Not exact matches
I have never found that
atheists are very
moral people, actually most I have known have
been liars and hostile individuals.
How do
atheists explain the obvious benefit, both economically, educationally, socially, and spiritually, that America receives when its
people are walking with God, ministering through church and missions, and creating and basing laws and
moral conduct on Biblical teachings?
I
am the mother of 3 children and
am an
atheist (and a
moral, law abiding, kind, charitable
person like most other of my fellow humans regardless of religious affiliation).
Well, I guess
atheists lose, then, as they all lazily sit back, drink alcohol, smoke weed, and bully
people of religion, calling them hypocrites while not showing their own
moral standards so that their own hypocrisy can
be judged.
If you would ask any
atheist what their
moral system
is, the answer always comes back as «I don't do to other
people, what I would not want done to me».
Atheists can
be exceptionally
moral people and religious fanatics can
be some the the most self - serving amoral
people on earth.
Atheists, in almost every measurable way,
are more
moral people.
Atheists simply have their natural instincts of empathy less - adjusted than religious
people and so, generally
are more
moral.
One of the most insulting assumptions of many religious
persons is that agnostics /
atheists are incapable of having
morals.
As an
atheist I make no claims of
moral superiority or that God
is helping me to
be a better
person.
People's
moral and civil rights
are nowadays subjected to mundane abuses of Federalism, the father of adoption's secularism and divorcee of theocracy whose many so many autocrats
are of the abolitionists within Christendom's creeds of embittered many; now marrying into the servile
atheists euphemisms giving rises to the ever damned younger infidels of socially perverse and vulgar demeaning pragmatisms via emotionalized pleasurable natures, leading down the future's committed vile systems of embittered communalisms reaping the awaiting harbingers» coming wraths of despotisms accruals.
at the end of the day i'd rather have an agnostic or
atheist as president than someone who believes in some fairy tale, or thinks that god tells
people what to do, or that religion
is necessary for
morals.
Atheists can't explain why in a situation with two
people who disagree on
morals, one
person can
be wrong, and one
person can
be right.
A
person who thinks you can not
be an
atheist and not have a
moral compass?
Atheists are just as
moral as religious
people.
10 / 10...
Atheist... Where faith begins, common sense ends... Religion
is good for only one thing... TO START WARS... Who says you need a «God» to
be a good
person with
morals and common sense????... Get a grip... Who said He
is everywhere??
I personally never consider religion or
atheist or secularism when making a
moral choice, and I
am certainly not trying to prove I don't need religion to
be a good
person.
Later I did stop going to Church but also never joined a gang — moved on from that neighborhood FYI — If this all puzles u, even as an
Atheist my
morals are as strong and probably stronger than those of most religious
people.
i wouldnt trust a damn one of them to tell me the truth about anything... As an
atheist, i do nt beleive «god» will strike me down if i lie, or have no
morals, but i do have to live with myself, i like to think i
am a good
person...
Atheists are just as
moral as religious
people as a result, because we
are all
people and function the same way.
Happy Jack — I didn't say there
was a set of established
morals for
Atheists, in fact i noted that there
was NOT a set of
morals, if you want to know if
Atheists have
morals and where they come from you'd probably have to ask an
atheist, my post
was simply pointing to the fact that the dictators i
was talking about did not have a specific set of
morals telling them that Murdering millions of
people was wrong.
As for Pastor Mike and his
atheist registry, like so many other strongly religious
people I've encountered, he
's equating religion with morality, as if, without religious belief (the right religious belief), you
are incapable of possessing and living by a
moral / ethical code.
Outwardly, an
atheist's conduct may
be more «
moral» than a
person who claims to believe but
is a hypocrite, but keeping the rules doesn't make one necessarily close to God.
Has Harris really thought about what would happen if
people adopted the hard - core
atheist's belief that there
is no transcendent basis for our
moral valuations?
But although
atheists might argue that a «disbelief in the immateriality or immortality of the soul» would not «make a
person less caring, less
moral, less committed to the well -
being of everybody on Earth,» A. F. Christian
is quick to point out the evidence to the contrary.
From what I've seen, there isn't much difference in religious
people and
atheists because majority of
atheists come from religious backgrounds (parents, grandparents), so their
moral system
is something inherited from them.
Atheists have to stop saying they
are moral & they
are logical & then claiming
people who disagree
are wrong.
You
're implying that an
atheist can not
be a
moral person, which
is absolutely not true.
With all due respect, as an
Atheist, I
am far more level headed, rational and have more
morals than many
people who
are believers.
Obviously, not... as many, many
atheists are good upstanding
moral and ethical
people... and... «do good for the sake of doing good.»
Another reason
is that your
morals will never
be the exact same as another
person's — even between two
atheists.
Like many
atheists (who
are generally lovely
moral people like my father, who would refuse to enter heaven and instead wait outside with his Miles Davis LPs), I started out snarky and defensive about religion, but eventually came to think it
was probably nice for
people of faith to have faith.