Arsenal should not expect it be
attack against defence though, because in the first leg at home the Saints were the better side and created a lot of chances, so we must be ready.
Not exact matches
They should have been ready: when the Times, for instance, ran a piece headlined «critics
attack Pope for his «myopic» views on condoms», their reporters had to fall back on old general statements on condoms, rather than having a vigorous
defence against the latest
attacks, based oncurrent scientific literature, to quote.
«The American episcopate has been strong in its
defence of the liberty of the Church
against the
attacks of the Obama administration, and a healthy majority of our bishops now think of themselves as evangelists as well as administrators.
No attempt to «reconstitute» Q has succeeded in making of it a well - arranged «handbook», although there are signs of a rough general arrangement by subjects, (Cf. T. W. Manson in The Mission and Message of Jesus, pp. 3 f.) and these subjects seem to have included those most vital for Christian evangelism, the Substance of the Christian Life, Principles of Christian Missionary Propaganda,
Defence of the New Religion
against Jewish
Attacks, Expectation of the Judgement.
This is where the immune system — the body's
defence against infection — mistakenly
attacks healthy tissue.
Not being forced into the team or to play on an injury will do the kid good and he is still remarkably good in tight situations and being able to pivot
defence into
attack which is something we sometimes struggle to do
against high press teams.
The home side will be built to counter
attack according to Sam Allardyce, in hope of picking holes in our
defence, and we will have to be wary of their in - form striker Jermaine Defoe, although he does not have a great record
against us.
We'll need pace
against Barcelona, because the NSM combo, despite being sublime in
attack is not very well known for helping in
defence.
we played
against untd B team, their
defence was non existant, made from midfielders,
attack not even need to adress, if you cant win this than you wont win anything, lack leadership ffs you play
against teen players, and you need leadreship hahahahahahaha Wenger is only one to be blamed, if he loved Arsenal he would never let this happened
If they were scared of our forward line they would not venture so much
against us and hence our
defence would not come under sustained
attack.
Brian McDermott will be hoping his
defence can hold out
against the Premier League's most effective
attack as Man United roll into town.
He does a good job in
attack and
defence so for me a full 90 mins
against Norwich for Joel is a no brainier.
Speedy in
attack and sensibly when in
defence, the left sided defender, who can also play at centre back, has taken part in two Premier League matches, coming on as sub
against Wolves and Wigan.
Before the Man United game, most Arsenal fans were regretting that Laurent Koscielny was taken out injured and were worried that Per Mertesacker would have to partner Gabriel in
defence, but they held firm
against the so - called deadly Man United
attack force, and along with Petr Cech (5 shots — 5 saves) stopped the Red Devils from making any sort of comeback.
Wenger said he found a balance between
attack and
defence in yesterdays press conference affter keeping clean sheet
against Sunderland and Burnley?
It turned into a contest between Arsenal pressure
against Southamton
defence and counter
attack.
What a nail - biting afternoon for Arsenal fans as we watched Newcastle defend admirably for over an hour with ten men
against the might of the Gunners
attack force, and the only way that we penetrated their
defence was when we got a lucky own goal from Oxlade - Chamberlain's wayward strike.
Better to stop a good
attacking team and go for a draw or tight win than to try and outscore a team already with soild
defence like we did
against Chelsea and Man City.
In games
against Swansea and Sunderland last season it wan't poor goalkeeping that left us with no bite in
attack and many squandered chances as we continuously shuffle the ball from left to right and back infront of the
defence.
Well our next game is
against Hull City at home and should be mainly about us trying to break down a dogged
defence, so perhaps the
attacking threat of Chamberlain will be a bigger weapon than the passing and work rate of the Egyptian, who might not be in the best frame of mind after losing the AFCON final to Cameroon despite opening the scoring himself.
These teams have good
defences and often play counter
attack football
against us.
who knows whether a disgruntled Sanchez plus an untested lacazette will produce a better
attack than last year and while I have hopes for kolasinac its already clear there will be teething issues with him... but the point is we are not fighting last year's battles we are in this year's EPL
against teams that have strengthened over the summer and it was wingers job to bring real quality to two key areas where we have clearly fallen behind in midfield and central
defence..
The game
against shows Wenger is tactically out of reality.Pool scored from a swift counter
attack with few passes.The gunners in contrast try to out pass amassed
defence and that has been the trouble the last ten years.
First and foremost, in the
attacking department we need someone who'll score
against the most stubborn
defences, even if that player only scores 16 or 17 in 30 - odd matches.
