Sentences with phrase «at their lowest points when»

Debbie was at her lowest point when she realized her 12 year old son, Dan, could not read or write in his Sunday school classes.

Lynn was an incredible source of strength and encouragement at some low points when I needed her the most.

It is at a low point when the body needs to calm down and relax before bed as it prepares to enter a deep, restful sleep.

You want balances at their lowest points when initially qualifying for a mortgage, and at closing time.

Not exact matches

The likelihood of the U.S. entering recession is seen at just 21 percent, its lowest level since September and down nearly 8 points from January, when fears were rampant of a slowdown.

This is the man, after all, who when asked in 1997 what he'd do as CEO of Apple, a company then at its low point, said, «What would I do?

John Betts: When I arrived in Canada four years ago, we were at a low point in terms of our market share, and when you looked at our business, clearly one of the areas where we were not connecting well was in our breakfast businWhen I arrived in Canada four years ago, we were at a low point in terms of our market share, and when you looked at our business, clearly one of the areas where we were not connecting well was in our breakfast businwhen you looked at our business, clearly one of the areas where we were not connecting well was in our breakfast business.

Yet at some point something changes: the founder gets bored, the company starts making money in a pivot that wasn't part of the original vision or even funds run low but not low enough to justify shutting the doors - especially when there's revenue involved.

If you have a new laptop, scientific calculator, or other expensive tech item on your wish list, use time to your advantage and set up price alerts now so you buy only when the price is at its lowest point.

«An integrated customer experience process within a successful customer - focused organization should know when the customers are at an emotional high or low point (both could be substantial) and what behaviors they exhibit that betray a problem or a root cause.»

Well, if we were gonna normalize interest rates, that relationship had to get restored to normal somewhere, at some point, when people were confident that we didn't need the very low interest rates and so forth.

According to Fidelity, one of the largest administrators of retirement plans in America with ~ 7 million accounts, the average IRA balance — including both traditional IRAs and Roth IRAs — stood at $ 81,100 at the end of 2012, up 53 % from 2008 when balances hit their lowest point since the market meltdown.

Interest rates are up, but there's good news: growth companies continue to win new bank financing at the robust clip they've maintained since early 1993, when rates were about a percentage point lower.

However, if / when it forms a proper base of consolidation from here, we can begin to look for a low - risk buy point (at which time we would notify Wagner Daily, subscribers of our exact entry, stop, and target prices).

Here I conclude that for anyone like me who does not travel much at all and have Freedom and Freedom Unlimited cards (both earn UR Points) the overall net benefit is more with $ 450 annual fee CSR card when compared to lower fee CSP card (Please see the math above).

When you short a security, you hold the cash proceeds from the sale in the hopes that you can buy back the shares at a lower price point and pocket the difference.

The study drew on data from nearly 6,000 millennial renters (age 18 to 34) at a time when homeownership for Americans under 35 years old is at its lowest point in the history of Census recorded data dating back to 1984.

In a diversified portfolio you use your bonds to buy stocks (or for spending purposes if taking distributions from your portfolio) when the stock market falls so you aren't forced to sell your stocks at a low point in the cycle and lock in losses.

The 30 - year average was 43 basis points (0.43 %) lower at the end of 2014 than at the beginning of that year, when the stimulus was going strong.

By having an implementation intention, you won't have to worry about making decisions when you willpower is at its lowest point of the day.

I will likely roll over that money at some point — when I'm not working and my tax rate is much lower.

Is that a philosophy, which you stand behind, could you do that from the ethic point of view, when the premium are extremely low, which is at the case... that the spreads are, as I said, between 15 and 20 basis points?

Even if your net worth is low, when the market goes up and down by a few percentage points in a day, there can be sizable dollar amounts at stake.

A combination of a lost decade and having to sell equities at low prices in order to live can diminish your portfolio — to the point where it won't recover even when the salad days return.

Warren Buffett is famous for investing when stocks are at the low point and selling when their values are high.

The study shows a steady decline since 1997 when it was at 13 percent and, predictably, it dropped to its lowest point of 6 percent in 2008 at the beginning of the financial crisis.

Fortunately, the low point was when pessimism over allegations of off - label marketing for its fentanyl opioid spray, Subsys, were at their maximum.

All I'm saying is that I experienced it when I was at a very low point in my life.

Overall satisfaction with the nominees is at its lowest point since 1992, when Bill Clinton won over George H. W. Bush.

At a time when Disney was at a creative low point and Pixar was just getting started, Dreamworks produced a real geAt a time when Disney was at a creative low point and Pixar was just getting started, Dreamworks produced a real geat a creative low point and Pixar was just getting started, Dreamworks produced a real gem.

In the end, Lecrae explains that when he's found himself at these low points, it's the teaching of Jesus that challenges him to move forward: «I am disturbed at the supremacy and disparities that still exist.

