Sentences with phrase «at risk of child maltreatment»

In 2003, the Children's Bureau released a request for proposals (RFP) to build home - and community - based systems of care to improve outcomes for children, youth, and families at risk of child maltreatment, children and youth who have been identified as victims of maltreatment but have not been removed from their home, or children and youth in State custody (foster care).

Pathways Triple P A 4 - 5 session intervention strategy for parents at risk of child maltreatment, used in combination with either Triple P interventions.

Pathways Triple P An adjunctive intervention strategy for parents at risk of child maltreatment used in combination with other Triple P interventions.

Not exact matches

Ofsted's new inspection framework makes clear that children's services should pay attention to all parents and carers when children have been maltreated or are at risk of maltreatment or neglect.

The initiative is targeted at improving child and family outcomes, including decreasing rates of child maltreatment and improving parenting practices that may decrease risk for maltreatment.

Courts around the country drive much of the public's action on behalf of children who may have been or who are at risk of maltreatment.

Setting At - risk families in North Carolina followed up in a longitudinal study of child maltreatment.

After controlling for these established risk factors (Table 2, panel 1, multivariate analysis), children who were maltreated (definite maltreatment: RR, 1.69; 95 % CI, 1.13 - 2.55) and children who were socially isolated (very high social isolation: 1.76; 1.12 - 2.77) were both at greater risk of becoming depressed in adulthood.

In departing from approaches that sought to identify and serve at - risk people, Essentials endorses the use of frameworks that emphasize the development of family strengths6 as the key to both preventing maltreatment and promoting child health.

Several have included families involved with child maltreatment or at high risk of maltreatment, but hardly any have included families who were the subject of child abuse and neglect reports.41 The Incredible Years (IY) is considered to be one of the most effective interventions for reducing child conduct problems.42 Jamila Reid, Carolyn Webster - Stratton, and Nazli Baydar examined IY, randomly assigning children to the IY program or to a control group that received usual Head Start services.43 Children with significant conduct problems and children of mothers whose parenting was highly critical — arguably those dyads most at risk for child maltreatment — benefited most children to the IY program or to a control group that received usual Head Start services.43 Children with significant conduct problems and children of mothers whose parenting was highly critical — arguably those dyads most at risk for child maltreatment — benefited most Children with significant conduct problems and children of mothers whose parenting was highly critical — arguably those dyads most at risk for child maltreatment — benefited most children of mothers whose parenting was highly critical — arguably those dyads most at risk for child maltreatment — benefited most from IY.

In this context, that is, of neurodevelopmental problems, parents theoretically can transmit to their children an adverse environment and a genetic susceptibility to ADHD; on the other hand, a child with a specific genotype (and at risk of hyperactivity and impulsivity) may behave in ways that elicit maltreatment.

Objective: Maltreatment, family violence, and disruption in primary caregiver attachment in childhood may constitute a developmental form of trauma that places children at risk for multiple psychiatric and medical diagnoses that often are refractory to well - established evidence - based mental health treatments.

Primary Care Interventions to Prevent Child Maltreatment: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement Moyer (2013) Annals of Internal Medicine, 159 (4) Analyzes a systematic review of interventions to prevent child maltreatment for children at risk, focusing on new studies and evidence gaps that were unresolved at the time of the 2004 recommendation by the U.S. Preventive Services Task FChild Maltreatment: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement Moyer (2013) Annals of Internal Medicine, 159 (4) Analyzes a systematic review of interventions to prevent child maltreatment for children at risk, focusing on new studies and evidence gaps that were unresolved at the time of the 2004 recommendation by the U.S. Preventive ServicesMaltreatment: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement Moyer (2013) Annals of Internal Medicine, 159 (4) Analyzes a systematic review of interventions to prevent child maltreatment for children at risk, focusing on new studies and evidence gaps that were unresolved at the time of the 2004 recommendation by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Fchild maltreatment for children at risk, focusing on new studies and evidence gaps that were unresolved at the time of the 2004 recommendation by the U.S. Preventive Servicesmaltreatment for children at risk, focusing on new studies and evidence gaps that were unresolved at the time of the 2004 recommendation by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

alternative response A formal response of the agency that assesses the needs of the child or family without requiring a determination that maltreatment has occurred or that the child is at risk of maltreatment.

Eligible clients include families with a history of child maltreatment or families at risk for child maltreatment.

investigation A type of Child Protective Services response that involves the gathering of objective information to determine whether a child was maltreated, or is at risk of maltreatment, and establishes if an intervention is neChild Protective Services response that involves the gathering of objective information to determine whether a child was maltreated, or is at risk of maltreatment, and establishes if an intervention is nechild was maltreated, or is at risk of maltreatment, and establishes if an intervention is needed.

