Findings support our hypotheses regarding the manner in which brand personality and
attachment style differences systematically influence brand outcomes, including brand attachment, purchase likelihood, and brand choice.
Not exact matches
Instead, they found no
differences at all between the
attachment styles of single and coupled people.
Psychologists who have studied
attachment have found that when human kids have that same kind of licking and grooming -
style bonding with their parents, especially in the first year of life, it gives them all sorts of psychological strength, confidence [and] character that, when they reach school age and even into adulthood, will make a huge
difference in how well they do.»
Author Andrew G. Marshall says that the two main culprits that destroy what he calls «Loving
Attachment» are neglecting physical intimacy and not accepting each other's
differences — such as different parenting
styles or ways of resolving conflicts.
Del Giudice addresses a complex and pertinent theoretical issue: the evolutionary adaptiveness of sex
differences in
attachment styles in relation to life history strategy.
Response to the loss of a romantic relationship:
Differences by time since the loss, gender, and
attachment style.
Also, a comparison of the first and last children showed that a significant
difference existed between the mean of first and last children in avoidant
attachment style (first children were higher than that of last children).
No significant
differences were found among the insecure
attachment styles.
Attachment -
style differences in the experience and expression of romantic jealousy.
Yet just as
attachment styles are associated with different behavior patterns and outcomes in other realms (e.g., Crispi et al. 1997; Hazan and Shaver 1990), they also may be associated with
differences in parent care.
Once the phenomenon had been thoroughly tested and replicated, it became a standard method for testing hypotheses about person perception, communication
differences as a result of gender or cultural
differences, individual
differences in
attachment style, and the effects of maternal depression on infants.
Cross cultural
differences were also found in the distribution of
attachment style among those adolescents with PTSD.
Within a science that stresses the importance of comparing
differences between groups, I am surpised that only one of the
attachment styles was elaborated on, and neither of the others mentioned.
The
difference is just that the narcissistic -
style personality has been able to establish a fragile narcissistic defense against the direct experience of these underlying vulnerabilities, whereas the borderline personality -
style personality has no inner psychological defense against the continual direct experience of these core
attachment beliefs.
Age interacted with
attachment, as dismissive young adults displayed less SML, and gender
differences were revealed in PML among established adults with regard to the preoccupied and fearful
attachment styles.
Adult
attachment style and information processing: individual
differences in curiosity and cognitive closure.
Differences in Unit Cohesion and Combat - Related Mental Health Problems Based on
Attachment Styles in US Military Veterans.
Attachment -
style differences in the ability to suppress negative thoughts: exploring the neural correlates.
Soon our little
differences become annoyances and our predominant
attachment style emerges.
The current review argues that individual
differences in vulnerability to interpersonal stress could (partly) be explained by
differences in relationship orientations or
attachment styles (see also Pines 2004).
Because we value each person's unique learning
style and
differences, we use an eclectic model to approach supervision, drawing on the psychodynamic and
attachment models, cognitive - behavioral model, relational and developmental models.
and early adulthood,
differences in coping
styles were found to be related to
differences in
attachment representations.
Alternatively research could focus more on individual
differences and include single people as well as those in relationships which would be a more effective way to assess the impact of
attachment style.
However both subtypes of the avoidant
style did not report higher levels of cognitive avoidance; the level of cognitive avoidance was even very low in the avoidant - cooperative
attachment group though these
differences have not been significant.
Crying proneness and / or crying frequency have been found to be associated with a number of individual
difference factors, including gender, temperament,
attachment style, socialization, confrontation with stressful / traumatic life events, being engaged in a romantic relationship, and the transition to parenthood (Vingerhoets et al., 2009).
In both adolescence and early adulthood,
differences in coping
styles were found to be related to
differences in
attachment representations.
Attachment -
style differences in the ability to suppress negative thoughts: Exploring the neural correlates.
Given that their sample was recruited from the United Kingdom and ours from the United States, this discrepancy might be explained by
differences in sample characteristics (e.g., ethnicity, relationship status) or cultural
differences in
attachment styles (Del Giudice, 2011; Schmitt et al., 2004).
Individual
differences in adult crying: The role of
attachment styles.
정진미 유현실 et al. «
Differences in Couple Conflict Resolution Strategies among Adult
Attachment Styles and Empathy Levels» Korea Journal of Counseling 14.3 pp. 1535 - 1550 (2013): 1535.
The present study was conceptualized in this context to explore
differences in the Personality factors,
Attachment styles and Coping strategies in couples with good and poor marital quality.
[jounal] Mikulincer, M. / 1999 / The association between adult
attachment style and mental health in extreme life - endangering conditions / Personality and Individual
Differences 27: 831 ~ 842
When we compared TAS - 20 Total scores according to patients»
attachment style, a significant
difference among groups was found (TAS - 20, F = 3.838; p = 0.013).
