Not exact matches
Because more charged particles would be created, there also would be more sputtering, another form of
atmospheric loss.
the Arctic has shown a pattern of strong low - level
atmospheric warming over the Arctic Ocean in autumn
because of heat
loss from the ocean back to the atmosphere....
A steady state would eventually be reached wherein CO2
loss balanced CO2 uptake,
because any tendency of plants to absorb more CO2 would reduce
atmospheric concentrations so as to reduce plant growth.
Some regions may even shift from being a carbon sink to being an
atmospheric carbon dioxide source, 50,51,52 though large uncertainties exist, such as whether projected disturbances to forests will be chronic or episodic.31 Midwest forests are more resilient to forest carbon
losses than most western forests
because of relatively high moisture availability, greater nitrogen deposition (which tends to act as a fertilizer), and lower wildfire risk.50, 51,53
I did suggest some time ago to Dr Bob Tisdale across at WUWT that perhaps a difference in the rate of energy
loss during both the warming and cooling phases of ENSO and PDO cycles,
because of a change in the
atmospheric albedo, could provide a physical explanation for the correlation they were describing, but the hypothesis was not favoured.