Cream room temperature butter and brown sugar together for 5 — 8 minutes / Add egg & milk mixture (w / extracts) a little at a time until fully incorporated / By hand or with mixer on lowest speed, alternately add flour and buttermilk until just incorporated — don't overmix at this point for the tenderest cake / By hand gently stir in 2 — 3 cups of rhubarb sauce so that it swirls through the batter / Place in a 9 - inch square or 10 - inch round pan coated with just a little butter and flour / Sprinkle evenly with chopped almonds (or, use local hazelnuts instead, or omit the nuts) / Bake at 325º for about an hour, until skewer comes out clean when tested / Macrina Bakery dusts the cake with powdered sugar and coarsely chopped almonds / Cake is tender until completely cooled so handle with care.

Our president's inability to condemn hatred and bigotry, his choice of wavering and mixed reactions, is astounding, even at this point when we thought he could sink no lower.

Directions: Melt butter in a large skillet over medium - low heat / Add sage leaves and cook, stirring often until butter begins to brown and the sage gives off a nutty, toasty aroma, 3 to 4 minutes / When the butter is brown and the sage is crispy and literally melts in your mouth, remove from the heat / At this point, some people give it a few squirts of cold lemon juice for extra flavor and to stop the cooking / Add lightly cooked peas, asparagus, rapini, literally any tender fresh vegetable, prosciutto, parmesan cheese, chopped herbs, whatever you have on hand.

Geoff Raby, former Australian ambassador to China, said Australia's relationship with China was at its lowest point since the Tiananmen Square massacre in 1989 when foreign governments imposed sanctions and suspended ministerial visits to China.

From mid 2013 to mid 2014 we were the best team by points when we had the lowest injurys, would just like to see this squad without the long term injuries such as Theo, Ozil, Ramsey... I think this squad, with additions to the defense and DM, at strength would compete.

Now he's weighed in on the situation at Force India, which hit a new low in the Belgian Grand Prix when Sergio Perez and Esteban Ocon made contact with each other twice, costing the team valuable points yet again.

From the moment O'Brien missed his third attempt, people questioned the decision to have him start vaulting at 15» 9» when a lower height would have given him enough points to qualify for the team.

Catching Chelsea would mean, an abundance of luck, no more injuries (When Chelsea will get crucial ones, Fabregas, Costa, Courtois and defenders as examples), a tactical enlightenment from Wenger (that would call for a miracle), beat Man United, Man City, Chelsea at Home and not waist points against Liverpool and win all the odds games against the lower teams (as well as being kicked out of the CL and not go far in the Uefa Cup as we don't have the squad to do either anyway).

Last December when Arsenal travelled to Stoke was probably one of the lowest points of Arsene Wenger's reign at the club.

The Norwegian suffered his lowest point at the club when he was substituted by Zidane at the weekend, and the team benefitted, according to Marca, as they went on to equalise after he was taken off.

why was Sanchez truly playing... no one believes he was too injured to play to start the season, and some like myself would go as far to suggest he wasn't injured at all... so why play him... they can't say it was to appease the fans because when was that ever a factor at this club except when «panic buys» were in the offing... I believe that this was to give Arsenal a little leverage when it comes to negotiating his transfer... just imagine their horrible bargaining position if Sanchez never saw the field before the deadline then heading back to South America and played for Chile... regardless of the facts, this was sadly again another example of a team putting business ahead of fielding a team with the greatest chance to secure 3 points... of course, some will say that Sanchez is, or was, our best player, so obviously he's a no - brainer to start, but those who really watch the game know that his heart hasn't been truly in it for quite some time... even at the end of last season you could see a definitive difference between the Sanchez who played for Chile and the one that played for Arsenal... that being said, 70 % of Sanchez is still better than a 100 % of the vast majority of our remaining roster... shame on you Arsene and shame on you too Sanchez for that telling smirk... I've supported your attempt to push this squad to the next level but don't pretend for a second that you didn't know you were being watched... don't lower your standards or you'll end up like this club, on the outside looking in

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Having said that, we are often at our best when up against it and proved that by responding to one of the other low points of the season, losing at home to Olympiacos, by thumping them in Athens.

He failed to make an impression at Bournemouth and on the back of one full 90 minutes against a lower division side there is a clamour for him to replace the likes of Ramsay, Xhaka and Elneny who is in my opinion the best defensive midfielder at Arsenal.Wenger is absolutely correct on this occasion when he points that it is up to Wiltshire to stake a claim to a regular midfield berth by stringing together a number of consistently good performances.I sincerely hope he can but please, no more of this hype after a 90 minute shift.

When that low level of public support caused the line to improve by at least a half - point (i.e. moving from +2.5 to +3), that team has gone 88 - 49 ATS (64.2 %) with a 25.6 % return on investment (ROI).

Over the past six years, since 2003 when SportsInsights.com started compiling «betting percentage» data, dogs have covered the point spread at a 51.1 % rate — a far cry from the low - to - mid 53 % to 55 % win - rate we saw in the early 2000's.

Up to that point, Real had taken up an almost 4 -5-1, maybe more of a 4 -1-4-1, when defending and holding a low line at the bottom of the center circle.

Chelsea suffered a real low point in their last clash with West Ham, which saw them lose 1 - 0 at the Olympic Stadium back when David Moyes and his men were in real trouble.

In the hospital when a baby dies, freebirth advocates aren't pointing the finger at the mother and the doctor and slamming them... why lower yourself to such a low level?