India is now looking actively
at a per capita - plus approach.
Also, how long could we supply a world of 10 million people consuming energy
at the per capita rate the USA currently consumes oil?
n (i) = The sustainable number of people that can occupy any area of this planet = The Number of people living
at per capita energy usage E (i)[N (E (i)-RSB- divided by the number of possible people «allowed» by thermodynamic considerations in that Fermionic state [g (i)-RSB-.
In short, the study does not look
at per capita climate impact, but a small handful of arbitrarily chosen behavioral markers.
If you look
at their per capita, they are about one - fifth or one - fourth the U.S..
First, the planet simply can not support its present population, much less the much larger one anticipated in the future, using resources
at the per capita rate now typical in the First World.
To illustrate this trend over the last 10 years, we took 2001 and 2011 education expenses for Nova Scotia, Ontario and B.C.. Each province's population of persons aged five to 24 in 2001 and 2011 was used to arrive
at a per capita number.
Not exact matches
As of 2014, in terms of total tax revenue as a percentage of GDP and measured
per capita, Norway came in
at No. 2 out of 35 countries ($ 37,682 USD), Denmark
at No. 3 ($ 30,630 USD), and Iceland came in
at No. 9 ($ 20,418 USD), according to the OECD.
Reseachers
at the global professional services firm said they based their conclusions on a number of «key» economic and demographic factors — from average income levels and population to the number of ski resorts
per capita, level of snow coverage and recent «form»
at the Winter Olympics.
Here's a look
at GDP
per capita (
per person) and median household income.Typically, if GDP
per capita is rising, some of that flows to household incomes.
«Our results show that the size of a country's economy is significant in determining their success
at the Winter Olympics, with gross domestic product (GDP)
per capita and population appearing as significant variables» they noted.
At more than $ 26,000 per capita, the average Canadian's non-mortgage debt is as high as it has been since at least 2004, according to Transunion, a credit burea
At more than $ 26,000
per capita, the average Canadian's non-mortgage debt is as high as it has been since
at least 2004, according to Transunion, a credit burea
at least 2004, according to Transunion, a credit bureau.
Outside South and Central America, where the fruit is native, Australia has the highest
per -
capita consumption in the world,
at an annual 3.2 kilograms (kg), or about 15 fruits, according to industry body Avocados Australia.
If you look
at per user and not
per capita, then Canada ends up below the U.S.. It's still higher than you might expect but there is some other evidence that Canadian usage is pretty high.
That might not sound like much but when you look
at cultural production on a
per capita basis, Canada shoots up to fourth.
Buffett cited current statistics in his analysis: U.S. population grew
at 0.8 % in 2015, according to the World Bank, while GDP grew $ 55,863.80
per capita in 2015.
Americans enjoy more self - storage space
per capita than anybody — nine sq. feet — whereas Canadians lag
at two.
North Korea's
per capita GDP is estimated
at $ 720.
The Bloc Quebecois lamented the disparity in
per capita spending that saw Quebec
at the bottom of the pack while more money
per capita was invested in smaller provinces.
Per capita revenue, however, was much higher in the U.S. at $ 44.67 compared to China's $ 27.41, although both countries were way behind South Korea's per - person amount of $ 526.
Per capita revenue, however, was much higher in the U.S.
at $ 44.67 compared to China's $ 27.41, although both countries were way behind South Korea's
per - person amount of $ 526.
per - person amount of $ 526.76.
Included in Goal no. 12 on «responsible consumption and production» is a call to «halve
per capita global food waste
at the retail and consumer levels.»
However, as he argued in his most recent book, The End of Energy Obesity, modern societies have
at their disposal the technological tools, and possibly the social pressure, to consume less energy in absolute terms, not just
per capita or
per dollar of GDP.
The province also has the lowest
per -
capita revenues,
at $ 8,369, partly due to relatively low levels of transfers from the federal government.
Pessimism always sounds more sophisticated than optimism — it's the Eden - collapse myth over and over again — and then you look
at G.D.P.
per capita worldwide, and it's up and to the right.
