There will be those christian who will relabel the attack as
an attack on their belief and not the people and will use it to force rewrite history.
If you want to address what you see as
an attack on your belief by this particular group, I guess the onus it on you to present facts that support the Christmas story not being a myth.
The religious indoctrination in those people is so complete that when they encounter somebody who actually is an Atheist it results in them becoming automatically defensive... as if another person simply believing differently than them is somehow
an attack on their beliefs.
(Antony Flew and Alasdair MacIntyre, eds., New Essays in Philosophical Theology [London: SCM Press, 1955], p. 106; see also Antony flew, God and Philosophy [New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1966] for a full - fledged
attack on belief in God.)
Someone who continually mistakes anger for hate and thinks
an attack on their beliefs means we hate them.
Not exact matches
Many saw it as an aggressive Western
attack on femininity and a Russian
belief system in which women are encouraged, and expected, to see motherhood as their first priority.
goes through this long exposition of how those who
attack ID as a religious theory encroaching
on science are simple minded and that ID is somehow more complex than that betrays their own
beliefs.
But again each
belief is personal and based
on lot of factors in our lives and so should not be
attacked or ridiculed.
When someone calls that Imam one of the most evil people
on the planet, when someone says he wants to build his center to train terrorists, when someone calls for amending the constitution to exclude Islam, when someone says our founding fathers wanted this to be a Christian nation and that they didn't want Muslims included, when Muslims are afraid to go out because they will be
attacked, when Christian pastors are preaching against Muslims (as opposed to the
belief in Islam), THAT is hatred.
Then Scientists should keep their collective noses out of religion and let the faithful get
on with their
beliefs without having someone
attack them.
If anyone started doing something like this to Mormons, l bet you would never hear the end of complaining, calling it an
attack on their freedom of
belief & freedom of religion.
«You guys constantly
attack Christianity while arguing that we preach our
beliefs on to you.
What cracks me up is the religious
attack our science... we have their god pushed all the way back to TBB... they seem to lose track of the fact that their
beliefs are based
on, at minimum 1350 year old thinking (quaran) and somehow ancient philosophy can trump The Big Bang and the solid science that its based
on.
Different
belief is why the christians send missionaries... to
attack others
beliefs, same reason the Mormons and Jehovah Wtnesses knock
on your door.
There seems to be more
attacks on Christians
beliefs now more than ever.
So don't take my comment as an
attack on y our
beliefs, or as an assumption about what you believe.
Either you respect ALL parts of her take
on Christianity or you are
attacking the whole of her
beliefs.
So a challenge to our
beliefs may in fact be very much in support of God, not an
attack on God.
However, this is no personal
attack on you or anyone who holds such
beliefs.
The post is so full of historical inaccuracies, theological problems, and contradictions that it's hard to know where to start, but I want to make clear from the get - go that my response to this post should not be seen as an
attack on Tim Challies himself, (who I respect and like), but rather a response to the general
belief that God's presence is limited to the pages of Scripture and that all forms of contemplative or experiential spirituality should therefore be dismissed out of hand or regarded with suspicion.
I do feel I need to reach out to the ones who hold my
belief or non
belief LOL in God to simply realize that religion is not going anywhere and an
attack on the religious only appears pathetic.
I don't impose my Christian
beliefs on anyone but have consistently been
attacked by atheists dozens of times over my life.
@Truth and Facts There are no trues in the Atheist billboard, merely an
attack on Christian
beliefs.
@Chuckles The
belief remark was made to silence those who would «
attack» me
on whether or not I'm an atheist or Christian.
Islam was driven into expansions outer boarder came after the death of the Messenger of God and only went to outer the Arabian Penisular towards the Arabic countries boarders now because of the wars launched
on their boarders by the Roman Empire before changing face when a new Religion was imposed that combined all
Beliefs that was within it into one state religion based
on which The Roman Armies became to be known there after as the Crusaders whom launched
attacks by land or by sea
on Islamic countries through many generations up to date
As opposed to the thousands and thousands of billboards & church message boards every 50 ft with their snarky comments pushing their
beliefs and quite often
attacking non -(Jesus) believers and / or science directly or indirectly, all the millions of people that like to go around constantly «sharing their
beliefs» about how everyone who believes differently is gonna be tortured and burned for eternity, or the countless attempts by local, state, and federal government officials to push laws based
on those
beliefs and to favor those
beliefs all over the country.
