Sentences with phrase «atonement there»

So unless we are covered with the blood atonement there is no remission of our sins.

Not exact matches

«No Country for Old Men» faced some serious competition in the race for best picture («There Will Be Blood,» «Juno,» «Atonement,» «Michael Clayton»), but it still managed to triumph.

There are all sorts of atonement theologies — the one you tell us about is one of the most horrible, in my opinion.

There are many Christian atonement theologies.

Jesus is painted as an atonement by Paul — however — what that atonement actually means is truly up for deeper discussion since in the Torah that sacrifice (of the once a year for the community) was for all people there — for their sins committed in ignorance (or by accident).

Third, there is unlimited atonement, teaching Christ died for all people.

And in the process there was an erosion of Augustinianism that emphasized the soteriological significance either of human will in a form of synergism or of human cooperation with the divine and a growing attack on such classic Protestant doctrines as limited atonement and predestination.

Third, there is limited atonement, the teaching Christ died only for those whom God determined to save.

By saying there is no room for «personal salvation» in your understanding of Jesus» teaching and then claiming that personal salvation gets us to the topic of atonement theory — what was it that you were wanting to say if not making a link between atonement theory and salvation?

Biblical ideas of atonement root back in this basic soil and stem out from it; and while the development later carried them to branches far distant from the roots, there is no understanding the topmost twig — for example, «as in Adam all die, so also in Christ shall all be made alive» --(I Corinthians 15:22.)

There is also an emotional aspect which is the experience of atonement of our inner life of feeling.

-- but there is no doctrine of the Atonement, as yet.

Leviticus 23: 27Also on the tenth day of this seventh month there shall be a day of atonement: it shall be an holy convocation unto you; and ye shall afflict your souls, and offer an offering made by fire unto the LORD.

I read your post (but not the book, yet) on the non-violent atonement, and I am unsure how to understand verses such as «Without the shedding of blood there is no remission» in the light of your «non-violent» concept; it's unclear to me.

But there is an alternative understanding of atonement.

There is no escaping the extreme difficulty that confronts any attempt to frame a doctrine of the Atonement as a result of the growing recognition of the extent to which motives of theological and apologetic construction determine the Gospels as we have them.

Some Christians might believe this, but it is not explicitly taught in Scripture, and there are many other views on how the «atonement» worked and what the death of Jesus accomplished.

The Messiah, Jesus, would be the one who would die for the sins of the world and without that death there would be no atonement.

If it be left for two years it is a deed which nothing can pay, a trespass for which there is not atonement even possible.12

assume that there is only one — to the point, as I have discovered of late, that some people are immensely relieved when they learn that there are other explanations of the cross, and that Anselm's classic expression of the atonement in Cur Deus Homo?

I have been reading with much interest all the posts here concerning Hebrews, and the person who treads underfoot Yahshua and sinning that there is no longer any atonement for doing this.

Same as He became a high priest, perfect and sinless so that He doesn't have to make an atonement for his sins and once again, he is forever alive so that there is no need for another priest.

There is, however, a remarkable fact which appears when we look at the history of the doctrine of atonement.

There have been many other theories of atonement, each picking out what a given generation took to be the worst possible human situation and going on to affirm that in the action of God in Jesus, God met us precisely at that point: slavery to demonic powers, from which we have been delivered; actual slavery to human masters, with manumission accomplished in Christ; guilt for wrongdoing, with Christ as the advocate who pleads for, and secures, our release; corruptibility and mortal death, met in Christ with healing and eternal life....

There is no atonement theory in the story of the prodigal son, but this idea of a father reaching out his arms and running down the road to welcome this wretched young lad — how can you not be moved by that and just say, «Thank you, this is for me»?

There are four affirmations about Jesus Christ that historically have been stressed in Christian faith: (1) Jesus is truly human, bone of our bone and flesh of our flesh, living a human life under the same human conditions any one of us faces — thus Christology, statement of the significance of Jesus, must start «from below,» as many contemporary theologians are insisting; (2) Jesus is that one in whom God energizes in a supreme degree, with a decisive intensity; in traditional language he has been styled «the Incarnate Word of God»; (3) for our sake, to secure human wholeness of life as it moves onward toward fulfillment, Jesus not only lived among us but also was crucified for us — this is the point of talk about atonement wrought in and by him; (4) death was not the end for him, so it is not as if he never existed at all; in some way he triumphed over death, or was given victory over it, so that now and forever he is a reality in the life of God and effective among humankind.

