The obvious conclusion is that if we are significantly changing how the planet
atmosphere absorbs radiation and we don't have a clue about the effects, then we should be very afraid.
Soot particles in
the atmosphere absorb radiation, but studies suggest their effect on cloud cover and thickness may promote an overall net cooling.
Whereabouts are those early 1950s precision measurements to be found which demonstrate that adding more carbon dioxide really would change how
the atmosphere absorbed radiation?
Not exact matches
Darin Toohey, a professor at the University of Colorado's atmospheric and oceanic sciences department and one of the paper's authors, says black carbon
absorbs shortwave
radiation from the sun, causing the
atmosphere to heat up.
The feeble glow of microwaves from the sun is
absorbed by our air on the way down, anyway, so unless the core somehow also strips off Earth's
atmosphere — in which case we have bigger problems than solar
radiation — we should be safe enough from microwaves if our planet's center stops spinning.
This involves determining the composition of a planetary
atmosphere by measuring its spectra, the distinctive
radiation that gases
absorb at their own particular wavelengths.
Four - pronged impact Like carbon dioxide, black carbon
absorbs sunlight and infrared
radiation, trapping heat in the
atmosphere — including the boundary layer closest to Earth's surface.
Geoengineering schemes use two ways to offset this process: They either remove the gases from the
atmosphere, allowing more
radiation to exit, or deflect a portion of the sun's light — about 1.8 percent should do the trick — reducing the amount of
radiation absorbed by the earth.
When these gamma rays reach the Earth's
atmosphere they are
absorbed, producing a short - lived shower of secondary particles that emit weak flashes of bluish light known as Cherenkov
radiation, lasting just a few billionths of a second.
The team also presented the first observational evidence that WASP - 33b's
atmosphere contains titanium oxide, one of only a few compounds that is a strong
absorber of visible and ultraviolet
radiation and capable of remaining in gaseous form in an
atmosphere as hot as this one.
These so - called starbursts are difficult to observe from Earth, as their dusty shrouds
absorb much of the optical light from the stars and re-radiate it as longer - wavelength
radiation to which Earth's
atmosphere is mostly opaque.
Black carbon warms the
atmosphere because of its ability to
absorb radiation from the sun, but its effect can be especially pernicious in polar regions, where, falling on bright ice, the soot diminishes the regions» ability to reflect away heat.
The formation of a stratosphere layer in a planet's
atmosphere is attributed to «sunscreen» - like molecules, which
absorb UV and visible
radiation coming from the star and then release that energy as heat.
At some of these overlaps, the
atmosphere already
absorbs 100 % of
radiation, meaning that adding more greenhouse gases can not increase absorption at these specific frequencies.
A: Global warming occurs when carbon dioxide (CO2) and other air pollutants and greenhouse gases collect in the
atmosphere and
absorb sunlight and solar
radiation that have bounced off the earth's surface.
Most types of electromagnetic
radiation, except for visible light and radio waves, are
absorbed by the Earth's
atmosphere.
Because X-ray
radiation is
absorbed in Earth's
atmosphere, space - based instruments are necessary to study it.
It's not totally about how much infrared from the surface that is blocked (currently about 90 % of surface emissions is
absorbed by greenhouse gases), its also about the height within the
atmosphere from which
radiation escapes.
The formation of a stratosphere layer in a planet's
atmosphere is attributed to «sunscreen» - like molecules, which
absorb ultraviolet (UV) and visible
radiation coming from the star and then release that energy as heat.
Under ultraviolet light examination, transient dark and bright stripes mark Venus»
atmosphere, indicating regions where Solar ultraviolet
radiation is either
absorbed or reflected, respectively (more from Venus Express and APOD).
An ice - free Arctic Ocean
absorbs solar
radiation during the long summer days, and evaporates more water into the Arctic
atmosphere.
Whether being lesser than CO2 in number of molecules in the
atmosphere, methane is a potent greenhouse gas
absorbing more infra - red
radiation per molecule than CO2.
However, Earth's
atmosphere complicates matters, because it
absorbs most of the
radiation.
The shorter wavelengths of IR
radiation can penetrate the
atmosphere, but as its wavelength reaches one micrometre, IR
radiation tends to be
absorbed by water vapour and other molecules in the
atmosphere.
The amounts that are in Pluto's
atmosphere are enough to
absorb infrared
radiation (heat) from the sun and warm the upper
atmosphere.
If the surface plus
atmosphere together acts as a gray body at 288 K with e = 0.61, then only 61 % of incoming solar
radiation at thermal infrared wavelengths (a small fraction of the total) will be
absorbed.
