Sentences with phrase «at sweeping»

On your way up, make a brief stop to marvel at sweeping views of the city, the Rio - Niteroi Bridge, Guanabara Bay and Corcovado Mountain.

Marvel at the sweeping views of the Serengeti at the Maji Bar and Terrace, where refreshing cocktails accompanied by simply prepared and delicious light fare is available all day.

Such efforts may feel like small ball to a president for whom «huge» denotes high praise, but over the long haul they are likely to accomplish more than any attempts at sweeping measures.

The book emerged from the authors» study of choice programs in the schools of San Antonio, but it became an attempt at a sweeping synthesis of scholarly work on education policy, drawing on literature in philosophy, economics, political science, education, and law.

Action cinema, when proficiently made, is exceptionally effective at sweeping the audience up into some sort of non-intellectual experience.

Rhythm game studio hints at sweeping changes to approach of future titles, open to working with Activision on the «right thing.»

Over time, experts looked askance at the sweeping conclusion, which both ignored the possibility that some other theory of gravity might have better fit the results and also didn't match general relativity very precisely after known sources of error were taken into account.

Indeed, it made so many mistakes in its 16 - year rule; a notable example being its constant effort at sweeping issues of public interest under the carpet.

The partnership he has formed with Diagouraga has been incredibly efficient at sweeping up in that sitting midfield role, and despite the fact Leeds can easily be accused of not having enough attacking flair, I see both of them staying in that position next year.

When the Roe decision came down, pro-abortionists and anti-abortionists alike expressed amazement at the sweeping change that the Court had imposed upon the country.

All of this hints at the sweeping way blockchain technology could change how goods move around the world.

But if he steps back and looks at the sweep of life, he sees an obvious, indeed an overwhelming pattern.

Just on constitutional reform, which continues to be a big interest for you: looking back at the sweep of New Labour in office under Blair and now Brown, hasn't it been a big failure really on what Roy Jenkins called «breaking the mould» issues: Lib - Labbery, elected second chamber - you must be disappointed with that record.

GONYEA: I guess as you're about to open this latest film, do you, kind of, look back at the sweep of these 40 years...

Nothing screams romance as much as a dinner at Swept Away.

A respondent is defined as having «poor» mental health at sweeps 1 and / or 3 if she has a score on SF12 (MCS) which fell more than one standard deviation below the mean population score for that sweep.

Rules and routines were measured at sweeps 2 and 5.

Using information on family type (couple family or lone parent household) collected at every sweep, a variable was constructed which measured stability or changes in family type between the ages of 2 and 5 (sweeps 1 to 4).

A count of the number of «rules» or routines was derived from the following: «always» responses to question on regular meals at sweep 2, a question on regular bedtime at sweep 5 and four questions at sweep 5 on whether the child had to tidy up toys, brush teeth, stay in room, and turn off TV or music in room (using 4 - point scale - always / usually / sometimes / never or almost never).

Models adjusted for child's gender, age at sweep 5, birth order; number of children in household; mother's ethnic group, age at birth of the survey child, educational qualifications and mental health; family composition from sweeps 1 to 5, housing, household equivalised income and area deprivation.

For example, almost a quarter (27 %) of children whose mothers had good / average mental health at all sweeps had poor reported relations with their peers at 3 years of age.

It makes particular use of information from a partner questionnaire administered to fathers residing with the mother and child at sweep 2, when children were aged approximately two years old.

Partners were interviewed at home at sweep 2 (child aged 2), providing the main direct source of information from fathers (Bradshaw et al., 2008).

The warmth of mother - child relationship was measured at sweep 5 using seven items from the Pianta scale (Pianta 1992)(reliability acceptable, Cronbach alpha = 0.67).

Children's behaviour at sweep 4, when they were almost 4 years old, was assessed using the conduct and hyperactivity sub-scales of the SDQ.

In order to calculate the consistency of the measurement of maternal mental health problems between the scales, Pearson's correlation coefficient was calculated for the raw scores at each sweep.

