Sentences with phrase «atonement which»

Ian McEwan wrote bestseller Atonement which later became a film starring Saoirse, Keira Knightley and James McAvoy and saw the then 13 - year - old nominated for an Oscar.

The problem is that author Ian McEwan loves having twists in his stories as was the case with Atonement which also starred Saoirse Ronan.

I have always believed in the penal version of the atonement which unfrotunately came out of the reformation (mainly calvin) look at his life and see how many people died in Geneva during his reign....

In the Christian faith it is the atonement which discloses the ultimate resource of God's love.

It has to do with the christus victor theory of the atonement which I find myself moving towards.

The interpretation of the atonement which makes most sense to me is a combination of Abelard's position, of God's exhibiting in act unfailing love for humanity, with what might be styled an ontological grounding, in the very structure and dynamic of the cosmos, for what was done in Christ.

Not until the Christian recognizes the Crucifixion as enacting and embodying the self - negation of the sovereign and transcendent Creator can he celebrate an atonement which is the source of the abolition of all confinement and repression.

Not exact matches

(By the way, we believe in pre-mortal existence where we were born as spirit children, which we also believe in every living thing having a soul two but anyways thats not revelant...) Which was when they were at the «drawing board» of the plan of Earth and everything and how they were going to do everything i.e. who was going to be the savior (because every body needs an atonement so we can go back and repwhich we also believe in every living thing having a soul two but anyways thats not revelant...) Which was when they were at the «drawing board» of the plan of Earth and everything and how they were going to do everything i.e. who was going to be the savior (because every body needs an atonement so we can go back and repWhich was when they were at the «drawing board» of the plan of Earth and everything and how they were going to do everything i.e. who was going to be the savior (because every body needs an atonement so we can go back and repent).

I think Paul is hinting the Spirit of God will lead people into the ideas of God (from the whole Tanakh) and they don't need mind themselves with Jewish rituals (ie: circumcision — then I would also say — for that matter atonement — which is a Torah ritual).

We need to resist sickness and, by faith, submit ourselves to healing, which is from God through the atonement of Christ.

What evangelical would want to be associated with someone who smoked heavily, drank copious quantities of beer, and held views on the Bible, the Atonement, and purgatory which were out of place in the evangelical community of that age?

The founder of Oasis has a track record of making statements which rile many of those who self - identify as evangelicals (see Chalke's past comments on the atonement, the Bible and homosexuality).

Any interpretation which takes universal atonement, and turns it into any form of limited atonement, would be Calvinist.

My book on the Atonement of God begins with a summary of three views on the atonement, and then I define and defend a fourth view, which is a Non-Violent view of the aAtonement of God begins with a summary of three views on the atonement, and then I define and defend a fourth view, which is a Non-Violent view of the aatonement, and then I define and defend a fourth view, which is a Non-Violent view of the atonementatonement.

The book begins with a summary of three views on the atonement, and then I define and defend a fourth view, which is a Non-Violent view of the atonement.

It's not hate towards Joel, it just when you haven't been schooled in religion or teach, atonement, the 10 commandments and doctrine which Jesus taught.

All people, which have continued to sin, despite the knowledge of God's releasing gospel (which is also a gospel of atonement), will get damned for the real sins, which they really committed.

All this, which is only a part of what ought to be said about the Atonement, is not irrelevant to our discussion; for like Professor MacKinnon, though in a rather different way, I want to lay the greatest emphasis on the decisiveness and uniqueness of the Cross and the Resurrection In both these acts of God, however, I find no inconsistency between their decisiveness and «objectivity» and the fact that they are directed towards men: the former as conveying to them the divine acceptance which is also judgement, the latter by bringing to them, in the Easter experiences, the active presence of the living Lord.

Much like Townend's «How Deep the Father's Love for Us», which includes the line «The Father turns His face away», this hymn splits Christians on their view of the atonement.

There is also an emotional aspect which is the experience of atonement of our inner life of feeling.

The recent editorial in Faith on that very subject would have perhaps given him the fuller Catholic vision, which places the Atonement within the perspective of the absolute Primacy of Christ in creation and the solidarity and identity of humanity in his Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity.

There is no escaping the extreme difficulty that confronts any attempt to frame a doctrine of the Atonement as a result of the growing recognition of the extent to which motives of theological and apologetic construction determine the Gospels as we have them.

Cleveland draws from all sorts of sources — from Scot McKnight's A Community Called Atonement, to college football, to multiple scientific studies and surveys, many of which are quite colorful and fascinating.

The word «sacrifice» is almost inexhaustible in its polysemy, particularly in the Old Testament, but the only sacrificial model explicitly invoked in the New Testament is that of the Atonement offering of Israel, which certainly belongs to no cosmic cycle of prudent expenditure and indemnity.

This system provided atonement for sins of which the common folk were often ignorant of committing.

