It appears that relational learning is something that humans, even very young humans, are much better
at than other primates.»
Not exact matches
But Laurie Santos, a cognitive psychologist
at Yale University who has shown that rhesus macaques lack an understanding of false belief, thinks the «paper raises more questions
than it provides answers,» especially because there have been «so many past results showing that chimpanzees and
other primates lack this capacity.»
«What we found is that weaning time — which acts as a measure of the prematurity of the infants — was a much better predictor of
primate's intelligence
than any of
other measures we looked
at, including brain size, which is commonly correlated with intelligence,» said Piantadosi.
There's more to these findings
than just lofty philosophical quandaries, though: If ravens really do possess a level of social cognition comparable to humans and
other large
primates, the birds might serve as better animal models to study this kind of behavior in the lab — which could help scientists understand why some humans are better
at this kind of inference
than others, and why some individuals can't manage it
at all.