Not exact matches
After all, there's now a businessman in charge
at the White House
rather than a politician, and Trump has promised to cut taxes, boost infrastructure and
defence spending and slash regulations.
We should
rather concentrate on empowering our
defence, because our attacking options are good enough
at the moment.
United actually have the third best
defence in the Premier League
at the moment based on goals conceded, but this could be down to the amazing form of David De Gea
rather than a top class back - line.
and in my opinion im not fussed khedira isnt coming if the rumours are tru i would
rather gustavo a much better option
at cdm and more disciplined in the position then its just a a striker wich we may be able to get away with if reus is signed walcott fit rw, reus lw, alexis in the middle with those three up front NO
defence in EPL will be able to keep up we exploit teams
defences like never before.......
Stupidly rigid 70th minute subs,
rather than as the game warrants; ludicrous playing of players in wrong positions, for which he is notorious; catastrophic ingnorance of the vital need for attack /
defence BALANCE, with never two fullbacks up
at same time; inability to motivate players to fight, inability to keep them fit, stupid loyalty to long term hospital cases like Diaby and much more besides, too long to list on here.
Arsene Wenger does not think that we were just unlucky that Carroll was on top form, but
rather that our
defence has been weak
at dealing with these situations all season.
The focus
at Madrid has been on boosting their attack, but
rather like Barcelona up until this summer, their
defence needs some reinforcements too.
Rather than get the two outside forwards the ball so that they can gain speed and dribble
at defenders, Andre Villas - Boas prefers to get them the ball through the
defence.
At least Manuel Lanzini is set to return to add creativity and with Marko Arnautovic suddenly looking a very good player there should be enough quality to upset a Bournemouth
defence that often looks
rather accident prone.
With Toby Alderweireld still not 100 % fit, Wimmer could well step in, this time
at the heart of the
defence rather than
at left - back like last week.
He spends a fair section of it on
rather technical aspects of the growing presence of security and
defence policy
at the EU level, exploring why states delegate security /
defence functions to the EU, and how EU officials then manage to navigate a way through the fast - changing international environment.
Britain could also, building on a recent increase in Anglo - French
defence cooperation, push for a system in which France and Britain jointly provide a CASD,
rather than duplicating each other's efforts (and costs) as they do
at present.
But Downing Street later attempted to allay his concerns, insisting the missile
defence system is not aimed
at Russia but
rather a small group of rogue states with nuclear weapons.
As a (poor) analogy, arguing whether or not it's human - caused feels a bit like planning to develop real estate on a seaside clifftop which some specialists have said might suffer dangerous erosion in the next 70 years unless you put up some seawalls to prevent water action
at the base of the cliff - and basing your view whether to build seawalls and other erosion
defences upon whether or not there's proof that human activity would be the cause of any future erosion,
rather than whether or not erosion is likely and if so how harmful it might be to your interests if nothing is done to reduce it.
Timothy Langdale QC, the
defence lawyer for the former editor of the tabloid Andy Coulson, was cross-examining Evans
at the Old Bailey and said: «You seem to be a
rather risky hacker
at this time.»
Now,
at this point, you may want to remind me: a) shorting junior resource stocks can be difficult / impossible, and / or b) only a real idiot couldn't figure out (& take advantage of) such a blindingly obvious strategy!?! OK, in my
defence: i) again, I point you to all those academic studies, and ii) there are legions of muppet investors out there who will (
rather incoherently) argue the exact opposite in strategy... So here's the valid alternative to that trade
Rather than merely hammering these beasts into submission, players will have to watch their movements and ascertain exactly how to break through their
defences; it's a nice piece of contextual problem - solving that encourages changing tactics and are a welcome addition,
at least where this reviewer is concerned.
There's a sideswipe
at the carbon footprint of middleclass Aga owners; a
defence of Greens against the accusation that they're an overwhelmingly middle class movement; and a
rather pathetic attempt
at a class breakdown of Ryanair customers, before getting down to the main issue — an attack on Spiked and its principal contributors for their agnostic position on global warming.
Nobody resigned
at Science when they published that utter drivel about bacteria replacing phosphorus with arsenic; they just published seven comments (IIRC) back to back with a
rather desperate
defence from the original authors.
The board had a hard task as the
defence tactic does seem to have been to sit back and make Mrs George prove negligence while attempting to frustrate this
at every turn but the board seized on res ipsa
rather than leaving Mrs George without a remedy.
The EFF website has the full pleadings including the (
rather sketchy) Complaint, the Motion to Quash (which contains a spirited
defence of the right to blog, as part of the right to First Amendment anonymous speech, and the subpoenas directed
at the ISPs to force them to identify the bloggers.
As stated by the Court in Beardsley v. Ontario (2001), 57 O.R. (3d) 1 (C.A.),
at paras. 21 - 22: «The expiry of a limitation period does not render a cause of action a nullity;
rather, it is a
defence and must be pleaded.»