The way in which the meaning of death is woven into the history of sin and reconciliation creates especially difficult problems in the doctrine of atonement.

The theories of the Atonement so far mentioned are all sometimes called «objective», which is to say that Jesus» death on the cross made an objective factual difference to sin and to human beings» relationship to God.

It leads me (some would say, compels me) to believe a string of truths regularly denied in circles which reject or reduce the Scripture principle: the reality of Satan; the existence of angels; the bodily resurrection and sacrificial atonement of Christ; the historical fall into sin; the deity as well as humanity of our Lord; the certainty of his coming again; and the dreadful judgment of the wicked.

This is the atonement sacrifice, which was designed to convince us of the truth.

If it be left for two years it is a deed which nothing can pay, a trespass for which there is not atonement even possible.12

Atonement is that working of love in which the meaning of being human is made plain.

To believe in atonement as the revelation of the love which fulfils and reconciles all human loves is to see all history in a new way.

There is, however, a remarkable fact which appears when we look at the history of the doctrine of atonement.

Anyone who thinks theology is boring should read your new book, «The Atonement of God,» which is without a doubt the best book I have read on the topic.

There have been many other theories of atonement, each picking out what a given generation took to be the worst possible human situation and going on to affirm that in the action of God in Jesus, God met us precisely at that point: slavery to demonic powers, from which we have been delivered; actual slavery to human masters, with manumission accomplished in Christ; guilt for wrongdoing, with Christ as the advocate who pleads for, and secures, our release; corruptibility and mortal death, met in Christ with healing and eternal life....

The doctrine of the Church as the community which bears the meaning of reconciliation in history is not then an addendum to the doctrine of atonement.

For Albrecht Ritschl, Christ saves man by fulfilling his vocation to establish the universal ethical community in which the spirit is victorious over the resistance of nature.2 Thus every theology seeks a pattern in which the atonement can be understood.

Our clue is that if the atonement means God doing what needs to be done to reconcile the world to himself, then the human experiences which may reflect this work of God must be those of personal reconciliation.

Now, blood was the best way for atonement because it required the sinner to play an active role in the sacrificial process by giving up and slaughtering his own animal, however not everyone owned animals which is why God arranged alternate processes to give flour and money as atonement offerings.

Introduction: In Search of a Context «Christologies based on a Europe - centered history, a too narrow or deductive Christ - centered theology, and a church - centered mission tied to classical dogmas about the person of Christ and theories of the atonement, which respond to Western needs, are not only irrelevant to the life of the people but often...

The concept of atonement of sins by beleiving Jesus died for One's sins was developed later to justify the crucifixion which many christians believe it happened.

The three offices may be summed up as revelation, atonement, and kingship, and these in turn may be understood as three mutually related aspects of one work, in which each includes the others.

But Christianity, which is the first discoverer of the paradoxes, is in this case also as paradoxical as possible; it works directly against itself when it establishes sin so securely as a position that it seems a perfect impossibility to do away with it again — and then it is precisely Christianity which, by the atonement, would do away with it so completely that it is as though drowned in the sea.

What is perhaps most frustrating about engaging in such conversations within the evangelical community in particular, however, is that differences regarding things like Calvinism and Arminianism, baptism, heaven and hell, gender roles, homosexuality, and atonement theories often disintegrate into harsh accusations in which we question one another's commitment to Scripture.

We can see that this might make sense to someone brought up in the ancient Jewish tradition in which an unblemished animal was sacrificed to God to make atonement for the sins of the people, and in which the iniquities of Israel were all put on the head of a goat which was then driven out into the wilderness, taking the people's sins with it.

These features differentiate fundamentalists from other evangelical and conservative thinkers who accent the «five smooth stones» by which the Goliath of secular humanism is to be slain: substitutionary atonement, Christ's imminent return, the reality of eternal punishment, the necessity of personal assurance of salvation and the truth of the miracles.

In what has been called the Classic Idea of the atonement, 12 the cross is seen as the last, decisive battle - ground between God and all the spiritual powers of evil, a conflict in which God, through his Son Jesus Christ, won a final and eternal victory against all the evil that threatens and plagues men.

She then referred me to the Antiochian Orthodox statement on the atonement, which also neglects references to Scripture.

«Avenging Angels» — Brigham Youngs murderers — they did his bidding like the Mason Family Mountain Meadows Massacre — the massacre of 30 men 40 women and 70 children in Utah by the «Avenging Angels» see «Blood of the Prophets» by Will Bagley (mormon author) Blood Atonement — the practice of the mormons that atones for the death of its members and / or the act of which the mormons retaliate when they do not believe one is following what they think is right — google the 1984 murder the Lafferty brothers commited in Utah of their sister in - law and her 9 month old daughter by slitting their throats.

There is also a whole study that could be done tracing the steps of the High Priest on the Day of Atonement, which I think Jesus followed in the «heavenly» temple.