calm, rational and compassionate yet resolute in their rejection of that theology.

It is entirely possible, and has always been possible, to be an atheist as a Boy Scout, if you can accept the basic idea of a moral something - or - other to which we should hold ourselves accountable, as long as you are comfortable calling it God at least as a metaphor.

Atheist... He now knows how it feels when he spews hatred at others.

Upon careful analysis, at least ten such points become apparent: (1) Blake alone among Christian artists has created a whole mythology; (2) he was the first to discover the final loss of paradise, the first to acknowledge that innocence has been wholly swallowed up by experience; (3) no other Christian artist or seer has so fully directed his vision to history and experience; (4) to this day his is the only Christian vision that has openly or consistently accepted a totally fallen time and space as the paradoxical presence of eternity; (5) he stands alone among Christian artists in identifying the actual passion of sex as the most immediate epiphany of either a demonic or a redemptive «Energy,» just as he is the only Christian visionary who has envisioned the universal role of the female as both a redemptive and a destructive power; (6) his is the only Christian vision of the total kenotic movement of God or the Godhead; (7) he was the first Christian «atheist,» the first to unveil God as Satan; (8) he is the most Christocentric of Christian seers and artists; (9) only Blake has created a Christian vision of the full identity of Jesus with the individual human being (the «minute particular»); and (10) as the sole creator of a post-biblical Christian apocalypse, he has given Christendom its only vision of a total cosmic reversal of history.

I have attneded Evangelical churches and other Evangelical meetings like Young Life back in the day, and the people there had absolutely no problem cheerfully consigning people to hell in the absence of any atheists or other critics at all.

Atheists have invented the multiverse, a kind of super-universe that randomly spews out other universes (with differing physical laws) at will.

In your posts you disagree with other atheists and you pick at semantics.

So these atheists they're looking at are people likely just recovering from a bad upbringing while the Christians, like many other a christians, are people for whom this isn't just an issue of ontology, but their whole ethics, lifestyle and world view.

if you can lie to yourself with immunity, you might be an atheist if you think the indifferent support your side, you might be an atheist if you don't think at all, you might be an atheist if you are drawn to religious discussions thinking someone wants to hear your opinion, you might be an atheist if you copy paste every piece of crap theory you find, you might be an atheist if you think you are right no matter what the evidence shows, you might be an atheist if you can't hold your water when you think about science, you might be an atheist if you can't write the word God, with proper capitalization, you might be an atheist if you think your view has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you think The View has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you live in a tar paper shack, writing manifestos, you might be an atheist if you think you're basically a good person, and your own final authority you might be an atheist if you think your great aunt Tillie was a simian, you might be an atheist if you own an autographed copy of Origin Of The Species, you might be an atheist if you think that when you die you're worm food, you might be an atheist if you think the sun rises and sets for you alone, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is Charles Darwin when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is you when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if you attend a church but palm the offering plate when it passes, you might be an atheist If think this exhausts all the possibilities of definition, you might be an atheist.

At the risk of seeming elitist, it would be interesting to know the average IQ of the agnostics and atheists versus the average IQ of the others in the study.

On the other hand, being an atheist, she naturally espouses amoral behavior; a lack of moral principles — only those that are self - imposed and self - executed, and which are subject to change at a whim.

Maybe, it is a kin to a fear in a Faithful if he or she has the relationship with God or Gods that is correct (religions)... but at least it is a Faith that something is out there so there is not the same level of fear we witness here from some Atheist and the ones that scream the most probably have more fear than the others.

Your point is not well taken most of the atheist do not hate religions at all, if the devout would just stay out of trying to run other peoples lives there would be no conflict.

Jeff, while on the surface your comments make sense; however, IF you dig down, and look at the real issues at hand, it is much more often and with much more vehemence, that Christians condemn atheists as «idiots» «heathens» «unclean» and any number of other rather unpleasant names.

(Again, I'm not saying there isn't any fire being spat at atheists, but I see a lot more fire going the other direction.)

It was true both of the religious sects like the local church and the pale thin - armed bespectacled atheists of the Larouchies, Randians, and other groups I ran into when I did editing work at certain noted institutions of higher learning.

Atheists have strong minds and are good at helping weak - minded people work through their struggles with other people or the imaginary forces or obstacles that men have made up.

We already know from a good deal of other data that in countries where atheism is accepted, atheists are at least as happy as Christians.

Atheist who do nt have a believe at least should understand and respect that others do and not offend them.

My being an «old fart» has set value incentivized placements uncommonly held by neither the religious nor the atheists ergo, I shoot for the moon and bark incessantly at moon - pies being others» leveraged buy - outs of plagued synopses engendered with rudeness chimney's silt and soot

Julie in Austin, (I actual used to go to school at the Jewish temple in downtown Austin) «In other cases, it assumes (as often do the arguments of Atheists) the very conclusion it is trying to reach».

In other books, McGrath (inter alia Professor of Theology, Ministry and Education at King's College, London) has battled against Professor Dawkins and the New Atheists.

Former Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams and renowned atheist Richard Dawkins have signed a letter in the Daily Telegraph along with over 60 others, arguing that the cap on the number of religious students at faith schools should stay.

The vast majority of atheists * take the view that there's no reason at all to believe in an afterlife, any more than in gods, ghosts, vampires, leprechauns, miracles, or any other aspect of the supernatural.

Atheists look at all religions the same way the same way most religions look at other faiths, we just think you're ALL wrong.

If atheists and Christians really have nothing better to do than snipe at each other, then BOTH of them miss a fundamental point of the holiday of Christmas.

There is a reason that most atheists are not comfortable sharing their views with others (at the workplace, school, etc.).