For example,
atmospheric studies indicate less CH4 from boreal forests in North America and more from cold, Arctic tundra relative to bottom - up estimates [e.g., Miller et al., 2016].
Not exact matches
«Our results
indicate that
atmospheric escape may play an important role in the evolution of these planets,» summarises Julien de Wit, from MIT, USA, co-author of the
study.
New measurements by NASA's Goddard Institute for Space
Studies indicate that 2012 was the ninth warmest year since 1880, and that the past decade or so has seen some of the warmest years in the last 132 years.One way to illustrate changes in global
atmospheric temperatures is by looking at how far temperatures stray from «normal», or a baseline.
«There is evidence
indicating that the drop in the
atmospheric CO2 growth rate was probably too big to be explained by a reduction in respiration alone,» said the
study's lead author, Lianhong Gu, a researcher at the University of California Berkeley's Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management.
But some
studies indicate that increased
atmospheric CO2 that leads to those higher temperatures could enhance photosynthesis and increase rice yields.
While some
studies indicate methane may already be escaping from the Arctic ground,
atmospheric levels of methane in the Arctic have not increased yet, Dlugokencky said.
Consider the facts: the climate system is
indicated to have left the natural cycle path; multiple lines of evidence and
studies from different fields all point to the human fingerprint on current climate change; the convergence of these evidence lines include ice mass loss, pattern changes, ocean acidification, plant and species migration, isotopic signature of CO2, changes in
atmospheric composition, and many others.
One recent modeling
study indicates that the
atmospheric circulation may respond abruptly to future anthropogenic climate change, at least in a simple climate model.