At one point in the debate, Wynne defended her government's spending record by stating that the Ontario government's
per -
capita program spending was the lowest of any province in the country, to which a surprised Tim Hudak responded, «fair enough.»
Their study (also in Southern Economic Journal) looked
at how
per capita income was affected by work stoppages in the National Football League and Major League Baseball over a nearly three - decade span.
For the United States, with its population of 320 million
at the time of that study, the pure economic payoff was thus only $ 400
per person, while
per capita GDP was close to $ 50,000.
As Robert Blecker, an economist
at American University, notes, «Contrary to the promises of the leaders who promoted it, NAFTA did not make Mexico converge to the United States in
per capita income, nor did it solve Mexico's employment problems or stem the flow of migration.»
While the number of branches has declined to 2.9
per 10,000 people, from 3.4 in the late eighties, the
per -
capita figure is still higher than
at any time before 1977, according to the research.
And bear in mind, China's real disposable income
per capita is growing
at high single - digit rates.
Between 2009 and 2030, China is projected to add roughly 850 million people to its middle class, and
per capita discretionary spending among this demographic group is on track to rise
at a rapid clip as well.
The budget also proposes block granting Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP)
at pre-ACA levels along with a state option of
per -
capita cap funding.
Compared to other major economies, India's
per capita consumption of oil is relatively low, as ownership of automobiles and motorcycles — many Indians» preferred mode of personal transportation — is still developing, with penetration
at merely 144
per 1,000 people.
The United States, meanwhile, lags in 9th place, with
per capita chocolate consumption
at 9.5 pounds a year.
By contrast, 27 quarters into the early 1990s recovery,
per capita government spending was 3 percent higher than
at the trough, 23 quarters following the early 2000s recession (a shorter recovery) it was 10 percent higher, and 27 quarters into the early 1980s recovery it was 17 percent higher.
Astoundingly,
per capita government spending in the first quarter of 2016 — 27 quarters into the recovery — was nearly 3.5 percent lower than it was
at the trough of the Great Recession.
To pinpoint the average retirement income you would need to live comfortably throughout the U.S., GOBankingRates looked
at five factors in all 50 states and the District of Columbia:
Per capita spending on groceries, healthcare, gas and fuel, housing and utilities and personal consumption expenditures not included in the four other categories.
With a
per -
capita adjustment, the headline number is lower
at 1.5 %.
To get an idea of the role each component of income
per capita plays in the Canada — U.S. income gap, we used the equation shown above, substituting U.S. data for one component
at a time, and keeping the country data for the other four components.
To calculate the personal savings rate, we looked
at data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) on the average income
per capita for each city in the U.S..
Real net national product rose
at the rate of 3.7 percent
per year from 1879 to 1897, while
per -
capita net national product increased by 1.5 percent
per year.
According to the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, in 2016 the Massachusetts
per capita personal income (PCPI) was $ 65,137, which was second - highest in the U.S. and 131 % of the national average,
at $ 49,571.
Real reproducible, tangible wealth
per capita rose
at the decadal peak in American history in the 1880s,
at 3.8 percent
per annum.
The estimated tax burden for state residents,
at just 7.1 % of
per capita income, is second lowest of all states.
I have looked
at the relationship between
per capita changes in real GDP and government debt
per capita and the relationship is negative, not positive.
Washington's value of exports
per capita,
at $ 11,849, is more than any other state.
What makes that sobering is if we look
at the retail square footage
per capita.
If you're looking
at such long time - scales, then normalizing to NGDP
per capita would make a great deal of sense.
When you look
at the list on a
per -
capita basis, Utah ranks 47th on the list.
According to findings of the country's National Production Council, in 1983 the daily consumption
per person was twenty - three grams.6 Per capita consumption of meat for Costa Ricans declined after that, in spite of the fact that consumption was already at an unacceptable level for supporting basic protein nutriti
per person was twenty - three grams.6
Per capita consumption of meat for Costa Ricans declined after that, in spite of the fact that consumption was already at an unacceptable level for supporting basic protein nutriti
Per capita consumption of meat for Costa Ricans declined after that, in spite of the fact that consumption was already
at an unacceptable level for supporting basic protein nutrition.