If home visiting programs target the most at - risk families (i.e., young and poor parents, parents with a history of child maltreatment), the research suggests that these programs may positively influence parents» support of their children's learning and reduce rates of child maltreatment.

The program of prenatal and infancy home visiting by nurses, tested with a primarily white sample, produced a 48 percent treatment - control difference in the overall rates of substantiated rates of child abuse and neglect (irrespective of risk) and an 80 percent difference for families in which the mothers were low - income and unmarried at registration.21 Corresponding rates of child maltreatment were too low to serve as a viable outcome in a subsequent trial of the program in a large sample of urban African - Americans, 20 but program effects on children's health - care encounters for serious injuries and ingestions at child age 2 and reductions in childhood mortality from preventable causes at child age 9 were consistent with the prevention of abuse and neglect.20, 22

The samples were distinct and were meant to include children in several categories, including those at risk before any reports of child maltreatment, those reported but whose investigations were not yet complete, those reported and substantiated and left in their homes with or without intervention, and those placed in foster care.

Has evidence to show that offering Triple P to an entire community (as opposed to targeting «at risk» families) can reduce rates of child maltreatment, foster care placements and hospitalizations from child abuse injuries.

Multiple randomised controlled trials undertaken Maintenance of improvements Generalisation of outcomes for children with disabilities; children at risk of maltreatment; families of an Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander background.

Research suggests that children in households with domestic violence may be at an increased risk for child maltreatment.13 - 16 Although some child maltreatment may be caused directly by the male perpetrators of domestic violence, other incidents may result from the effects of domestic violence on the mothers» caregiving capacities (eg, through injury, mental distress, and restricted mobility).

Realizing the Promise of Home Visitation: Addressing Domestic Violence and Child Maltreatment: A Guide for Policy Makers Family Violence Prevention Fund (2010) Presents recommendations for building a strong national policy framework to maximize the effectiveness and reach of early childhood home visiting programs and to ensure that Federal home visiting policies directly address the needs of mothers and children who are experiencing or at risk of experiencing domestic violence.

Effectiveness of Home Visiting in Improving Child Health and Reducing Child Maltreatment Avellar & Supplee (2013) Pediatrics, 132 (2) Reviews the home - visiting research literature and provides an assessment of the evidence of effectiveness for program models that serve families with at - risk pregnant women and children from birth to age 5.

For example, a child who experiences maltreatment may develop primary emotional responses such as anxiety or fear.5 Ever vigilant for signs of threat, the child may display aggressive or submissive behaviours as a means of self - protection, and such behaviours may place the child at risk for future status as a bully or victim.

A Comprehensive Framework for Nurturing the Well - Being of Children and Adolescents (PDF - 676 KB) In Integrating Safety, Permanency and Well - Being Biglan (2014) Presents a framework to ensure successful youth development and well - being for children who have been maltreated, or are at risk of being maltreated, indicating that comprehensive family support from prenatal / birth through adolescence is necessary to aid children in recovering after abuse has occurred and to prevent future maltrChildren and Adolescents (PDF - 676 KB) In Integrating Safety, Permanency and Well - Being Biglan (2014) Presents a framework to ensure successful youth development and well - being for children who have been maltreated, or are at risk of being maltreated, indicating that comprehensive family support from prenatal / birth through adolescence is necessary to aid children in recovering after abuse has occurred and to prevent future maltrchildren who have been maltreated, or are at risk of being maltreated, indicating that comprehensive family support from prenatal / birth through adolescence is necessary to aid children in recovering after abuse has occurred and to prevent future maltrchildren in recovering after abuse has occurred and to prevent future maltreatment.

The aims of this study were to examine how the quantity (i.e., the amount of shared activities) and quality (i.e., perceived quality of the father - child relationship) of father involvement are differently related to internalizing and externalizing behavior problems among preadolescents at risk of maltreatment and test if these associations are moderated by father type and child maltreatment.

Susan Janko Summers, Ph.D., is an educational ethnographer who has studied and written about child maltreatment, infant mental health, children with disabilities, and children and families at risk in the contexts of culture, community, and educational settings.

Through governmental and public support of successful interventions, prevention will progress and fewer children will remain at risk of maltreatment.

Uses, at a minimum, screening criteria that indicate a risk of maltreatment based on the original screening criteria or based on locally determined risk factors of child maltreatment

Parents with intellectual and / or significant learning disabilities (ID / LD) who are likely to have less developed abilities on a variety of child care skills than parents without such disabilities and at greater risk of causing child maltreatment

Target Population: Overburdened families who are at - risk for child abuse and neglect and other adverse childhood experiences; families are determined eligible for services once they are screened and / or assessed for the presence of factors that could contribute to increased risk for child maltreatment or other poor childhood outcomes, (e.g., social isolation, substance abuse, mental illness, parental history of abuse in childhood, etc.); home visiting services must be initiated either prenatally or within three months after the birth of the baby

The study evaluated the effectiveness of the Healthy Families New York home visiting program in promoting parenting confidence and preventing maladaptive parenting behaviors in mothers at risk for child maltreatment.

