Not surprisingly, Trump's remarks triggered outrage among the media because it amounts to a head - on
attack against the principle of a free press — a fundamental element of the U.S. democratic system.
Not exact matches
Instead of joining in a hue and cry
against a churchman for engaging in this system in which every one of us is implicated, from which even the bishop's salary is derived, or hiding our Christian faces in shame because his hypocritical enemies hold him up as a «horrible example,» the clear call of Christ is that his followers should make a frontal
attack upon the pagan system itself, and demand that our economic order shall give way to an economic order embodying the
principles of the kingdom of God (July 17, 1929).
They include the «chilling effects» of libel suits, the perennial conflicts between property and access, the three out of four publishers who intervene in news decisions affecting their local markets, the advertisers» freedom to move their money to where their interests are, industry self - regulation in broadcasting and advertising, the backlash
against conveying under duress (as in a hostage crisis) points of view that are never aired as directly without duress, the flareups of book banning and censorship of textbooks, the rout of the civil rights movement, the retreat from
principles of fairness and equality (even where never implemented), the
attack on scientific and humane teaching, the threat of self - appointed media watchdogs to also spy on teachers in the classroom, and the general vigor of ancient orthodoxies masquarading as neo-this and neo-that.
These philosophical
principles obviously collide with the worldview of low - intensity - conflict planners for whom nonalignment is a contradiction in terms, and a mixed economy is an
attack against corporate capitalism.
The crisis of the socialist world and the
attacks against this theology have given to the theologians the opportunity to make an evaluation, to asses their own
principles and criteria and to open themselves to the new challenges coming from the changing situation.
Let me add that my biblical vision of the world, in which justice is a central
principle, leads me naturally to condemn and to fight strongly
against the physical and verbal
attacks of which homosexual persons are victims, in the same way that I strongly condemn and fight
against racist and anti-Semitic speeches and deeds.
No attempt to «reconstitute» Q has succeeded in making of it a well - arranged «handbook», although there are signs of a rough general arrangement by subjects, (Cf. T. W. Manson in The Mission and Message of Jesus, pp. 3 f.) and these subjects seem to have included those most vital for Christian evangelism, the Substance of the Christian Life,
Principles of Christian Missionary Propaganda, Defence of the New Religion
against Jewish
Attacks, Expectation of the Judgement.
Therefore, as Yoram Dinstein claims, «even after the endorsement of the
principle of proportionality... the danger of incidental injury to civilians — as a collateral damage resulting from
attacks against military objectives — can not be lightly dismissed.»
The decision not to adopt the commitment «made no sense to me», as it was «plain wrong» in
principle and denied Labour a potentially game - changing line of
attack against David Cameron's Conservatives, he said.
Conservative and libertarian «reformers» love ed reform liberals because they give cover to a project that fits entirely with their
principles but entirely
against those of Matt Yglesias: destroying public institutions, smashing unions, and
attacking liberal Democratic constituencies like public school teachers.
Thus, we consider this case
against the background of a national commitment to the
principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide - open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp
attacks on government and public officials.
That means that - in
principle - you can defend yourself
against an
attack by any means that is necessary to stop it.
As one nominee noted, «her
principled stand
against the
attacks of Harper and his government definitely represent the leadership story of 2014.»
Her specialist areas include creating bespoke wealth preservation structures which include best practice governance
principles and robust defence mechanisms to protect
against family conflict and external
attacks.
After concluding that the cyber «
attacks»
against the nation of Georgia in 2008 did not constitute «armed
attack» under current definitions of the term in the law of war, a report from the NATO Co — operative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence (CCDCOE) concluded that «new approaches to traditional LOAC [law of armed conflict]
principles need to be developed.»