Look
at subgroup performance.
Not exact matches
NCLB mandated reading and math testing in grades 3 through 8 and
at least once in high school, and it required states to rate schools on the basis of test
performance overall and for key
subgroups.
The natural question is, how will that
subgroup of students meet the
performance targets when students who score
at proficient levels are quickly taken from the group?
Identification of, and comprehensive, evidence - based intervention in, the lowest - performing five percent of title I schools, all public high schools with a graduation rate below 67 percent, and public schools in which one or more
subgroups of students are performing
at a level similar to the
performance of the lowest - performing five percent of title I schools and have not improved after receiving targeted interventions for a State - determined number of years; and
The bill replaces AYP standards with a requirement for states to annually measure all students and individual
subgroups by: (1) academic achievement as measured by state assessments; (2) for high schools, graduation rates; (3) for schools that are not high schools, a measure of student growth or another valid and reliable statewide indicator; (4) if applicable, progress in achieving English proficiency by English learners; and (5)
at least one additional valid and reliable statewide indicator that allows for meaningful differentiation in school
performance.
Under current law, a state must determine the average yearly progress (AYP) for all students and
subgroups at the school, LEA, and state level; AYP standards mandate specified thresholds of
performance with respect to assessments and graduation rates.
In math, charter school entry increases
performance among all
subgroups of students
at district schools except Hispanic students and students classified as LEP, who experience no effects; Asian students only experience a significant positive effect in math in district schools located within a half - mile radius.
«While the
performance of Virginia students compares favorably to that of students in other states, the disparities between
subgroups underscore the importance of the Board of Education's policies and initiatives aimed
at narrowing, and ultimately closing, achievement gaps,» Board of Education President David M. Foster said.
During her tenure
at Hamilton, student achievement improved in all
subgroups as evidenced by growth on the California Academic
Performance Index.
«However, by including former English learners, overall scores for the
subgroup will rise and may mask the
performance of current English learners,» Delia Pompa, senior fellow for education policy
at the Migration Policy Institute in Washington, D.C., wrote in a commentary for EdSource.
The federal one looks
at the
performance of certain «
subgroups» of kids: minorities, poor students, youngsters with disabilities and those still learning English.
It is also a good time for managers of federal programs to look closely
at one of the key
subgroups that often struggle with academic
performance: homeless students.
In fact, the most recent Texas Academic
Performance Report Data indicates these underserved
subgroups are outperforming their peers
at school districts in reading, writing, and math, demonstrating that public charter schools are working.
Rather than link school and district accountability to the percentage of student overall and
subgroup performance at these bands, the state devised a system that obfuscates actual student
performance.
She will further argue for accountability systems that look
at the growth and
performance of all students as well as
subgroups of children.
Data for
subgroups, such as children qualifying for free and reduced price lunch, children with disabilities, and children who are learning English, show lower
performance at Whitney than for similar children statewide, and Whitney's overall test based
performance and growth measured by tests is much lower than state averages.
All
subgroups with
at least 45 students must meet the state
performance target in reading and math or make Safe Harbor.
Despite for the first time taking into consideration the
performance of
subgroups like English learners, students with disabilities and those from low - income families, there is still a wide gulf between the top and bottom LA Unified middle schools
at LA Unified when it comes to their score on the California Office to Reform Education's (CORE) new school accountability index.
They also exhibited poorer
performance on early literacy, social, and behavioral measures both
at entry into Head Start and
at the end of kindergarten compared with children not in each of those
subgroups.