Sentences with phrase «attack on his beliefs»

There will be those christian who will relabel the attack as an attack on their belief and not the people and will use it to force rewrite history.
If you want to address what you see as an attack on your belief by this particular group, I guess the onus it on you to present facts that support the Christmas story not being a myth.
The religious indoctrination in those people is so complete that when they encounter somebody who actually is an Atheist it results in them becoming automatically defensive... as if another person simply believing differently than them is somehow an attack on their beliefs.
(Antony Flew and Alasdair MacIntyre, eds., New Essays in Philosophical Theology [London: SCM Press, 1955], p. 106; see also Antony flew, God and Philosophy [New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1966] for a full - fledged attack on belief in God.)
Someone who continually mistakes anger for hate and thinks an attack on their beliefs means we hate them.

Not exact matches

Many saw it as an aggressive Western attack on femininity and a Russian belief system in which women are encouraged, and expected, to see motherhood as their first priority.
goes through this long exposition of how those who attack ID as a religious theory encroaching on science are simple minded and that ID is somehow more complex than that betrays their own beliefs.
But again each belief is personal and based on lot of factors in our lives and so should not be attacked or ridiculed.
When someone calls that Imam one of the most evil people on the planet, when someone says he wants to build his center to train terrorists, when someone calls for amending the constitution to exclude Islam, when someone says our founding fathers wanted this to be a Christian nation and that they didn't want Muslims included, when Muslims are afraid to go out because they will be attacked, when Christian pastors are preaching against Muslims (as opposed to the belief in Islam), THAT is hatred.
Then Scientists should keep their collective noses out of religion and let the faithful get on with their beliefs without having someone attack them.
If anyone started doing something like this to Mormons, l bet you would never hear the end of complaining, calling it an attack on their freedom of belief & freedom of religion.
«You guys constantly attack Christianity while arguing that we preach our beliefs on to you.
What cracks me up is the religious attack our science... we have their god pushed all the way back to TBB... they seem to lose track of the fact that their beliefs are based on, at minimum 1350 year old thinking (quaran) and somehow ancient philosophy can trump The Big Bang and the solid science that its based on.
Different belief is why the christians send missionaries... to attack others beliefs, same reason the Mormons and Jehovah Wtnesses knock on your door.
There seems to be more attacks on Christians beliefs now more than ever.
So don't take my comment as an attack on y our beliefs, or as an assumption about what you believe.
Either you respect ALL parts of her take on Christianity or you are attacking the whole of her beliefs.
So a challenge to our beliefs may in fact be very much in support of God, not an attack on God.
However, this is no personal attack on you or anyone who holds such beliefs.
The post is so full of historical inaccuracies, theological problems, and contradictions that it's hard to know where to start, but I want to make clear from the get - go that my response to this post should not be seen as an attack on Tim Challies himself, (who I respect and like), but rather a response to the general belief that God's presence is limited to the pages of Scripture and that all forms of contemplative or experiential spirituality should therefore be dismissed out of hand or regarded with suspicion.
I do feel I need to reach out to the ones who hold my belief or non belief LOL in God to simply realize that religion is not going anywhere and an attack on the religious only appears pathetic.
I don't impose my Christian beliefs on anyone but have consistently been attacked by atheists dozens of times over my life.
@Truth and Facts There are no trues in the Atheist billboard, merely an attack on Christian beliefs.
@Chuckles The belief remark was made to silence those who would «attack» me on whether or not I'm an atheist or Christian.
Islam was driven into expansions outer boarder came after the death of the Messenger of God and only went to outer the Arabian Penisular towards the Arabic countries boarders now because of the wars launched on their boarders by the Roman Empire before changing face when a new Religion was imposed that combined all Beliefs that was within it into one state religion based on which The Roman Armies became to be known there after as the Crusaders whom launched attacks by land or by sea on Islamic countries through many generations up to date
As opposed to the thousands and thousands of billboards & church message boards every 50 ft with their snarky comments pushing their beliefs and quite often attacking non -(Jesus) believers and / or science directly or indirectly, all the millions of people that like to go around constantly «sharing their beliefs» about how everyone who believes differently is gonna be tortured and burned for eternity, or the countless attempts by local, state, and federal government officials to push laws based on those beliefs and to favor those beliefs all over the country.
