In a recent case, my in - court comments to the victim
at sentencing did not further these important tenets.
Not exact matches
«Most people are in prison because they didn't know how to make enough money legally,» says Jackson, who has more than a decade left in his
sentence at Green Haven.
If you
do this, look for
sentences or stories or claims or other statements that jump out
at you.
I didn't even get to finish my
sentence before he had hopped the counter to run
at me.
Investors aren't looking for Canadian courts to
sentence white - collar criminals as severely as U.S. courts
do, according to Michael Watson, director of enforcement
at the Ontario Securities Commission.
On the 147th page of Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In,
at the start of the «In Conclusion» section, the following
sentence appears: «There is probably nothing in this book which you
did not already know
at some level of your experience.»
The government said Weiner's «widely - reported prior scandals» were not criminal in nature and
did not involve minors but should be considered
at sentencing because they reveal a familiar pattern.
Says McGrath, «I put an action
sentence at the end of every description that says, «Don't lose out.
The
sentence, he concluded on the matter, should therefore be directed
at the moral quality of someone who enters into the situation that Shrem
did.
When someone is searching online for a local or national business, they
do not punch in an exact and properly formatted question or
sentence,
at least not in most cases.
Entrepreneur - turned - angel - investor Jason Calacanis doesn't mince words, and this week's Too Embarrassed to Ask podcast is no exception: Asked by one of our listeners if he regretted selling his shares of Facebook when they were going for only $ 110 - 120 (versus $ 174
at the time of this writing), he had a one -
sentence answer ready.
In looking for sources of inspiration for the White Rose, Inge Scholl quotes
at length the protests from the 1942 sermons of Count Galen, Bishop of Muenster, who forcefully spoke out against the Nazi death
sentence for «life which
does not deserve to live» (Unwertesleben).
About the only thing to
do is try your post one
sentence at a time and see what flies... when you find the culprit, try one word
at a time.
I like how in you're very first
sentence, you yourself lash out
at a group of people who's perspective you don't understand, without defending your religion
at all, then in the very next
sentence say you'll «stop here for fear of retaliation for defending your religion».
They look
at this verse, and not having
done their homework with the
sentence structure, or the Greek text, say that the gift of God is not salvation, but our faith.
Is it just me or
does this
sentence make no sense
at all.
«We look
at a whole range of evidence, both what happened in the original offences, the judge's
sentencing remarks, the programmes or work a prisoner has
done, reports from people who know the prisoner well.
At the present and with this hot media publicity exposure only The King of KSA has the Holy Power if to
do any thing about for her getting a lower
sentence or be released for deportation any where on Earth!!
The fact that you have issues capitalizing names (kenrick and Benjamin...) and the haphazard way you keep
doing it throughout the
sentence shows that
at best you tried to emphasize somewords and don't understand the finer points of capitalization.
David read the whole
sentence and then read the whole book, then go and study what the Hebrews were
doing at that time, falling into paganism, specifically the babylonian stuff going on.
Again, it is recorded that on one occasion a group of lawyers brought before him a woman detected in adultery, with the hope that he would take the responsibility of pronouncing the ferocious
sentence laid down in the Law of Moses (not enforced
at that period), or alternatively, would by refusing to
do so expose himself as one who condoned immorality.
Furthermore, the
sentence about animals being «as near to God as men are» simply
does not appear in the Pope's text
at all.
I try to coin words that don't exist and craft
sentences to explain how it feels when I look
at the curve of my daughter's cheek while she nurses
at my breast or how I learned to pray by
doing laundry or how dignity is overrated and how the Holy Spirit feels like a bracing cold wind to me and how you only really learn that when you have nothing left or how I believe in a God who climbs down into the obscurity and calls us beloved but I keep coming up with nothing much.
I still think if you re-read Matthew 5 - 7 you will plainly see Jesus mentions
at least 5 «
do not /
do»
sentences — and in each he teaches to go deeper into the idea being taught.
The reason Salero quotes the bible is that he can't put together a coherent
sentence that doesn't have
at least 3 errors — he isn't smart enough to go GET an education so he doesn't look like the moron he was born to be.
This is specific to church —
at the office I talk to fellow colleagues who don't feel the need to tell me they are married or engaged on the second
sentence.
Just because I can't write two
sentences without throwing banal childish insults
at you doesn't necessarily mean that I'm a caustic, insincere troll.
Just because one can string together English words in a grammatical
sentence and add a question mark
at the end doesn't mean that such a construct carries any meaning.
Now, let's look
at the second part of your
sentence, where you said:» A group of muslims or a group of immigrants
does not elicit the same kind of reasoned respose [sic] a group of KKK would, because muslims are not KKK and neither are immigrants.»
