My kids chose
atheism over religion when presented with arguments for both.
Not exact matches
This isn't about that though, this is more a lesson in how both
religion and
atheism together can be equally guilty of scamming people out of donations and book sales
over trivial and distorted teachings.
you sir are practicing a
religion one that means so much to you that you use it as your online name also please show me where I call you a fool or is telling someone not to make a fool of themself the same as calling them a fool which would mean you are very religious as far as Colin he said nothing that related to the debate I was in with you... we are talking about
Atheism as a religious view not debating the existence of God now look
over the definitions I have shown you and please explain how
Atheism does not fit into the said definitions And you claim that evolution is true so the burden of proof falls in your lap as it is the base of your
religion.
That being said I'm completely
over religion at this point in my life, including militant
atheism which has become its very own little
religion as well, in case you hadn't noticed.
Nope, I guess you accept that Dawkins doesn't treat
atheism like a
religion since you passed
over the point.
= > nonsense as
atheism has resulted in the deaths of
over 50 million in the last century alone, and it has been shown that «
religion» (that's all
religions) have only been responsible for 7 % of ALL wars to date (which would mean approximately 25 million in the past 2000 years)
Passing
over the fact that calling
atheism a
religion is a contradiction in terms, whats the point of your statement?
I would like to see an atheist or a Wiccan elected president, not because I'm advocating
atheism (I'm not) nor because I'm a witch (I'm not), but because it might signal and end to these ridiculous and unproductive brouhahas
over religion.
Do you really want me to go
over exactly how
atheism can not be a
religion or can it suffice to say that
atheism is a rejection of
religion itself and nothing more.
Through these accounts, Schmidt intends to give us a popular, social history of American
atheism, one that tells stories of local, concrete fights
over religion and the public sphere, rather than a grand history of ideas about belief and disbelief.
American
atheism is a form of rationalism that is against all forms of religious control; including the control of the American state
religion (christianity)
over how we publicly deal with death.
With the dramatic growth of the nonreligious in the last few decades, more atheist leaders are emerging as spokespeople for
atheism, but the Christmas rift speaks to growing disagreement
over how atheists should treat
religion.
Isn't
atheism supposed to be better than
religions because they've grown up beyond such things, and they don't hurt people
over their beliefs.
The arguments
over atheism vs.
religion are always the same.