On all sides the Church, creeds, and beliefs were under serious attack during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.
All these politicians attacking a resturant owner for his on personal belief are they for real?
As such, if the religious want it let them put it in one of their churches but DO NOT display it as an object of spiritual significance on government land using public funds in a memorial to commemorate a disastrous attack that affected the lives many, many people who do not share your beliefs in Christ and crosses.
Karl Barth famously attacked apologetics — the attempt to offer a persuasive account of Christian belief on mutually agreed - upon grounds of reason — as a misguided task, part of the failure of theological liberalism.
They say that religious people are intolerant of other beliefs and that may be so to a point, on the other hand atheists commit the same «sin» when they attack people who freely choose to believe in something different.
Next, you don't see a bunch of people on here telling you what to believe, so why do you feel you have the right to insult and attack someone elses beliefs?
People took issue with Pratt's belief on Twitter, with plenty of Twitter users jumping in to prayersplain how heart attacks work, and doctors, and prayer isn't real and yada, yada.
I am still looking for any indications that atheists, on behalf of their lack of belief in any gods, have attacked or burned mosques or churches or synagogs.
If you have abundant personal evidence then this shouldn't offend you; this attacks the belief of god that is based merely on scripture, not a belief gained through personal experience
They seem to think that any attempt to stop them from forcing their beliefs on us is some kind of attack on their religious freedoms.
I posted one of the Christian «attacks» on Warren on a previous CNN Belief Blog entry, arguing that Warren's teachings were obviously no cure for his son's depression, and that Warren should consider this experience as a lesson that his views are shallow and dangerous, and that the size and wealth of his church is not a sign of God's blessing.
Theology in this context may not be the most precisely accurate term but it being slightly inaccurate does not turn his remark into an attack on the sincerity of Obama's religious beliefs.
This is not attack on your religious or conservative beliefs, this is merely informing you that it is 2013, time to set your clocks to current time and realize the world has changed since the precious Reagan years and it's not going back to that time..
@ > Mr.N... I'm not hung up on attacking, but I DO have my reservations about those with irrational beliefs.
So as I have said to others on this blog... before lashing out with accusations and attacks, at least seek to learn something about the actual views and beliefs of the person you intend to attack.
Questioning the nonsensical belief in fairy tales based on an ancient tribal myths, and encouraging the «believer» to employ reason and rationally evaluate his or her position, isn't an attack.
Are you so naive as to believe that this is not an attack on Christian beliefs, rather than promoting atheism (which I again still find it ridiculous to promote something as «non-belief»)?
You are just angry because you feel that presenting children with multiple choices of belief attacks your monopoly on faith that Christians have enjoyed in the country for centuries.
It would seem that the attacks on the Mormon church for their beliefs is pretty childish on the gay communities part.
Like so many of his fellow fashionable atheists he bases his attack on Christianity on a very partial understanding of Christian belief.
More commonly and subtly, a mental disorder may so distort an individual's beliefs that he may think he is doing right when in fact an act is terribly wrong - as, for example, when a person has the delusion that his wife has literally turned into a zombie and that shooting her is the only way to protect himself from being eaten alive, or an inpatient attacks the attendants on his ward when they come to take him to an appointment because he believes they are alien beings sent to kill him.
In the face of attrition and growing public ambivalence, too many Christians lazily lean back on attack language and war rhetoric, especially with those deemed outsiders (i.e. non-Christians or Christians who don't fit within a narrow framework of appearance, conduct and belief system).
You sir are an idiot, i will continue to believe so, But at the same time, i will make note, that i did not come on here to point out how flawed your beliefs are, it only lead down that road because you took it there, i was pointing out, that it does none of us good to sit here and disagree and try to disprove one another's beliefs, you have your own i have mine, i know something to be true, and you somehow believe what you believe, i'm apparently not going to change your mind and you have no shot at disproving my beliefs so why attack eachothers beliefs?
Out of an attack on language and its meanings, probably in adolescence, belief in God may begin to emerge as one s own belief.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z