Let me begin by putting it this way — and here I quote a favorite
sentence from Dr. William DuBose, a great American theologian forgotten by most Americans, for many years a professor
at the University of the South — «There is no limit to that which God will
do for us, but He will never
do it in spite of us, but always through us.»
It is perhaps just as well he remains busy, given that the U.S. prison service
does not much allow for leniency when it comes to early release, and Black is likely to serve
at least 85 per cent of his
sentence, making him past 70 by the time he regains his freedom.
In truth the Revelation of St. John the Divine is the Ark of the Testament; and the Revelation of Jesus Christ was the Book hidden in this Ark and carried to me through the 2,000 years that seperated the time when John first got it; and then; (as it is written
at chapter 10 of his own Revelation)
at the very last
sentence of that chapter; when it is said to him by the angel of the Covenant Jonathan (who John the Baptist was named after, by the way) that he «would have to prophesy again»; as to explain what his Revelation was all about: otherwise the Revelation would have absolutely sered no purpose
at all; and it
does; as all will soon shortly know.
Most could keep their head above the murky waters, but I drowned in them, my mind and soul became as a vegetable, void of all emotions and life, there are ones that have my testimony when God apprehended me and manifested Himself to me, that I became One with Him in His life: I was a walking zombie and nothing more
at that time, a vessel for my master use being cared for by my adult children on disability with a grade 5 education, with ADDHD and dyslexia, I couldn't even spell or string 2
sentences together that made any sense: All that has been
done in my life for the last 11 yrs.
Well, it teaches us to put a comma instead of a period
at the end of the
sentence: «
Do not put your hope in this present world.»
There we go again, shut up this hypocritical rightwingers.Only
at election time
do rear their ugly heads up to be seen and heard.It's time to unleash the CRACKKIN, the monster that the IRS people use on unruly religious groups, exemption is like a death
sentence to these groups.Most of these religious leaders are wolves in sheeps clothing, selling their political poison to anyone in their flocks.They push the envelope on the seperation of church and state issue, seeing how far they can go.Pastors and ministers would never speak politics like this years ago, that was taaboo.Now people like Robertson, Graham, and the rest, flaunt their ideaology both religious and political
at every event.They don't care about the legal consequences, they have LAWYERS, perishioners pay for that.
As Ramsey traced the development back, he finally reached the point that proved, for me, telling and decisive: that there is nothing we have now, genetically, that we
did not have when we were that zygote, no larger than the period
at the end of this
sentence.
There
does seem to be some distinction
at work, since the two terms are used
at times in the same paragraph, even in the same
sentence.
I've mentioned before that I not a morning person, in fact, I don't think I really utter full
sentences until I've been up for
at least a couple of hours.
(And I remember thinking when I was on line
at a store this afternoon, wait,
did I ever finish that
sentence?
At least you brought some reality into that sentence by admitting it doesn't always work out, but to say Wenger is master at motivation is incomprehensibl
At least you brought some reality into that
sentence by admitting it doesn't always work out, but to say Wenger is master
at motivation is incomprehensibl
at motivation is incomprehensible!
He
does sport radio
at peast sometimes and he ends every other
sentence with it is what it is or is what it
does or something like that.
When Ramos and his sisters Betty and Miriam didn't focus, when he goofed around
at school, when his report card wasn't what it should be, he was punished,
sentenced to kneeling on a cheese grater on naked knees, holding books over his shoulders, the way Atlas shrugged the Earth.
I
do not disagree with this
sentence: «Wenger
did mistakes
at the helm» but I disagree with the fact that Wenger only is the problem for our club.
There can not be a single football fan who hasn't,
at some point, started the
sentence «What the hell are you
doing shooting from there?»
If spu
do this
at their first ever opportunity, I don't know how to finish this
sentence because it's just plain unthinkable.
At last, apart from the first 2
sentences, a sensible comment from you without resorting to name calling and sycophantic copy and pasting... well
done..
and didn't understand your second
sentence, but how many guys you see
at 145 get KO'd cold and stiff like that?
Look
at that first
sentence, it's already been
done.
Don't be scared by that last
sentence if you are a mom - to - be, not everyone has that experience, and even if you
do that gorgeous newborn staring back at you has no idea you are a hot mess, and he / she will look so deliciously cute you really won't notice it... muc
do that gorgeous newborn staring back
at you has no idea you are a hot mess, and he / she will look so deliciously cute you really won't notice it... much.
Matt, in the article Dr. Amy says «THERE IS NO EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THOSE CLAIMS»: maybe I'm wrong, but to my non-native understanding, this
sentence doesn't necessarily mean «there is no evidence
at all», but rather: any evidence there might be, it is not enough to support claims such as «increased medicalization of childbirth may be having severe consequences on the life - long health of our children... What's more, it could be having a devastating effect on the future of our entire species».