Sentences with phrase «at present global warming»

What is to prevent the earth from becoming Mars in just a few centuries at present global warming course?

Not exact matches

Our present global warming is not at all unusual by the standards of geological history, and it is probably benefiting the biosphere.

Such changes — whether caused by global warming or earthquakes — remain too small to be reliably detected at present, Gross says.

He suggested that there would be havoc in the tropics if global warming escalated at the present rate.

Climate model projections neglecting these changes would continue to overestimate the radiative forcing and global warming in coming decades if these aerosols remain present at current values or increase.

Professor Drijfhout said: «The planet earth recovers from the AMOC collapse in about 40 years when global warming continues at present - day rates, but near the eastern boundary of the North Atlantic (including the British Isles) it takes more than a century before temperature is back to normal.»

With ENSO - neutral conditions present during the first half of 2013, the January — June global temperature across land and ocean surfaces tied with 2003 as the seventh warmest such period, at 0.59 °C (1.06 °F) above the 20th century average.

Global warming will also mean more forest fires; hurricanes hitting cities that are at present too far north of the equator to be affected by them; tropical diseases spreading beyond their present zones; the extinction of species unable to adapt to warmer temperatures; retreating glaciers and melting polar icecaps; and rising seas inundating coastal areas.

With its mention of the ocean and the pursuit to reduce global warming to well below 2, even 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial temperatures, the agreement adopted by all 196 parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in Paris on December 12, 2015, is appreciated by scientists present at the negotiations.

by Adam D. Sacks Executive Director Biodiversity for a Livable Climate On November 21 - 23, 2014 at Tufts University in Medford, Massachusetts, USA, Biodiversity for a Livable Climate (Bio4Climate) presented its ground - breaking (no pun intended) conference, Restoring Ecosystems to Reverse Global Warming.

Even if global emission rates are stabilized at present — day levels, just 20 more years of emissions would give a 25 % probability that warming exceeds 2 °C.

However, this is just talking about global warming at present.

I will add to this - but at present there are also resources that explore Global Warming, Eating meat or being Veggi, Buddhist Peace Gardens and more.

It is impossible to stay indifferent to such a global problem as global warming, that is why you have to write a persuasive essay global warming, which will be able to present your own fears and worries at the subject, if you have some, of course.

Even if your professor has the different approach to global warming, but you will be able to present the convincing facts supporting your own idea at the subject your work will never be treated as incorrect or inappropriate one and will be rewarded according to its desserts.

You conclude that a 0.3 K difference is the maximum you would expect by year 2100, but this is equivalent to about one decade of global warming at present rates [0.3 K / decade?]

Dean et al (2018) «Methane Feedbacks to the Global Climate System in a Warmer World» You present @ 37 a lot of blather from this wide - ranging study but fails to spot the main finding germane to the issue at hand.

Nevertheless, the risk of triggering ocean circulation changes as a result of global warming can not be ruled out at present (which is why you use the word «probably»), and it needs to be studied and discussed.

This seems to have a motive... i.e. to present posts her eon RC that can then be used on deinalist blogs to say RC does not look at «alternative opinion» (even though those alternative opinions have no relevance to the reality that is behind the argument, that of global warming is happening, human - caused, and at this point, irrefutable... unless you have a legitimate refutation??? I'd love to see that!!!).

So the question to ask here is: why is the Gulf of Mexico so hot at present — how much of this could be attributed to global warming, and how much to natural variability?

I think the main reason it is often difficult to convince a lot of people of global warming science is because it is simply harder to present a tangible and irrefutable example of the science at work.

In the talk, Victor, trained in political science, warns against focusing too much on trying to defeat those denying the widespread view that greenhouse - driven climate change is a clear and present danger, first explaining that there are many kind of people engaged at that end of the global warming debate — including camps he calls «shills» (the professional policy delayers), «skeptics» (think Freeman Dyson) and «hobbyists.»

Wilmot McCutchen (26)-- We also know that during the previous interglacial, the Eemian, that global temperatures were about 2 K warmer than «at present», i.e., 1950s, and during that time considerable melt occurred in Greenland (and probably some of WAIS), resulting in a 4 — 6 m sea highstand (different in different locations).

The scientific community has also known for some time that the predicted future global warming in most climate models (more than 2 degrees C.) would probably be well above the long - term average temperature present at any time during the Holocene.

I don't know Seth, but I totally agree there's huge potential in electric vehicle retrofits, because the volume of new electric and plug - in hybrid cars is, at present, too small to meet the demand or to make a big dent in local air pollution and global warming emissions.

