Sentences with phrase «at those answers pretty»

Not exact matches

«We already know how to reduce sexual harassment at work, and the answer is actually pretty simple: Hire and promote more women,» write the authors.

More research is needed to answer definitively, but Kraus suggests that the explanation might simply be that we're all pretty practiced actors who are relatively adept at keeping our true emotions off our faces.

I put the question to Henry Aaron, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, and got pretty much the answer I expected: it doesn't matter.

I ALREADY know the answer... that's why I said what I said earlier... at MY place of worship (CHURCH by the way) pretty much everyone is liberal about that... cause they have recognized they have ability to tune people out

By the time I was a teenager at the Jesus camps, pledging my life to being a warrior in God's culture army, I had memorized Bible verses as answers, and developed a pretty major evangelical hero complex along with my superiority and false sense of control.

The confusion for me, again even as a little kid (ages 9 - 11 particularly, at a time when I was quite the believer even), was that all the other religions pretty much said the same thing... prayers answered, miracle cures, and with the same back up, that «unanswered» prayers were either an answer, «no» or «not yet»... OR... the person asking didn't have the right heart, or didn't ask for the right thing, or asked the wrong way, etc..

At Hemant's request, I tried to come up with my own interpretation before looking at the answer, and I was interested to see that it was pretty starkly close to the one you say you intendeAt Hemant's request, I tried to come up with my own interpretation before looking at the answer, and I was interested to see that it was pretty starkly close to the one you say you intendeat the answer, and I was interested to see that it was pretty starkly close to the one you say you intended.

My mom couldn't remember how she answered the «2 bunny» question, although I'm pretty sure that whatever she said was convincing to a kid at the time.

When armchair amateurs actually genuinely believe that they have all the answers to matters which hundreds and thousands of other professional and experts at football clubs all around the world are working on 24/7 to resolve then you can be pretty sure these looney - tunes are clueless or delusional — probably both, and over-dosing on childish self - entitlement.

It's pretty clear at this point that it's going to be tough to get anyone from the Patriots to answer any more questions about the scandal or its investigation, at least in the media.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

If you've ever wondered why not, then this footage from a Formula Vee race at the Barbagallo circuit in Australia should give you a pretty clear answer.

A quick glance at the Premier League table gives a pretty conclusive answer.

If, at 6PM (on the rare day we see her at that time), I ask her how her day went, the answer is pretty curt.

«Yeah, we know your child's math teacher is pretty horrible, but at least he doesn't beat them with a ruler if they get the answer wrong»?

Pressler's insurgent candidacy pretty much answers something we were wondering about here at Uncovered Politics more than four -LSB-...]

«The fact that we found the same brain processing between believers and nonbelievers, despite the two groups» completely different answers to the questions [about religion], is pretty surprising,» says Jonas Kaplan, a research psychologist at U.C.L.A. and co-author of the study.

If you're like me and want definitive answers to pretty much all of your nutrition questions for packing on muscle and / or burning some fat (at the same time), read this Somanabolic Muscle Maximizer review.

Someone recently asked me if my style has changed at all through the years and my answer was «No, my style has pretty much stayed the same.»

This may seem pretty restrictive at first, after all how will potential love matches learn about you and your lifestyle if you haven't taken the time to answer any questions about yourself?

Q. Regarding your recent Answer Man item on interspecies dating in Disney cartoons: I'm sure I won't be the first to point out that while Disney tends to keep things pretty strict, over at Warner Bros., it's «Toons Gone Wild.»

Pᴀᴜʟsᴛᴇʀ2's answer is pretty much correct, at least for Toyotas (the linked post in the OP was for a Lexus aka Toyota).

We don't answer because we're not used to adults asking us anything; we just look at the woman, at her fierce hair, at her skirt that sweeps the ground when she walks, at her pretty peeking feet, at her golden Africa, at her large eyes, at her smooth skin that doesn't even have a scar to show she is a living person, at the earring on her nose, at her T - shirt that says, Save Darfur.

Since this is a Japanese word that has been adopted by many languages, including English, there is no one «right» answer, but here at VIZ Media we pronounce it «mahn - gah,» which is pretty close to the original Japanese pronunciation.

-- though at the rate you're going I'm pretty sure you'll provide me the answers before I can ask the questions

When we dug deeper, the data led us to a pretty simple answer, which we'll circle back to at the end of the report.

