Sentences with phrase «at valid conclusions»

Work with other law enforcement agents and analysts to arrive at valid conclusions on the outcome of tests

They may also assist law enforcement agents in analyzing available information on crime suspects so as to arrive at valid conclusions.

Then again, his epistemology is probably too flawed for him to arrive at a valid conclusion on any thing, much less astrophysics.

Not exact matches

Musk should look at the team Trump has put in charge of the country's climate - and - energy future and draw the obvious conclusions: Valid climate science is now officially under siege, and sustainable or renewable energy sources are about to lose out big - time to Big Oil.

If, as many seem to think, neo-Darwinism serves as a valid «design - defeating hypothesis» at the level of human reason but is rescued from any ultimately improper conclusions only by the intervention of theology, then it seems that my expansive definition is fully vindicated.

Age at marriage may be a risk factor with respect to divorce, but perhaps the more valid conclusion is in the opposite direction, that high divorce rates scare couples away from early marriage.

We are afraid that our valid, limited, friendly criticism, when voiced, will help prepare people psychologically to accept the conclusions offered at the savage extreme.

Plain men and philosophers have sought for a valid concept of the good, have been perplexed by the search, and have arrived at many different conclusions.

I suspect this is another example of looking at very complex issues (i.e. child obesity) by breaking them down into component pieces (e.g. the menu in the school cafeteria, or the amount of exercise conducted per day, or the local socio - economic conditions, or what phase of the moon it is) and trying to reach some sort of valid conclusion.

Modern mainstream economic theory argues from so - called «universal» principles, to arrive at universally «valid» conclusions.

Sensitive and valid screening methods should also be developed to identify the patients who may be at risk for verbal mistreatment and identify patients that are currently experiencing some form of verbal mistreatment,» as explained in the conclusion.

First of all, 44 observations is a very small sample, so drawing any strong, statistically valid conclusions is at best difficult, at worst misleading.

And I'm wondering if there is a way of looking at an incident of theft and being able to draw conclusions that are scientifically valid about whether or not that could have been prevented by conducting a particular pre-employment screen or check.

Once I came to the conclusion that there was no valid reason for most yearly pet vaccines — and there was a possibility that vaccines could trigger the development of serious diseases — I felt I could no longer work at a conventional veterinary clinic.

But you also said, «But let me try and make it even clearer: consensus by a vote of qualified scientists is not a valid basis for arriving at a logical, scientific conclusions about AGW — that's true» You have clearly contradicted yourself.

It's the mass of all the evidence, all the inference, all the work to simplify the assumptions needed to draw valid conclusions, all the efforts at parsimony of exceptions, all the care to ensure the universality of the explanation that is most accurate, and therefore most nearly true based on all we know that is what proves AGW, and disproves the Stadium Wave.

In recent discussion of the Weblog 2007 Awards, several commenters at other blogs have argued that our criticisms of the Mannian parlor tricks have been «thoroughly refuted and discarded by climatologists, published in a credible journal»; that «other professionals in the field who also have «looked in great detail at the problem at hand» and have come to the conclusion that rather than McIntyre's findings being «valid and relevant», they instead have found them to be «without statistical and climatological merit»; that CA «fluffed on the whole hockey stick thing».

My risk management expertise suggests that for AGW to be valid requires a multiplication of the three risks to result in a high value, eg IPCC puts the first at 100 percent and the second two combined at greater than 90 percent, giving a «very likely» conclusion.

Since Jelbring explicitly states that he is waiting a very long time for relaxation to occur and did not inconsistently qualify his use of an ideal gas by asserting that it is non-conductive (and because there is no substantive difference between my vertically confined gas column and his vertically confined gas column, at this point we all agree that my arguments against EEJ are valid and the stated conclusion of his thought experiment is incorrect.

Taken together, these two papers (and several similar ones, at least) should convince anyone that «A fundamental and societally relevant conclusion from these studies is that the use of the IPCC model predictions as a basis for policy making is» a valid and reasonable approach.

In terms of greenhouse agents, the main conclusions from the WGI FAR Policymakers Summary are still valid today: (1) «emissions resulting from human activities are substantially increasing the atmospheric concentrations of the greenhouse gases: CO2, CH4, CFCs, N2O»; (2) «some gases are potentially more effective (at greenhouse warming)»; (3) feedbacks between the carbon cycle, ecosystems and atmospheric greenhouse gases in a warmer world will affect CO2 abundances; and (4) GWPs provide a metric for comparing the climatic impact of different greenhouse gases, one that integrates both the radiative influence and biogeochemical cycles.

It acknowledged there were valid arguments on both sides of the issue but preferred the conclusion that the expiration of the limitation period for P's hypothetical damages action against D2 — hypothetical because P did not sue D2 in time or did not sue D1 at all — did not provide D2 a defence to D1's contribution claim.

In conclusion, the exclusives argument (From the console side, at least) really isn't a valid one.

The findings, conclusions and recommendations generated through this study should be of interest to educators in the field of early childhood programs for at - risk populations as a means to lend credence to the need for parenting education programs as a valid component in these programs.