At a recent meeting of Latin American climate scientists, geophysicist Hugo Delgado of Mexico's National Autonomous University presented data showing that the glaciers atop the Iztaccíhuatl and Pico de Orizaba volcanoes in Central Mexico will disappear in the next 10 to 35 years due to global warming.

Just a few weeks ago, more than 300 Oregonians gathered at the Natural Capital Center in Portland to hear best - selling author, environmentalist, and climate advocate Paul Hawken present Drawdown, his long - awaited new book that chronicles over 100 creative solutions for addressing global warming.

I think that policymakers would want to see the science of global warming stated as clearly and explicitly as possible, irrespective of the technical level at which it is presented.

Other than studies detailing anthropogenic forcings for present global warming, are there well - document, peer - reviewed, well - accepted studies showing that are other factors at work as well?

People hear from the people who are fully vested in the position of making a bundle off of this fear based Global Warming Situation and they take it at face value that what has been presented is paramount to anything else heard from anyone else closing themselves off to any other logical point of view.

Administration officials have said they are working on a position on global warming but have not made a commitment to present a proposal at the next international meeting on the subject, in October.

Margaret Thatcher, Sarah Palin and many other conservatives accepted what was presented as a scientific consensus on «global warming», until the political agenda of the advocates became clear at Kyooto, Copenhagen, and finally the release of the CAGW manfesto called the SPM of the AR4.

Judy, you were very polite at the hearing but nevertheless effectively presented some of the realities that the global warming advocates do not want to hear.

The most statistics can tell us at present is that there does appear to be a genuine warming trend in figure A. Whether this trend is the effect of greenhouse gas emissions or of a natural fluctuation due to some as - yet - undiscovered mechanism can not be determined from an analysis of the global mean temperature alone.

Political scholar Steven F. Hayward recently presented in Issues the conservative position on global warming and climate change, including a look at measures that conservatives might accept as part of any action plan.

By continuing this trend, we can make a rough guess for how near - future climate may develop if the forces driving global warming continue at their present rate.

Looking deeper in time, global climate was an average of 2 to 3 degrees warmer than at present some 3 million years ago, and sea levels were 35 ± 18 m above the shoreline of today.

At the beginning of the present century fossil fuels were still relatively cheap, but concerns about energy security, global warming and fossil fuel depletion were already rumbling around.

IPCC computer models dating from 1990 through the present have consistently predicted at least 2.4 degrees of global warming per century.

First, given that Arctic seabeds are now releasing methane from gas hydrates at present levels of global warming, the 2 ° limit and carbon budget that Paul refers to is simply irrelevant.

«At present, governments» attempts to limit greenhouse - gas emissions through carbon cap - and - trade schemes and to promote renewable and sustainable energy sources are prob ¬ ably too late to arrest the inevitable trend of global warming,» the scientists write in a paper published online in the scientific journal, Nature Climate Change, on Monday, 14 October 2012.

May was clearly using the word to mean «the most important» (in relation to the global warming that is taking place at present, the subject of his article)-- something with which just about all climate scientists would agree.

The report was presented directly to the UN at its global warming summit in Cancun.

Have you considered that the economic risks of drastic carbon cutting and therefore access to cheap energy for developing economies, not to mention distractions from real and present infrastructure and land - management issues (a very likely factor in the recent Pakistan floods) under the catch - all label of global warming, may in fact represent a blind alley that contributes to a fatality risk for many of the world's poorest people of at least an order of magnitude greater than 1 %?

At present, survey researchers» choice of term seems somewhat haphazard — some surveys refer to the phenomenon as «global warming» (e.g., CBS News and New York Times 2006), others as «climate change» (e.g., Bloomberg 2009), and still others use the terms simultaneously (e.g., «global warming or climate change»; PIPA / Knowledge Networks 2005).

Rather than voting for global warming, I would like to see these «scientists» present at least one scientific principle that supports it.

My own examination of the warming we see at present seems to indicate that the atmospheric CO2 rose first (beginning with the industrial revolution and the massive use of fossil fuels) and this has been followed by the rising global mean temperature.

He presented some of his views and findings on global warming during the following talk at the Internationale Klimakonferenz in Berlin, Germany, December 2010 (32 minutes):

Current atmospheric CO2 levels are higher than at any time since at least a million years ago, and there is no notable scientific dissent from the consensus position that global warming is happening, is human caused, and presents a global problem.

8) «Propagandists of Neoliberalism / Neoliberal Government, Corporate and Financial Elites» — The discovery of global warming and attempts at concerted climate action have occurred within the neoliberal era, (1978 to the present).