Furthermore, agreement is widespread that these changes may profoundly affect
atmospheric water vapor concentrations, clouds, precipitation patterns, and runoff and stream flow patterns.
There is no convincing data to support the idea that CO2 level regulates
atmospheric water vapor concentration.
Not exact matches
... The Earth's
atmospheric methane
concentration has increased by about 150 % since 1750, and it accounts for 20 % of the total radiative forcing from all of the long - lived and globally mixed greenhouse gases (these gases don't include
water vapor which is by far the largest component of the greenhouse effect).
This provides a stable reference temperature structure for the fast feedback processes to operate and maintain the amounts of
atmospheric water vapor and clouds at their quasi-equilibrium
concentrations.
The specific humidity (i.e. «
concentration» of
water) is proportional to the ratio of partial pressure of
water vapor to total
atmospheric pressure.
The convective heat / mass transfer due to
water dwarfs any radiative forcing; besides — just on optical depth alone, any re-radiated LWIR from
atmospheric CO2 would be IMMEDIATELY absorbed by the much higher
concentration of
water vapor in the atmosphere (aka clouds!)
«What our study shows is that observed
water vapor concentrations are high enough and temperatures are low enough over the U.S. in summertime to initiate the chemistry that is known to lead to ozone losses,» said Harvard
atmospheric scientist David Wilmouth, one of the paper's co-authors, in an email.
Results of previously published empirical studies are used to demonstrate that the
water vapor feedback mechanism, so important to the calculation of a significant climatic effect for a doubling of the
atmospheric CO2
concentration, appears to be counter-balanced by another feedback mechanism of opposite sign.
The parameterization is intended for application in large - scale
atmospheric and cloud models that can predict 1) the supersaturation of
water vapor, which requires a representation of vertical velocity on the cloud scale, and 2)
concentrations of a variety of insoluble aerosol species.
The rate of heat loss to space is dependent on several factors, including cloudiness and the local
atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide and of
water vapor.
Also, while we have good
atmospheric measurements of other key greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide and methane, we have poor measurements of global
water vapor, so it is not certain by how much
atmospheric concentrations have risen in recent decades or centuries, though satellite measurements, combined with balloon data and some in - situ ground measurements indicate generally positive trends in global
water vapor.»
Water vapor then reacts to this increased absorption, its
concentration in air diminishes, its share of IR absorption goes down, and
atmospheric transmittance is restored to its nominal 15 percent again.
3 Further complicating the response of the different
atmospheric levels to increases in greenhouse gases are other processes such as those associated with changes in the
concentration and distribution of
atmospheric water vapor and clouds.
He deduced that the cooperation of these gases has to take the form of an optimal
atmospheric transmittance window for infrared radiation, such that if the
concentration of one gas, say carbon dioxide, varies and changes
atmospheric transmittance, the other components, such as
water vapor, will have to compensate for it by changing their
concentrations.
For more than 10 years (I forgot how much more), upper tropospheric
water vapor has not increased in response to significant increases in CO2
atmospheric concentrations.
However, because
atmospheric concentrations of
water vapor tend to be at most only a few percent of the amount of air (and usually much lower), they are both often expressed in units of grams of
water vapor per kilogram of (moist or dry) air.
Note that this is only part of the story since, as far as we are aware, no one has yet investigated a counterintuitive parallel effect — condensation and precipitation will likely reduce the total lower
atmospheric concentration of that ubiquitous greenhouse gas,
water vapor, so increasing clear sky radiative cooling.
Since
water vapor is the most important greenhouse gas, the growth in its
concentration caused by
atmospheric warming exerts an additional forcing, causing temperature to rise further.
While it was true that the
atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide had been increasing, he said, and had passed 400 parts per million, the dominant effect of
water vapor had helped flatten the greenhouse effect, such that the rise of global surface temperatures had slowed significantly.