There is less emphasis on substitutionary atonement, with greater openness towards pluralist views of salvation and a liberal view of morality.

For Kierkegaard there is no «solution» to this paradox, other than the greater paradox of the God - man, who, without ever making the leap into sin, became sin for us, i.e., accepted his human solidarity with us, so that in him we might be reconciled with God through the Atonement.

I now believe that there is no atonement theory in Romans and that Paul had a different, and fairly clear, theory of how Jesus saves us.

Jacobsen packs a tremendous amount of theology and age - old questions in there, I particularly benefitted from the discussions about what really happened on the Cross, as it presents an alternative to the oft - memorized penal substituionary (Google doesn't think that is a word apparently...) atonement theories.

For there is no distinction, since all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God; they are now justified by his grace as a gift, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, whom God put forward as a sacrifice of atonement by his blood, effective through faith.

There is also a whole study that could be done tracing the steps of the High Priest on the Day of Atonement, which I think Jesus followed in the «heavenly» temple.

But as I have pointed out in my Gospel Dictionary course, in my book The Atonement of God, and in numerous other places, there are two main types of forgiveness sin the Bible.

There are other important ways in which Mormon teaching does not match biblical teaching on Christ's atonement, but most significantly the Mormon Jesus teaches that membership in the LDS Church is required for eternal life.

And if you have concluded that there are no gods, atonement, resurrections or revelations?

The day following the one - sided vote in Dallas on the «Charter for the Protection of Children and Young People» (there were only thirteen nays), the New York Times expressed satisfaction in an editorial titled «Seeking Atonement in Dallas.»

There are many theological interpretations of the atonement, but Christian sources consistently affirm the centrality of the death of Jesus on the cross.

There is no necessity for human perfection or for blood atonement.

However, if you are brand new to the subject of a nonviolent atonement, a book like this might be just what you are looking for to introduce you to the various views and available authors which are out there in this important topic.

It is there surely that the problem of atonement lies.

Teilhard envisions that the processive realization in history of the atonement actualized in Christ will proceed to a threshold of sudden change, much like the «quantum leap» in which life first emerged on earth, and there will emerge a total humanity newly unified into an «organism» about Christ, the center of centers (PM 288ff.).

There is no longer a temple to go to and sacrifice animals for their blood and receive the atonement.

But one has to have experienced the demolition of the masculine house of self, built on the sands of an achieved righteousness, before there is any possibility in one's own life of the atonement becoming relevant, let alone transforming.

There are many doctrinal differences that most evangelicals seem to be able to live with for the sake of unity, such as women's leadership, penal atonement and the role of the Spirit.

I must not undertake to give you a course in theology, but just to relieve your mind of any suspicion that there is one orthodox doctrine of the atonement, which a Christian is expected to accept, let me give you a sample or two.

Sensible people also recognise that there have been many other grisly days in Ulster's history for which there has been no atonement.

There is very little that compels us about this vision that is chiefly attributed to screenwriter Jason Fuchs (a contributor to Ice Age: Continental Drift) and director Joe Wright, a Brit who comes to this project having primarily made costume dramas like Atonement, 2012's Anna Karenina, and 2005's Pride & Prejudice.

The nominees for best performance by an actor in a motion picture - drama are: George Clooney (Michael Clayton, Daniel Day - Lewis (There Will Be Blood), James McAvoy (Atonement), Denzel Washington (American Gangster), and Viggo Mortensen (Eastern Promises).

The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford — Roger Deakins Atonement — Seamus McGarvey The Diving Bell and the Butterfly — Janusz Kaminski ^ No Country for Old Men — Roger Deakins ^ There Will Be Blood — Robert Elswit

BEST PICTURE — Atonement; Juno; Michael Clayton; No Country for Old Men; There Will Be Blood.