Sentences with phrase «at rewarding its shareholders»

In other words, ROE tells you how good a company is at rewarding its shareholders for their investment.

Not exact matches

The challenge claimed that a majority of shareholders did not support the authorization, at the 2013 annual meeting, of an increase in the number of shares used to reward Souki and other executives; the very increase that made Souki the highest paid CEO in America (he received 6.3 million shares in February 2013).

Just because a company succeeded in making the Fortune 500 does not mean it rewarded its shareholders — in fact, every year, at least a handful of corporations fail miserably in the stock returns department.

If Mr. Rahim can garner the support from the two activist funds and drive cost cutting while providing better leadership at the firm, shareholders could be rewarded.

No doubt Tim Cook understands the need to keep activist investors at bay, yet still reward current shareholders.

David J. Winters, CEO of Wintergreen Advisers, said: «While there has been progress in some areas at Coca - Cola, the board continues to give Muhtar Kent and his team excessive rewards, and we question whether many Coca - Cola directors are able to vigorously act for all shareholders given their overlapping business interests.»

And since the board / management are the obvious problem / road - block here in terms of capital allocation, I do think the recent board changes actually offer asymmetric risk / reward — at worst, we end up with some new management / board members & just more of the same... but at best, we end up with a team who can actually deliver on acquisition (s) and / or a meaningful return of capital to shareholders (ideally, via a tender offer).

Presumably, these companies are ignoring their current share price and assuming that patient shareholders will eventually be rewarded through a reversal in institutional investing trends or, more likely, a liquidity event at some later date.

All of which seems like a real misperception at this point: a) Management is successfully pursuing the asset management / seeding strategy they laid out for investors, they've executed a number of value - enhancing tender offers, and they also appear focused now on the long - term rewards to come from being shareholders (rather than screwing shareholders!)

I don't recall having seen an example of that kind of situation myself — but I think I spoke to that risk here: «At the v worst, I think there's a risk KWG shareholders end up cashed out, or flipped into Conwert shares, with little reward in the way of a premium.»

Presumably, these companies are ignoring their current share price and assuming that patient shareholders will eventually be rewarded through a reversal in institutional investing trends, or perhaps, in a liquidity event at some later date.

As I've said before, I find it hard to invest in (what looks like) a low risk / easy reward transaction when I can't confirm the underlying value... And with this deal, I just don't see the 3.92 cts per share that's been promised as a shareholder payout... All I see are worthless shares in a hopelessly insolvent company — and I thought some shareholders would see the same thing and bail out at any price.

But resource directors almost never reward long suffering shareholders with cold hard cash (just look at Minco (MIO: LN), a pitiful example).

Yes, a diminishing supply will raise prices for consumers, which at the moment appears to reward shareholders well, but investors are supposed to look ahead into the future and anticipate areas of strong economic growth, and one can not reasonably conclude this will be the case for fossil fuels.