Child FIRST (Child and Family Interagency Resource, Support, and Training) is a home visitation program for low - income families with children ages 6 - 36 months at high risk of emotional, behavioral, or developmental problems, or child maltreatment, based on child screening and / or family characteristics such as maternal depression.1 Families are visited in their homes by a trained clinical team consisting of (i) a master's level developmental / mental health clinician, and (ii) a bachelor's level care coordinChild FIRST (Child and Family Interagency Resource, Support, and Training) is a home visitation program for low - income families with children ages 6 - 36 months at high risk of emotional, behavioral, or developmental problems, or child maltreatment, based on child screening and / or family characteristics such as maternal depression.1 Families are visited in their homes by a trained clinical team consisting of (i) a master's level developmental / mental health clinician, and (ii) a bachelor's level care coordinChild and Family Interagency Resource, Support, and Training) is a home visitation program for low - income families with children ages 6 - 36 months at high risk of emotional, behavioral, or developmental problems, or child maltreatment, based on child screening and / or family characteristics such as maternal depression.1 Families are visited in their homes by a trained clinical team consisting of (i) a master's level developmental / mental health clinician, and (ii) a bachelor's level care coordinchild maltreatment, based on child screening and / or family characteristics such as maternal depression.1 Families are visited in their homes by a trained clinical team consisting of (i) a master's level developmental / mental health clinician, and (ii) a bachelor's level care coordinchild screening and / or family characteristics such as maternal depression.1 Families are visited in their homes by a trained clinical team consisting of (i) a master's level developmental / mental health clinician, and (ii) a bachelor's level care coordinator.

Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations) The study evaluated the effectiveness of the Healthy Families Arizona [now called Healthy Families America] home visitation program for families at risk for child maltreatment.

The study evaluated the effectiveness of the Healthy Families New York [now called Healthy Families America] home visiting program in promoting parenting confidence and preventing maladaptive parenting behaviors in mothers at risk for child maltreatment.

The goal of this project is to implement SafeCare with a population at high risk for child maltreatment, and to develop and test important adaptations of SafeCare.

Victims of child maltreatment are at risk for other types of violence later in life, including youth violence, suicide, and intimate partner violence.

SafeCare will be implemented with a group of Latino parents at high risk for child maltreatment.

Effects of an evidence - based parenting program on biobehavioral stress among at - risk mothers for child maltreatment: A pilot study.

The glaring rate of history of child sexual abuse, including the onset of maltreatment, highlights those most at risk for sex trafficking.

Our research confirms that infants who receive a diagnosis of NWS are at greater risk for having a substantiated child maltreatment allegation and for entering foster care.

The findings demonstrate that educators are in a unique position to intervene and support children at risk of maltreatment.

[jounal] Bailey, H.N / 2007 / Children maltreatment, complex trauma symptoms, and unresolved attachment in an at - risk sample of adolescent mothers / Attachment & Human Development 9 (2): 139 ~ 161

There is evidence that maltreated children are at greater risk for lifelong health and social problems, including mental illnesses, criminality, chronic diseases, disability1 and poorer quality of life.2 A history of child maltreatment is also associated with lower adult levels of economic well - being across a wide range of metrics, including higher levels of economic inactivity, lower occupational status, lower earnings and lower expected earnings.3 Existing research suggests a ripple effect caused by lower educational achievement, higher levels of truancy and expulsion reducing peak earning capacity by US$ 5000 a year4 or an average lifetime cost of US$ 210012 per person1 when considering productivity losses and costs from healthcare, child welfare, criminal justice and special education.

In specific, we included two types of interventions: preventive interventions targeting the general population or targeting families at risk for child maltreatment and curative interventions targeting maltreating families aimed at reducing maltreatment or recurrence of maltreatment.

Interventions may be aimed at reducing the incidence of child maltreatment in maltreating families or at preventing the occurrence of child maltreatment in at - risk, but non-maltreating families.

Previous research has investigated the deleterious effects of child maltreatment on child development; however, little research has examined the development of children who live with caregivers who are at risk of maltreatment on child development outcomes.

We focused on families followed across early childhood, because infants and toddlers are at the greatest risk of exposure to neglect (the most prevalent type of child maltreatment), and this period spanning the transition to parenthood presents heightened risk for IPV.

The finding that curative interventions are more effective than preventive interventions may be explained by a lower prevalence of child maltreatment in at - risk families / the general population than in maltreating families, making it «more difficult» to find significant differences between intervention and control groups (because of lower statistical power) and consequently, to prove the effectiveness of an intervention.