We looked at five indicators of child disadvantage, measured at sweep 4 of GUS, including being overweight, concerns over language development, and social, emotional and behavioural problems - and explored whether persistently poor children were at greater risk of these.

As in Table 4.1, this analysis does not take account of the fact that many parenting practices may be related, and also ignores other important family influences on health, although some basic demographic factors (the child's gender, the child's age in months at sweep 5, whether the child was first born or had older siblings and the number of children in the household at sweep 5 - see earlier footnote in this chapter) are controlled for.

Whereas about two thirds (69 %) of GUS mothers had good or average health at all sweeps, almost a third (31 %) of the GUS mothers had scores which indicated that they were experiencing mental health problems at some point in the four years after the birth of the cohort baby (see Figure 3 - A).

Hence being able to look at BMI at sweep 4, particularly for the child cohort, is of interest.

Second, children who had started school at the sweep 3 interview were younger on average at school entry than were those who had started by their sweep 4 interview, and younger at the time of data collection.

Home chaos was measured at sweep 5.

Two key differences exist between these groups which may lead to differences in their scores: first, data collection with those children who started school at sweep 3 occurred, for the most part, in the first school term between August and December whereas that for the sweep 4 group occurred in the spring and summer terms.

Early mother - infant attachment was measured at sweep 1 using an abbreviated six - item version of the Condon mother - infant attachment scale (Condon and Corkindale 1998).

Moreover, it was apparent that mental health problems among the GUS cohort mothers at Sweep 1 were often associated with further episodes of poor mental health.

At sweeps 1 and 5 (ages 10 months and 58 months respectively), parental mental health was measured by the Medical Outcomes Study 12 - Item Short Form (SF - 12) mental health component.

It was clear that maternal mental health problems at Sweep 1 when the cohort baby was 10 months old and therefore beyond the immediate postnatal period usually associated with depression, were common.

Maternal mental health was assessed by GUS using two different scales: at Sweeps 1 and 3 (ages 10 months and 34 months respectively) the SF12 Mental Health Component Score (MCS) was used, whereas at Sweeps 2 and 4 (ages 22 months and 46 months respectively) selected items from the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS) were used.

Those children whose data is taken from sweep 3 were, on average, younger at school entry than were those whose primary one data was captured at sweep 4.

Harsh discipline was measured at sweeps 2 and 4 from parents» replies to questions about whether they had ever smacked their child at sweep 2, and whether they had ever smacked, or smacked in the last year, at sweep 4.

Parental supervision was measured at sweep 4 using an abbreviated version of the Parent Supervision Attributes Profile Questionnaire (Morrongiello and Corbett 2006).

For some children, primary one data was captured at sweep 3, and for others it was captured at sweep 4.

While a very small percentage reported having health problems at every sweep (permanent health problem; 1 %) or at two consecutive sweeps after sweep 1 (persistent health problem; 2 %), temporary or recurrent health problems are more common (12 %)(Table 6.1).

At sweeps 2 and 4, poor mental health is defined in relation to DASS scores which fall more than one standard deviation above the mean for the cohort.

Information on each mother's activities with their child was measured at sweeps 2, 3 and 4.

GUS research findings to date have accumulated evidence of socio - economic inequalities in child health and health behaviours, together with some evidence that parenting varies by socio - economic status, for example in relation to diet and exercise at sweep 3 (Marryat et al. 2009).

GUS has measured maternal mental health using two different scales: at sweeps 1 and 3 (ages 10 months and 34 months respectively), the SF12 Mental Health Component Score (MCS) was used, whereas at sweeps 2 and 4 (ages 22 months and 46 months respectively) selected items from the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS10) were used.

Adjusting for child gender, age in months at sweep 5, birth order and number of children in household at sweep 5.

Poor mental health at the first sweep was a strong predictor of having poor mental health scores recorded at a subsequent sweep or sweeps: two - thirds (67 %) who had poor mental health at Sweep 1 went on to have mental health problems at subsequent sweeps.

Stage 1 adjusted for child gender, age in months at sweep 5, birth order and number of children in household at sweep 5.