New measurements of
atmospheric loss by NASA's MAVEN probe should help scientists determine how a planet with rushing water and a temperate climate a few billion years ago transformed into a cold, dry desert.
Not exact matches
The new research, published today in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, explains that this
atmospheric loss is driven
by a polar wind powered
by an interaction between sunlight, the solar magnetic field and the molecules present in the upper atmosphere.
To determine whether declining pollutants deserve credit for the recovery, the researchers used a 3D
atmospheric model to separate the effects of the chemicals from those of weather, which can affect ozone
loss through winds and temperature, and volcanic eruptions, which deplete ozone
by pumping sulfate particles into the upper atmosphere.
Instead it reveals bumps that could indicate a
loss of OH, according to research presented at the AGU conference
by Alexander Turner, a graduate student in
atmospheric chemistry at Harvard University.
«I predict that due to the
loss of these
atmospheric whirlpools, the average temperature on Jupiter will change
by as much as 10 degrees Celsius, getting warmer near the equator and cooler at the poles,» says Marcus.
Scientists are still investigating how this
atmospheric loss occurred, but suggest that the sun might have pushed light molecules out of Mars» upper atmosphere that could not be held in
by the planet's gravity.
Plants can minimize water
loss by closing stomata, but this must be balanced
by the need to take in
atmospheric CO2 for sugar production.
The lag between decreases in sea ice extent during late summer and changes in the mid-latitude
atmospheric circulation during other seasons (like autumn and winter, when the recent
loss of sea ice is much smaller) have been demonstrated empirically, but have not been captured
by existing dynamical models.
«I predict that due to the
loss of these
atmospheric whirlpools, the average temperature on Jupiter will change
by as much as 10 degrees Celsius, getting warmer near the equator and cooler at the poles,» says Marcus.
Right and that fundamental is that a doubling of CO2 will increase
atmospheric resistance to heat
loss by about 3.7 Wm - 2 which could produce 0.8 to 1.5 C of warming depending at the surface or surfaces chosen as references.
By contrast atmospheric temperature amplification is not evident in the Antarctic which is insulated by relatively stable circumpolar winds, persistent sea - ice coverage and the loss of tropospheric ozon
By contrast
atmospheric temperature amplification is not evident in the Antarctic which is insulated
by relatively stable circumpolar winds, persistent sea - ice coverage and the loss of tropospheric ozon
by relatively stable circumpolar winds, persistent sea - ice coverage and the
loss of tropospheric ozone.
Provided that ocean and
atmospheric conditions favor rapid melting in June and July, which we feel are still likely, it is therefore hypothesized that the 2013 fall sea ice extent will achieve values comparable to those of 2012, with regional
losses governed
by local wind and ice conditions and dynamics.
This is not the case in the Arctic where
loss of ice from the Greenland Ice Sheet (GIS) and Canadian Islands is caused
by rising
atmospheric temperature and a warming Arctic ocean.
Thus a change of water vapour, sky radiation and tempcrature is corrected
by a change of cloudiness and
atmospheric circulation, the former increasing the reflection
loss and thus reducing the effective sun heat.
Serious tree
loss and stunted growth caused
by repeated droughts in the Amazon Basin have damaged the rainforest's vital ability to store
atmospheric carbon
Lukovich et al, 4.3, n / a, Heuristic It is hypothesized that the 2012 fall sea ice extent will attain values comparable to those of 2011 based on a heuristic assessment of sea ice and surface
atmospheric dynamics, with regional
losses governed
by local wind and ice conditions.
We analyze spatial patterns of precipitation globally associated with forest
loss by calculating shifts in the global tropical precipitation band, the Inter-Tropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ), associated with changes in cross-equatorial
atmospheric heat transport using equation 2.21 from [33].
If the Ocean slowly cools with radiant heat
loss to space via warmer Arctic waters and a discernible decrease in
atmospheric temps the last 1.5 years since the Super El Nino of 2016, then there should be more
atmospheric CO2 uptake
by cooling oceans.
Until or unless the planetary body is at the same temperature as deep space there will always be energy input at the bottom of the
atmospheric column (and a temperature gradient) and there will always be heat
loss by radiation (or some other means like boiling off of the atmosphere) at the top of the column.
Repeated drought and tree
loss mean that there is increasing risk that the forest may one day cease to be a «sink» for
atmospheric carbon released
by the combustion of fossil fuels.
Worse, every rise in
atmospheric temperature is taken
by AGW «science» to indicate warming, when in many cases, it merely is a sign that additional heat is exposed to the 4 degree Kelvin temperature of outer space, resulting in higher radiative
losses.
Likewise, the 2008 ice
loss was explained as «The shift in location of maximum ice
losses was fueled
by a shift in
atmospheric circulation.
Oxidation
by chlorine (Cl) atoms in the marine
atmospheric boundary layer is suggested as an additional sink for CH4, possibly constituting an additional
loss of about 19 Tg (CH4) yr — 1 (Gupta et al., 1997; Tyler et al., 2000; Platt et al., 2004; Allan et al., 2005).
The Concordia Dome ice core turns out to average about 0.43 cm of ice per year, so the
loss of resolution of
atmospheric CO2
by diffusion averaging is about twice the rate of Vostok.
However, it has long been established that the bulk planetary heat
loss is determined
by atmospheric temperatures far above the surface (Hulburt 1931; North 1975).
Following cessation of emissions, removal of
atmospheric carbon dioxide decreases radiative forcing, but is largely compensated
by slower
loss of heat to the ocean, so that
atmospheric temperatures do not drop significantly for at least 1,000 years.
Also, Baggage Insurance will be of no assistance in case the insured person entrusted their property to a third party; or the lost item has been loaned, hired or entrusted to the insured person; if a person has not reported
loss or theft to the Police within 24 hours of discovery; if
loss or damage has been caused
by delay, wear and tear,
atmospheric conditions, or mechanical derangement.