Not exact matches
Drew Grant, the senior designer
at my brand agency, gave me a great
analogy to illustrate habituation: «I walk
through a forest and I see trees all around me.
We understand one another, if
at all, only
through analogy.
«Equus» prompts us to look again
at the mystery of Christian faith
through the
analogy of parental, filial and professional conflicts.
One might only suggest that Equus prompts us to look again
at the mystery of Christian faith
through the
analogy of parental, filial and professional conflicts.
The principle which emerged was that of
analogy, a principle which has been employed informally
at least if not formally all
through Christian history.
What is briefly suggested here has to be sure no application to Abraham in case one might think it possible to find out by
analogy an appropriate word for Abraham to end with, but it does apply to this extent, that one thereby perceives how necessary it is that Abraham
at the last moment must carry himself
through, must not silently draw the knife, but must have a word to say, since as the father of faith he has absolute significance in a spiritual sense.
Thinking about it, the closest
analogy I can come up with is a discussion
at a party — again, strangers brought together
through a social connection, participating in a conversation by choice in a public place.
Let's look
at oil
through a historic
analogy.
Moreover, the essay makes a contribution to the question
at hand about the definition of Japanese cinema by making an
analogy with sparks and circuits, inviting the reader to ask whether Japanese cinema runs
through a short circuit of its own, or whether it can ignite other circuits with those cinemas that it interacts with, globally.
Okay, maybe that's a bit of a stretch,
analogy wise, but it will spawn a single worker script that will process
through the queue, one
at a time, only if the server isn't overloaded already (like the charts described above), and will process itself as fast as possible so it can take a break until the next batch comes in.
I'm reminded how frustrated I was
at times having to articulate this position, and have seen artists caught in the predicament; one suspects he or she avoids speaking about their work as much as possible, or else speaks
through analogies to prevent being pigeon holed, or bored.
Titled «Rock, Paper, Scissors: Positions in Play» and curated by Hammad Nasar, a curator and writer, and most recently served as Head of Research and Programmes
at Asia Art Archive, Hong Kong (2012 - 2016), this exhibition will explore a strand of artistic practice in the UAE
through the
analogy of play.
As a simple
analogy / metaphor, spending 90 % of one's time looking
through the rear vision mirror is no way to arrive
at one's desired SatNav destination safely or alive.
Looking
at how variant research programs arose, we can even draw an
analogy with sexual reproduction, for many of the best ideas came when a research program picked up an idea or tool
through intercourse with other programs.
By
analogy it is like if you observed vortexes on a fast river — their formation and frequency is the result of interactions
through the whole river but their life durations are very different —
at some places they live a very short time and
at some other places they seem to be quasi stable.
As to your response on chemistry and spectroscopy over
at WUWT (no idea what happened to your comment here, it must have been a browser problem, it's not in the comments database here
at all)- you cite «valence bond theory, -LSB-...] molecular orbital theory, -LSB-...] crystal field theory, ligand field theory, self - consistent field and X-alpha method» - none of those are based on fundamental physics, they are all phenomenological theories that work quite well for chemists, but they are not directly derived from underlying physical theory except
through very rough approximations and
analogies.
The
analogy looks good insofar as it represents the amount of IR radiation passing
through the atmosphere
at every point but it fails
at what some will consider to be the most critical point.
A bouncing ball absorbs and re-emits energy... so the
analogy is pretty good... when the balls hit the earth they bounce off in different directions... but they do bounce off... all the greenhouse effect can do is slow down the speed
at which the balls bounce off
through the atmosphere of the earth... a bit like wind resistance... the balls do not endlessly bounce backwards and forwards between the earth and the atmosphere... the balls just bounce off the earth
through the atmosphere
at a slower speed... so basically the greenhouse effect is just balls...
Externalities may be addressed by either a tax / credit or some other public policy, public ownership and management of the commons, or privatization of the commons, or
through court actions — each option may have it's own costs — for example, the large - scale privatization of the climate system may be impractical with given technology (
analogy with toll roads), and even without that, it has
at least an aesthetic cost (nature is supposed to be nature; and psychologically, humans may benifit from some amount of public space) and perhaps scientific (ie nature — in this context, nature as it is with relatively small impacts of humankind — is not nature if it is not being itself) costs; there may be inefficiencies in the court system that could be bypassed for issues that are easily addressed with legislation (unless we had a class - action lawsuit on behalf of all people now until the year).
On the road trip I mentioned in my last column, I arrived
at my topic for this column
through the
analogy of travel.