Scientists from these agencies will undertake programs in climate modelling,
atmosphere radiation measurement, atmospheric science, the terrestrial carbon cycle, the ocean carbon cycle, and ecosystem research program, and finally will produce an integrated assessment, according to Dr. Raymond Orbach, the Energy Department's director of the Office of Science.
Not exact matches
For instance, taking one of the two examples mentioned above, the
radiation code can be tested against field
measurements at specific times and places where the composition of the
atmosphere is known alongside a line - by - line code.
The work is an estimate of the global average based on a single - column, time - average model of the
atmosphere and surface (with some approximations — e.g. the surface is not truly a perfect blackbody in the LW (long - wave) portion of the spectrum (the wavelengths dominated by terrestrial / atmospheric emission, as opposed to SW
radiation, dominated by solar
radiation), but it can give you a pretty good idea of things (fig 1 shows a spectrum of
radiation to space); there is also some comparison to actual
measurements.
Are there any
measurements made by satellites giving a time based record that shows variation in outgoing longwave
radiation dependent on the amount of CO2 in the
atmosphere?
Recent accurate laboratory
measurements of the absorption in the CO2 band by CLOUD (1952) were used to calculate the
radiation flux in the
atmosphere with the aid of the MIDAC high speed digital computor.»
CO2 traps heat According to radiative physics and decades of laboratory
measurements, increased CO2 in the
atmosphere is expected / predicted to absorb more infrared
radiation as it escapes back out to space.
In addition the
measurement is non-trivial, because as Mosh has tirelessly pointed out, the act of spectroscopically measuring thermal
radiation is dependent on a model of the radiative properties of the
atmosphere.
Both
measurements and models show that there is no reduction in IR
radiation out at Top - of -
atmosphere.
Whereabouts are those early 1950s precision
measurements to be found which demonstrate that adding more carbon dioxide really would change how the
atmosphere absorbed
radiation?
The 324W / m ^ 2 of back
radiation is overstated because the wrong emissivity value of the
atmosphere has been used in calculating that back
radiation from
measurements.
Part Six — Visualization — where you can see the model results of downward longwave
radiation in a known temperature / humidity profile through the
atmosphere compared with the actual
measurements of downward longwave
radiation.
But for those who want to see a better experiment that compared real and modeled conditions, take a look at Part Six — Visualization where actual
measurements of humidity and temperature through the
atmosphere were taken, the detailed spectra of downwards longwave
radiation was measured and the model and measured values were compared.
Abstract
Measurements of the flux of downward solar
radiation through the
atmosphere of Venus and at the planetary surface are reported.
The evidence here comes from satellite
measurements of infrared
radiation escaping from the earth into outer space, from
measurements of sunlight reflected from clouds and from
measurements of the temperature the earth's surface or of the troposphere, the roughly 10 km thick layer of the
atmosphere above the earth's surface that is filled with churning air and clouds, heated from below at the earth's surface, and cooled at the top by
radiation into space.
When partnered with cloud remote sensing observations the
radiation measurements and retrievals allow the characterization of cloud and aerosol radiative effects at the surface, which is essential in order to quantify the amount of radiative energy available at the surface to interact with heating the air, evaporating water, and interacting with clouds and greenhouse gasses in the
atmosphere.
After all, according to scientific
measurements the bulk of the
Atmosphere, which is transparent to IR
radiation, is made up from; Nitrogen (78 %), Oxygen (21 %) and Argon (0.9 %) and the rest = 0.1 % is made up from «trace gases» of which some are said to be «GHGs».
The problem is that you think it is a
measurement of a ghostly «downward»
radiation, while the authors of the graph are showing the spectral bands of several constituents of the
atmosphere, not any
measurement of any downward
radiation.
1950s: Research on military applications of radar and infrared
radiation promotes advances in radiative transfer theory and
measurements = >
Radiation math — Studies conducted largely for military applications give accurate values of infrared absorption by gases = > CO2 greenhouse — Nuclear physicists and chemists develop Carbon - 14 analysis, useful for dating ancient climate changes = > Carbon dates, for detecting carbon from fossil fuels in the
atmosphere, and for measuring the rate of ocean turnover = > CO2 greenhouse — Development of digital computers affects many fields including the calculation of
radiation transfer in the
atmosphere = >
Radiation math, and makes it possible to model weather processes = > Models (GCMs)-- Geological studies of polar wandering help provoke Ewing - Donn model of ice ages = > Simple models — Improvements in infrared instrumentation (mainly for industrial processes) allow very precise
measurements of atmospheric CO2 = > CO2 greenhouse.
So, the 729.9 W / m ^ 2 shown during the hours just before and after noon on a dry clear - sky day should be reading somewhat below 729.9 / (1 — 0.313) or less than 1062 W / m ^ 2 by
measurement, near noon, on the equator, for the
atmosphere itself, in those conditions, would not be absorbing as much direct solar
radiation as the average shows in column C either (no clouds).