Sentences with phrase «atmosphere holding more water»

Extreme precipitation is likely when a storm passes through a warmer atmosphere holding more water.

However, this doesn't account for feedbacks, for example ice melting and making the planet less reflective, and the warmer atmosphere holding more water vapor (another greenhouse gas).

Rahmstorf said in a follow up email that this is just basic physics, citing the Clausius - Clapeyron equation, which shows that the atmosphere holds more water vapor when it is warmer, setting the stage for more rainfall.

He will not glean any disunity because the contributors to this forum are by and large scientists who understand the psychics behind global warming as thoroughly and well as; why does ice expand when heated; or why can warm atmosphere hold more water vapour than cold.

A warmer atmosphere holds more water vapor, which is shifting the odds toward more intense rainstorms.

[7][8] A warmer atmosphere holds more water vapor, feeding more precipitation into all storms including hurricanes, significantly amplifying extreme rainfall and increasing the risk of flooding.

Physically, a warmer atmosphere holds more water vapor that can enhance moisture convergence and rainfall rates in storm systems such as hurricanes.

Not exact matches

Nutiva is focused on regenerative agriculture so it can sequester carbon from the atmosphere and oceans, putting it into the soil so the soil can hold more water, use less fertilizer and enhance nutritional elements in foods.

But by the same token, as global temperatures rise, the atmosphere can hold more water vapor.

A rather straightforward calculation showed that doubling the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere... which would arrive in the late 21st century if no steps were taken to curb emissions... should raise the temperature of the surface roughly one degree C. However, a warmer atmosphere would hold more water vapor, which ought to cause another degree or so of warming.

One thing is already clear: A warmer global atmosphere currently holds about 3 to 5 percent more water vapor than it did at the beginning of the 20th century, and that can contribute to heavier precipitation.

Indeed, conventional wisdom held that higher levels of aerosol pollution in the atmosphere should cool the earth's climate because aerosols can increase cloudiness; they not only reduce precipitation, which raises the water content in clouds, but they also increase the size of the individual water droplets, which in turn causes more warming sunlight to be reflected back into space.

By analyzing global water vapor and temperature satellite data for the lower atmosphere, Texas A&M University atmospheric scientist Andrew Dessler and his colleagues found that warming driven by carbon dioxide and other gases allowed the air to hold more moisture, increasing the amount of water vapor in the atmosphere.

This is because not only does the higher water - holding capacity lead to increased rainfall, but climate change makes the atmosphere more favourable to low - pressure systems bringing rain from the Atlantic across southern England.»

The authors found that this increase resulted in part from the ability of a warmer atmosphere to hold more water.

MAUNA KEA, HI — A primitive ocean on Mars once held more water than Earth's Arctic Ocean, according to NASA scientists who measured signatures of water in the planet's atmosphere using the most powerful telescopes on Earth including the W. M. Keck Observatory in Hawaii.

For every 1 °F increase in temperature, the atmosphere can hold around 4 percent more water vapor, which leads to heavier rain and increases the risk of flooding of rivers and streams.

For every 1 °F of temperature increase, the atmosphere can effectively hold 4 percent more water vapor.

In 2012, a controversial study challenged previously accepted ideas about the mechanisms through which climate change will affect our weather: Warmer temperatures will result in more heat waves, hotter summers will bring worse droughts, the warmer atmosphere will hold more water, resulting in heavier precipitation and flooding.

However, the surface warming caused by human - produced increases in carbon dioxide, methane, and other greenhouse gases leads to a large increase in water vapor, since a warmer atmosphere holds more moisture.

I presume this is because a warmer atmosphere can hold more water vapor, and that rain (or snow) has to come down somewhere.

Anything that «holds up» the temperature, whether it be CO2 or changes in solar brightness, allows the atmosphere to hold more water.

you said yourself «Anything that «holds up» the temperature, whether it be CO2 or changes in solar brightness, allows the atmosphere to hold more water....»

With hotter temperatures, more water evaporates off the oceans, and the atmosphere can hold more moisture.

it thought it has been demonstrated that the atmosphere holds 4 % more water vapour now then it did at the start of the 20th century and that 2010 has had the heaviest rainfall globally.

But there are solid physical reasons to expect acceleration — the radiative imbalance is growing along with the concentrations of GHGs; we are shedding reflective ice from the cryosphere; our warming atmosphere is holding more water vapor, a potent GHG; and we are melting permafrost and frozen soils to release methane.

As the atmosphere warms it can hold more water; that additional water vapor provides more of the warming than is directl caused by CO2.

So a local spike in precipitation releases a lot of heat — but as the heat increases, this negatively affects the vapor - > water transition (precipitation, or raindrop formation), since warm air holds more water then cool air — and so the limit on precipitation vis - a-vis the radiative balance of the atmosphere appears.

Warmer air holds more water vapor than colder air, so the amount of water vapor in the lower atmosphere increases as it is warmed by the greenhouse effect.

The increased warmth allows the atmosphere to hold more water vapour so that total atmospheric density increases and the atmospheric greenhouse effect strengthens.

The atmosphere could hold much more water vapor than it does.

Hence the atmosphere can hold more water.

1) Prove that the atmosphere could hold much more water vapor than it does.

It is generally accepted that a warmer climate will result in more water evaporating from the land and sea and therefore resulting in a higher level of water in the atmosphere, partly because the warmer the air is the more water it can hold.

With hotter temperatures, more water evaporates off the oceans, and the atmosphere can hold more moisture.

The limit of water the atmosphere can hold suddenly gets a lot more complicated and this is the part they don't understand well enough to get their theory and models working.

This causes the atmosphere to hold more water vapor, which leads to heavier downpours.

For example, the CO2 - induced global warming allows the atmosphere to hold more water vapor.

But air temperature would increase significantly, and entire atmosphere could hold many factors more water, so in about century, all ice caps could be gone.

Accordingly, changes in temperature and the water holding capacity of the atmosphere are more robust than changes that depend on winds in any way.

First, there's the well - known fact that a warmer atmosphere can hold more water vapor, meaning more moisture can be wrung out of the clouds when it does rain.

Lets confuse the issue more: «One of the fundamental aspects of global warming is that it increases the amount of moisture in the atmosphere, because warmer air holds more water vapor.»

For every extra degree (Cº) of warming, the atmosphere holds about 7 % more water vapour.

The oceans, though, hold much more heat than the atmosphere; e.g. the top 15 cm (6 inches) of ocean waters contain more heat than the entire atmosphere.

A warmer atmosphere can hold more water vapour.

The atmosphere now holds 4 % more water vapour than it did 40 years ago as a result of increasing temperatures.

One of the most likely byproducts of global warming is more extreme precipitation events, as warmer temperatures can hold more water vapor in the atmosphere.

The revised statement is more sensible, but I would suggest you critically examine your concept of «distorting markets» particularly as regards what economists term «unowned resources,» such as a breathable atmosphere, fields or forests held in common (as in the original «Tragedy of the Commons»), stocks of fish in the ocean, or drinking water from lakes and rivers.

When it comes down it comes down with greater intensity as the atmosphere heats and is able to hold more water.

The atmosphere grows moister because warmer air can hold more water vapor, which absorbs more shortwave radiation.