Through the construction of self - report questionnaires, they found that the three different
styles of
attachment, as proposed by Ainsworth et al. [3], help explain personality
differences in experiences of romantic relationships.
Adult
attachment style and individual
differences in functional versus dysfunctional experiences of anger.
Moreover, to explore
differences in maternal alexithymia and
attachment as function of children / adolescents»
attachment style (secure, ambivalent, avoiding, and disorganized / confused) a series of one - way ANOVAs was carried out.
@article -LCB- ART001781714 -RCB-, author ={ 정진미 and 유현실 -RCB-, title = -LCB-
Differences in Couple Conflict Resolution Strategies among Adult
Attachment Styles and Empathy Levels -RCB-, journal = -LCB- Korea Journal of Counseling -RCB-, issn = -LCB- 1598 - 2068 -RCB-, year = -LCB- 2013 -RCB-, volume = -LCB- 14 -RCB-, number = -LCB- 3 -RCB-, pages = -LCB- 1535 - 1550 -RCB-, doi = -LCB- 10.15703 / kjc.14.3.201306.1535 -RCB-, url = -LCB- http://dx.doi.org/10.15703/kjc.14.3.201306.1535 -RCB-
For example, more specific dispositional tendencies are presumably pertinent as well, such as the chronic individual
difference of believing one is falling short of the ideal standards that a significant other holds for one, in longstanding goals with a significant other (e.g., for affection) that may have chronically gone unsatisfied, and more broadly, individual
differences in chronic depression, or rejection sensitivity, or
attachment style.
Differences in Couple Conflict Resolution Strategies among Adult
Attachment Styles and Empathy Levels Korea Journal of Counseling [Internet].
In sum, gender
differences in close relationships may be present, but since an anxious
attachment style in single males was observed only in a small sample, these results need to be replicated in a larger and more representative sample.
«
Differences in Couple Conflict Resolution Strategies among Adult
Attachment Styles and Empathy Levels» Korea Journal of Counseling 14, no. 3 (2013): 1535 - 1550.
TY - JOUR AU - 정진미 AU - 유현실 TI -
Differences in Couple Conflict Resolution Strategies among Adult
Attachment Styles and Empathy Levels T2 - Korea Journal of Counseling PY - 2013 VL - 14 IS - 3 PB - Korean Counseling Association (KCA) SP - 1535 - 1550 SN - 1598 - 2068 AB - This study investigates how adult attachment styles and empathy levels influence on couples in choosing their conflict resolution s
Attachment Styles and Empathy Levels T2 - Korea Journal of Counseling PY - 2013 VL - 14 IS - 3 PB - Korean Counseling Association (KCA) SP - 1535 - 1550 SN - 1598 - 2068 AB - This study investigates how adult attachment styles and empathy levels influence on couples in choosing their conflict resolution strat
Styles and Empathy Levels T2 - Korea Journal of Counseling PY - 2013 VL - 14 IS - 3 PB - Korean Counseling Association (KCA) SP - 1535 - 1550 SN - 1598 - 2068 AB - This study investigates how adult
attachment styles and empathy levels influence on couples in choosing their conflict resolution s
attachment styles and empathy levels influence on couples in choosing their conflict resolution strat
styles and empathy levels influence on couples in choosing their conflict resolution strategies.
There will be
differences between countries and between different types of institutions and foster care programs, regarding rates of
attachment styles.
There were significant ethnic
differences in «dismissing,» F (2, 247) = 7.84, p <.001; «preoccupied with close relationships,» F (2, 248) = 3.08, p <.04; «secure emotional,» F (2, 250) = 4.24, p <.015; and «comfortable depending,» F (2, 250) = 6.09, p <.003,
attachment styles.
As a whole, these findings support hypotheses 1 and 2 regarding
differences in
attachment styles between children raised in biological families, institutions and foster care.
In agreement with the present findings, previous studies showed similar gender
differences in
attachment style during childhood and similar relationships with family environments (Mikulincer & Florian, 1999; Searle & Meara, 1999).
Research has shown many cross-cultural
differences in proportional ratios of different
attachment styles among children and adults (Sprecher et al., 1994).
As Malaysian culture is part of Asian traditions, which in turn encompasses multiple subcultures, it is expected to demonstrate a few different and unique
attachment styles due to the
differences in child rearing, education, socialization and aspirations towards ideal models of social relationships.
It was difficult to draw conclusions about Hypothesis 4 regarding
differences in
attachment styles between countries and type of institutions / foster care programs.
Findings showed significant ethnic
differences in «dismissing,» «preoccupied with close relationships,» «secure emotional» and «comfortable depending»
attachment styles, perceived stress, family support, and total social support.