The radiative and
atmospheric responses also provide insight into how the top of atmosphere net balance of energy responds to perturbations.
Not exact matches
Development of an
atmospheric model that «has emergency
response applications, including tracking mercury deposition and anthrax bioterrorism,» would
also end, it noted.
[
Response: You may
also be interested in the article by Richard Feely and colleagues, Impact of Anthropogenic CO2 on the CaCO3 System in the Oceans arguing that quite apart from any climate impact from
atmospheric CO2, there is a much more direct impact from the dissolution of CO2 in the world's oceans.
We
also note that the modeled
response of
atmospheric pressure to the cooling effect of ice melt is large scale, tending to be of a meridional nature that should be handled by our model resolution.
[
Response: You may
also be interested in the article by Richard Feely and colleagues, Impact of Anthropogenic CO2 on the CaCO3 System in the Oceans arguing that quite apart from any climate impact from
atmospheric CO2, there is a much more direct impact from the dissolution of CO2 in the world's oceans.
Since El Nino
also has an important impact on the Asian Summer Monsoon in particular, its hard to know precisely what large - scale changes in
atmospheric circulation are due to the radiative forcing of the eruption itself, and the secondary
response to that eruption of ENSO.
Also, don't forget the «SO» part of the El Niño / Southern Oscillation (ENSO), which is the all - important
atmospheric response.
In
response to the strengthened western ridge of
atmospheric pressure, the winds of the jet stream usually
also form a deeper, stronger trough downstream.
The temperature did not change, so the surface temperature - dependent
responses of
atmospheric radiative cooling
also did not change.
How hurricanes develop
also depends on how the local atmosphere responds to changes in local sea surface temperatures, and this
atmospheric response depends critically on the cause of the change.23, 24 For example, the atmosphere responds differently when local sea surface temperatures increase due to a local decrease of particulate pollution that allows more sunlight through to warm the ocean, versus when sea surface temperatures increase more uniformly around the world due to increased amounts of human - caused heat - trapping gases.25, 26,27,28
Also, increasing ALL of them will also give the same concentration vs. time response, thus answering the question of «how long will atmospheric CO2 concentrations remain elevated after an input?&ra
Also, increasing ALL of them will
also give the same concentration vs. time response, thus answering the question of «how long will atmospheric CO2 concentrations remain elevated after an input?&ra
also give the same concentration vs. time
response, thus answering the question of «how long will
atmospheric CO2 concentrations remain elevated after an input?»
While «strip - bark» samples should be avoided for temperature reconstructions, attention should
also be paid to the confounding effects of anthropogenic nitrogen deposition (Vitousek et al. 1997), since the nutrient conditions of the soil determine wood growth
response to increased
atmospheric CO2 (Kostiainen et al. 2004).
How hurricanes develop
also depends on how the local atmosphere responds to changes in local sea surface temperatures, and this
atmospheric response depends critically on the cause of the change.23, 24 For example, the atmosphere responds differently when local sea surface temperatures increase due to a local decrease of particulate pollution that allows more sunlight through to warm the ocean, versus when sea surface temperatures increase more uniformly around the world due to increased amounts of human - caused heat - trapping gases.18, 25,26,27 So the link between hurricanes and ocean temperatures is complex.
Based on the understanding of both the physical processes that control key climate feedbacks (see Section 8.6.3), and
also the origin of inter-model differences in the simulation of feedbacks (see Section 8.6.2), the following climate characteristics appear to be particularly important: (i) for the water vapour and lapse rate feedbacks, the
response of upper - tropospheric RH and lapse rate to interannual or decadal changes in climate; (ii) for cloud feedbacks, the
response of boundary - layer clouds and anvil clouds to a change in surface or
atmospheric conditions and the change in cloud radiative properties associated with a change in extratropical synoptic weather systems; (iii) for snow albedo feedbacks, the relationship between surface air temperature and snow melt over northern land areas during spring and (iv) for sea ice feedbacks, the simulation of sea ice thickness.
The atmosphere can not warm / cool more than the ocean SST changes, so it should
also respond more strongly than the
atmospheric response.
The findings
also imply that it is not appropriate to use a single best value of the forcing from doubled
atmospheric CO2 to relate forcing and
response (e.g., climate sensitivity) across a multi-model ensemble.
This is
also of concern for the accuracy of geoengineering modeling studies that assess the
atmospheric response to stratosphere - injected particles.
The upward trend contains the climate
response to enhanced
atmospheric GHG levels but
also a natural component.