So with more carbon dioxide in the
atmosphere, we expect to see less longwave
radiation escaping to space at the wavelengths that carbon dioxide
absorb.
14 C is produced by thermal neutrons from cosmic
radiation in the upper
atmosphere, and is transported down to earth to be
absorbed by living biological material.
Much of this
radiation is returned to the space and the other part is
absorbed by the layer of gas surrounding
atmosphere causing the greenhouse effect.
ABM: The whole point about the greenhouse gases in a planetary
atmosphere is that they
absorb the infrared
radiation emitted by the surface, and so Kirchhoff's law does not apply.
So I agree with William, the cooling effect at the top of the
atmosphere requires that the
atmosphere be
absorbing some incoming
radiation (and that this absorption be (mostly) by non-greenhouse gasses).
Isn't one important feature of cooling the stratosphere by emitting heat
absorbed by ozone from incoming shortwave
radiation, that this cooling has little effect on lower parts of the
atmosphere since there is not much mixing between these air masses?
Second even if we ignore convection (and assume all warming of the
atmosphere is from below, ie no incoming solar
radiation is
absorbed in the
atmosphere) it is not the case that the
atmosphere temperatures will «pivot» around some fixed level (increasing below it and falling above it).
The
radiation is not
absorbed throughout the full height of the
atmosphere, passing through it rather like an electric current through a conductor.
If we are talking about clear
atmosphere, then no, because the
radiation will be ONLY at exactly those frequencies where the greenhouse gases above and below
absorb / emit.
Barton, For the
atmosphere to be in thermodynamic equilibrium, the greenhouse gases must be emitting as much
radiation as they
absorb.
Suppose further that a fraction «a» of the incoming shortwave
radiation is
absorbed in the
atmosphere (with the remainder being
absorbed by the ground).
Hypothesis A — Because the atmospheric
radiation is completely
absorbed in the first few microns it will cause evaporation of the surface layer, which takes away the energy from the back
radiation as latent heat into the
atmosphere.
This knowledge is not new; the same year as Charles Darwin published «The Origin of Species», John Tyndall, an Irish scientist, published a paper in 1859 describing how he measured the absorption of infrared
radiation in his laboratory, finding that CO2 and water vapour
absorbed the
radiation, whereas nitrogen and oxygen, the main gases in the
atmosphere, do not.
If there is more CO2 in the
atmosphere then more of the outgoing LW
radiation will be
absorbed by the CO2.
Of the energy
absorbed by the ocean, most is released locally to the
atmosphere, mostly by evaporation and infrared
radiation...
The imbalance is not between IR
absorbed and IR emitted by a layer of
atmosphere, but between the incoming shortwave solar energy from space and the outgoing longwave energy emitted to space, due to the increasing difference between the ground temperature and the temperature of the level from which re-emitted
radiation can escape to space.
Words only have meaning in context and while it may be true that water vapor is a greenhouse gas in the sense that more of it in the
atmosphere will
absorb more infrared
radiation and warm the climate, it is not a greenhouse gas in the sense that it is a gas we need to seriously worry about adding directly to the
atmosphere.
In the presence of an
atmosphere (which
absorbs / emits in the thermal IR
radiation) the picture is different.
CO2 (and some other gases) in the
atmosphere are however more opaque to LWIR; they
absorb that a chunk of that outgoing
radiation and re-radiate it in all directions — so that a fraction less than half is re-radiated downwards; which has the effect of slowing the transfer of heat (by
radiation) out of the
atmosphere.
ie does a slightly lower density of air mean a slightly lower ground level temperature (temperature normally decreases with height at the lower air density), so that in reality adding CO2 and subtracting more O2 actually causes miniscule or trivial global COOLING, and the (unused) ability of the changed
atmosphere to
absorb radiation energy and transmit it to the rest of the air is overruled or limited by the ideal gas law?
Less TOA cooling will occur if bands are placed where, in the upper
atmosphere or near TOA, they
absorb more of the increases in
radiation from below from surface + tropospheric (+ lower stratospheric) warming.
With some LW
absorbing optical thickness, the
atmosphere can emit
radiation to space, so some heat will flow into the
atmosphere from where solar heating occurs to get to space.
1) Greenhouse gasses
absorb infrared
radiation in the
atmosphere and re-emit much of it back toward the surface, thus warming the planet (less heat escapes; Fourier, 1824).
In reply to # 1, greenhouse gases
absorb selective bands of
radiation in the
atmosphere and re-radiate them in all directions as longer wave infrared.