If you really look at both of those charts and think about which one is easier to analyze and trade from, the answer should be pretty clear.

There's no definitive answer on what the optimal asset allocation is, but you still can have a pretty good idea by taking a look at how the so - called lifecycle funds, or target - date funds, invest their money based on a targeted retirement year.

There was a long Q&A, which she did pretty well at answering.

Answer: I'm not at my office to look at the label but I'm pretty sure Drontal isn't labeled for pregnant or nursing cats (most things aren't just because they haven't been tested on them or can't complete a trial because they aren't pregnant or lactate for long enough to complete the testing).

They muck cages, change litter, tackle a mountain of laundry, answer phones, tally statistics, write grants, take photographs, write up animal stories, build kitty trees, fix the roof, schlep «stuff», paint the building, plan and produce fundraisers, walk in parades, work at events to promote the Shelter, make signs, decorate and clean our facility, take animals to and from the veterinarian, take complaints about animal abuse, make visits to talk with people about humane animal care, and pretty much anything else we need to keep this operation running.

The answers to those questions may be hard to pinpoint, exactly, but we can establish a pretty good baseline by taking a look at what other countries around the globe are doing in terms of their handling and sheltering of homeless dogs and cats.

It's even better, though, when the devs come out to the big wide world and are willing to answer pretty much anything thrown at them by the general public.

Well, your prayers are answered, because The Twin Snakes makes Metal Gear Solid even more bonkers (if you can believe it) and much prettier to look at.

Alistair I suspect that part of the answer is that weathermen, as a general rule, have a pretty limited background in science (at least as evidenced by what comes out of the mouths of those on CNN and the various news stations around DC) and expecting them to be able to explain what is causing climate change would be sort of like expecting an EMT to explain brain surgery.

The answer to this, I say at risk of getting yelled at by a lot of my colleagues in the green world, is pretty clearly No.

A journalist could make initial headway asking about his «corrupt skeptics» accusation, which might yield a friendly answer or two about it being «well documented» or «discovered by a Pulitzer - Winning reporter,» but if the journalist persists, pointing out how the accusation is not at all well documented, and how this traces back to a person who never won a Pulitzer, and then wonders about why Gore would say this person discovered leaked memos that he already possessed, it is a sure bet that Gore will gesture to the exit pretty much this way:

I didn't say so, but at the time while I wished he had answered some more questions, I thought the failure to acknowledge Hu was pretty low and the only black mark on his behavior.

The big answer in that long quote, the one that stands at the source of pretty much every environmental problem we now face, is right in the middle in italics.

The second answer is contained in your own post — by making different assumptions, an economist can arrive at pretty much whatever answer his preconceptions desire.

, but she admitted that, when she received an actual research assignment at the firm, she often didn't even understand the issue, let alone what she should be looking for to answer it.52 And, of course, this rendered her ability to gather information on LexisNexis pretty useless.

The answer to that question is pretty obvious to most people but just in case there is anyone who doesn't know let us look at the what this policy provides.

Now depending upon how you answered these questions the insurance company will general have a pretty good idea if you'll be able to qualify for a traditional term or whole life insurance policy or if we need to take a look at an alternative insurance product that won't take one's health into consideration.

Costing $ 35, the Genie is a little bigger than Amazon's Echo Dot, which retails at $ 50, but claims to offer stronger bass and double the volume of Amazon's equivalent device thanks to a 2W speaker.The Genie's list of features pretty much tallies with Echo Dot's abilities, so it can play music, control other smart home devices, order products, answer questions, set calendars, report the weather and news, and more.According to Anker, it's also possible to use the Amazon Alexa app with the Genie to access over 10,000 skills and services, such as Pandora, Domino's Pizza, Uber, ESPN, NPR News, and more.

Taking an average of the three answers or using the worst case as a basis is pretty sensible, unless you turn up for a bus that you understand may arrive between 4.50 - 7.30 am and it arrives at 7.30 am.

At first this may seem like a pretty scary question but once you understand that it's just another chance to show your strengths, it will become much easier to answer.

I hope that there is, because as the education delivery system of today shows, only the truly motivated - to - learn students seem to get it, at least for as long as it takes to retain information long enough to correctly answer exam questions within a week of the last refresher course wherein the exam questions are pretty much given away.

I'm pretty well versed already on general land lording laws, and some of my state specific laws as well, but I feel at some point I will definitely need one to answer any other legal questions or concerns which may arise in the buying process.