Our
defence cost us because the big teams sent out the calvary
against us, with Giroud alone upfront, there were no consequences for going gung ho on us, u wouldn't go gung ho on Barcelona with Messi and Suarez, U wouldn't do that
against Madrid either even if they sat back because it only takes one break away
attack and ur one goal down already
AITOR KARANKA insists he will not be «parking the bus» at the Emirates this afternoon, and concedes
attack could be the best form of
defence as Middlesbrough look to spring a surprise
against Arsenal.
Being too intent on
attack has cost us dearly in the last two games
against Barcelona and Manchester United and if we push too much and get hit on the break they will defend for their lives, and we have seen how hard it is for us to break down a determined
defence recently.
Well Coquelin cant do it all alone, like the Man city game we need to work together each man covering up for the other Man's mistake, But I feel it would be down to
attacking play, we need to be clinical it has cost us a lot in recent years
against chelsea, remember the 5 - 3 thumping at the bridge, we were clinical on that day, so even if we get caught, if we
attack it would be the best form of
defence, then we end up outscoring them, We need our Attackers to really work hard and really finish any chances created.
So it looks like Monreal at centre back again
against a powerful United
attack, while their
defence is strengthened and our own
attack weakened.
«We have found the balance between
attack and
defence» in a pre match press conference, after only keeping clean sheet
against Sunderland and Burnley.
Ramsay or Wilshire need to sit back or you get the best DM in the world, and pay for everything that brings; pace, ability to read the game, direct AR & JW, protect our
defence, slow down
attacks against us...
Also, I think that he may see him as a big game player, when his pace and counter
attacking threat can be more of use in a tighter game instead of being wasted
against a deep lying
defence.
mick totaly agree with the cdm i was watching the game and thinking how easy it was for leicester to break from there half to our back 4 with little or no resilience we saw the same
against everton stupid wild panicky tackles flying in we definatley need someone who is focused on protecting the
defence and slowing down
attacks while the boys get straight at the back
Its not the
defence that killed us
against Stoke, the defense did well to let in a single goal, where was our
attack?
The Gunners
defence was again exposed
against quality
attacking opposition on Sunday when they lost 2 - 0 to league leaders Chelsea.
Against the run of play a slightly tired
defence allowed an
attack.
i think we're good up front, we only need to coordinate the
defence against Liverpool
attack.
In turn, one of the worst
defences in the top flight is about to be left short of some of their first choice defenders
against a Liverpool side with plenty of
attacking quality, and so it does look concerning from a West Ham perspective.
Into the final quarter and we set our shooters the task of getting to 60 goals and the
defence keeping Edge Hill to under 25 goals, turning over Edge Hills centre and the
defence of Nancy and Bekah yet again getting ball after ball
against a frustrated Edge Hill
attack we went on to dominate the remainder of the game running out comfortable 61 - 23 winners so both «goals» attained.
There would also be times
against stronger / more
attacking sides where perhaps employing the two side by side would be an option to nullify the opposition and heavily protect the
defence from a potent
attacking force (think Barca).
This is especially so
against Chelsea and therefore I think the Gunners will need the extra support from the wing backs in a 343, who can help in
defence and
attack.
So looking at this, we have the best
defence against the best
attack.
I think we have got a very good chance
against Munich, for the simple reason that, like Manchester United, they will come to
attack us themselves to try and win the game, whereas less talented teams tend to sit back and crowd the
defence.
Gibbs started the match
against Sunderland and was impressive both in
defence and
attack.
Antonio Conte's side will have been confident of breaking down our
defence at full - strength, and will be licking their lips with the likes of Eden Hazard, Diego Costa, Willian, Pedro, Michy Batshuayi and Cesc Fabregas available to lead the
attack against us on Saturday.
Previous experience would suggest that the chances of completing not one but two striker deals would be slim but it could serve to reduce the predictability of our
attacking play, particularly
against teams more committed to
defence.
The lack of quality in
attack meant that Manchester United failed to score
against a
defence which had only kept two clean sheets in 2015 prior to the match at Old Trafford.
Henrikh Mkhitaryan's goal
against Tottenham was a great example of how a quick transition of
defence into
attack can create an opportunity for one of their star players to drive towards goal with relative ease.
The Clarets have enjoyed a fine season on home soil in the top flight but their great
defence will naturally be put to the test in this one
against the powerful Liverpool
attack.
The Swans
attack shouldn't be too much trouble for the Pensioners»
defence though — they've kept a clean sheet
against the Welsh side in their last four meetings.