On all sides the Church, creeds, and
beliefs were under serious
attack during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.
All these politicians
attacking a resturant owner for his
on personal
belief are they for real?
As such, if the religious want it let them put it in one of their churches but DO NOT display it as an object of spiritual significance
on government land using public funds in a memorial to commemorate a disastrous
attack that affected the lives many, many people who do not share your
beliefs in Christ and crosses.
Karl Barth famously
attacked apologetics — the attempt to offer a persuasive account of Christian
belief on mutually agreed - upon grounds of reason — as a misguided task, part of the failure of theological liberalism.
They say that religious people are intolerant of other
beliefs and that may be so to a point,
on the other hand atheists commit the same «sin» when they
attack people who freely choose to believe in something different.
Next, you don't see a bunch of people
on here telling you what to believe, so why do you feel you have the right to insult and
attack someone elses
beliefs?
People took issue with Pratt's
belief on Twitter, with plenty of Twitter users jumping in to prayersplain how heart
attacks work, and doctors, and prayer isn't real and yada, yada.
I am still looking for any indications that atheists,
on behalf of their lack of
belief in any gods, have
attacked or burned mosques or churches or synagogs.
If you have abundant personal evidence then this shouldn't offend you; this
attacks the
belief of god that is based merely
on scripture, not a
belief gained through personal experience
They seem to think that any attempt to stop them from forcing their
beliefs on us is some kind of
attack on their religious freedoms.
I posted one of the Christian «
attacks»
on Warren
on a previous CNN
Belief Blog entry, arguing that Warren's teachings were obviously no cure for his son's depression, and that Warren should consider this experience as a lesson that his views are shallow and dangerous, and that the size and wealth of his church is not a sign of God's blessing.
Theology in this context may not be the most precisely accurate term but it being slightly inaccurate does not turn his remark into an
attack on the sincerity of Obama's religious
beliefs.
This is not
attack on your religious or conservative
beliefs, this is merely informing you that it is 2013, time to set your clocks to current time and realize the world has changed since the precious Reagan years and it's not going back to that time..
@ > Mr.N... I'm not hung up
on attacking, but I DO have my reservations about those with irrational
beliefs.
So as I have said to others
on this blog... before lashing out with accusations and
attacks, at least seek to learn something about the actual views and
beliefs of the person you intend to
attack.
Questioning the nonsensical
belief in fairy tales based
on an ancient tribal myths, and encouraging the «believer» to employ reason and rationally evaluate his or her position, isn't an
attack.
Are you so naive as to believe that this is not an
attack on Christian
beliefs, rather than promoting atheism (which I again still find it ridiculous to promote something as «non-belief»)?
You are just angry because you feel that presenting children with multiple choices of
belief attacks your monopoly
on faith that Christians have enjoyed in the country for centuries.
It would seem that the
attacks on the Mormon church for their
beliefs is pretty childish
on the gay communities part.
Like so many of his fellow fashionable atheists he bases his
attack on Christianity
on a very partial understanding of Christian
belief.
More commonly and subtly, a mental disorder may so distort an individual's
beliefs that he may think he is doing right when in fact an act is terribly wrong - as, for example, when a person has the delusion that his wife has literally turned into a zombie and that shooting her is the only way to protect himself from being eaten alive, or an inpatient
attacks the attendants
on his ward when they come to take him to an appointment because he believes they are alien beings sent to kill him.
In the face of attrition and growing public ambivalence, too many Christians lazily lean back
on attack language and war rhetoric, especially with those deemed outsiders (i.e. non-Christians or Christians who don't fit within a narrow framework of appearance, conduct and
belief system).
You sir are an idiot, i will continue to believe so, But at the same time, i will make note, that i did not come
on here to point out how flawed your
beliefs are, it only lead down that road because you took it there, i was pointing out, that it does none of us good to sit here and disagree and try to disprove one another's
beliefs, you have your own i have mine, i know something to be true, and you somehow believe what you believe, i'm apparently not going to change your mind and you have no shot at disproving my
beliefs so why
attack eachothers
beliefs?
Out of an
attack on language and its meanings, probably in adolescence,
belief in God may begin to emerge as one s own
belief.