Sentences with phrase «attack running into»

I suggested earlier (after the two barren draws) we should attack running into the box (striker inclusive) and look how many goals we have scored since using this tactic.

Hernandez rarely, if ever, makes attacking runs into the box - he is happy just outside the 18 yards trying to play the ball through.

As Sakho has come tight to Bony he's left space in behind him for Shelvey to make an attacking run into.

Not exact matches

«I wanted the pilot who's going to fly that very sensitive reconnaissance mission during the attack to run into the operators who had been on the mission,» he said.

This probably brings to your mind the scene of a heart attack, woman going into labor, or a run - of - the - mill slip or fall.

Technical attacks can spread through corporate networks like wildfire, so going temporarily into «lock down» is usually a more sensible strategy than trying to keep everything running.

That even in the aftermath of serious attacks on the homeland, reasonable American willingness to project power abroad would not be fairly criticized when it inevitably made errors and ran into difficulties, but rather be met with a deliberately - stirred anti-war hysteria of breathtaking rhetorical viciousness.

Elneny has run hot and cold and is maybe more attacking than Xhaka, but after an undisciplined start to his Arsenal career, Xhaka seems to have grown into the role and has been even more influential since the Gunners changed formation.

When a player is running down the wing on the break and you're an attacking player, you bust your gut to get into the box.

For example, against Pullis type teams we may want Ramsey who will make the penetrating late runs into the box against a team that sits back and defends, we may want to start with Ramsey against a team like Chelsea to get the 1st goal but then Coquelin coming on to sit and defend while relying on long passes from Xhaka and the threat from our tank Seo and Bellerin / Ox... More counter attacking.

if i am correct @ SD... your analysis shows you see the forest for the trees, most comments just give their opinion like they are playing Championship manager - as JT said coquelin has helped slightly fix the problem of the overexposure of our defence to counter attacks and the full backs don't both bomb forward as much, the reason monreal starts ahead of Gibbs - walcott always looks lost and confused now when he makes appearances, and never wants to create or get too involved in build up play just wants to run into the middle and get on the end of balls.

However, against the run of play, All Saints went on a great counter attack and shot at the goal, which the Eton Messi goalkeeper managed to save but failed to keep hold of the ball which All Saints player, Luca Raimo managed to tap into the back of the net.

There was the reliable Winterburn and Dixon marauding but well timed overload runs into attack and defense.

Ramsey has an engine room quite like that which Vieira had, so an arrangement for a super attacking front will not inhibit Ramsey from getting the goals as he still will make these runs, but they will be less frequent as he would need to concentrate more in stopping attacks by the opponent and transforming the defense into counter attacks.

He launches an attack for Arsenal, he sees Welbeck making a run, he kicks the ball, the ball lands at Welbeck's feet, he notices Sanchez making a run, he passes the ball to Sanchez, Sanchez does his dribbling drills, two defenders are out, he had an option to either go for goal or pass the ball to an on - rushing Xhaka, he chose to lay the ball for Xhaka, who then fires an unstoppable shot into the net for our third goal!.

It allows Ramsey a position in the center of the field in the areas where his best runs into attack can be very useful.

It's the old greedy bolloxs tactic which deliberately stops your team mate from attacking the opponents goal while it gives you the chance to run into the box and gain the glory when the cross comes in... i hope that made some sense???

It's the best way to give the passing attack a spread dimension that can be flipped into quality running plays.

Miami's running attack will be sound with veterans John Acuff and Joe Mira at halfback, and Fullback Doug McGee, whose specialty is knocking himself out ramming into an opponent's end zone.

@jt Yes «strengthen the spine» My kingdom for a beast of a DM a 25 goal a season striker Hit the decks a running and spin those guns around Give 110 %, work your socks off, snuff out attacks, be clinical in front of goal kill the game off, go to the next level, instigate attacks, create opportunities, turn water into wine, straw into gold, all with a generous dollop of mental strength But «jt» we are just casting pearls... pushing water uphill with a rake «The spine the spine where 4 art thou»

Haven't you noticed how 9 times out of 10 he passes the ball behind his team mate, when in an attacking position, just so that he can run into the box to receive the ball back again, He rarely gives a forward pass in that situation, his too selfish and greedy!

To be honest I would allow sanchez and ozil to roam freely in attack, in other words sanchez could come wide in some attacks, make runs through the middle in others etc, and the same with ozil, can come out wide to collect the ball or roam into the middle to feed sanchez and walcott through balls to run on to... In the attacking sense it does nt really matter to me, they both are good in different aspects so they could be used for different roles against different opponents.

Made a few rash passes in the first half but was solid in the second, running into space created by tired opposition legs to hasten attacks.

Ramsay in my view is an attacking MF who can make runs into the box and nick goals but lacks discipline in a central midfield pairing and unless we lose a winger or cm (or perhaps Ozil) is better benched and used as a sub.

Running mad in Urban Meyer's radical spread - option attack, Utah is stalking an unbeaten season — and putting another scare into the powers behind the BCS

I will hear that Walcott is not defensive enough and all that, but not many players were before, now when the team is attacking and defending like a unit, then Walcott will also get into the rythm, He has just come from an injury, he might not have been lethal enough but he is still good as a winger, he can make runs behind defenses, he is a good crosser, he can test the keeper...

Our attack is more lethal without him running into 4 players only to lose the ball.

On the high pick - and - roll, they moved the point of attack away from the imaginary line running down the middle of the floor to a few feet into the slot, which is the 8 - foot section of the floor between the wing and the middle of the floor.

In the seasons following his statistically excellent season, many attacks or opportunities have broken down because of Ramsey taking ill - advised shots, or making runs into the box to get on the end of an attack when it was better suited for someone else to do so and for him to just hold shape.

Hiring Gailey to run the offense was an obvious attempt to put life into an attack that scored fewer points in each of Johnson's last two years than it had in any of the previous nine.

That was the case right up until an almost miraculous block of a Gareth Bale shot during a terrifying sequence of Real attacking nearly found the back of the net, finally letting Atlético launch forward on the counter — and Juanfran found Carrasco running for the far post, drilling a low cross to the Belgian that got emphatically fired home to level the scoreline and send Atlético fans all over the world into rapturous joy.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

I still don't understand people's obsession with boxing players in to a specific role... The whole «true DM» is a dying breed, even Coquelin is arguably something else considering the advanced positions he takes up often in front of Santi and takes major risks in winning the ball back for us... IMO, the reason Coquelin has had such a successful integration into the first team is that he focussed incredibly hard on the basics of his role first and foremost before adding other elements to his game (long - balls, driving runs into space, more aggressive ball movement in general) it's not rocket science to tell a player to curb the attacking side of their game and focus primarily on defence before attack... Nor is it that hard to see that playing in a midfield pairing with either Ramsey or Cazorla is going to be different as well.

Laca has tidy feet and can wriggle out of tight pos better than he can get past a man running with the ball at his feet while not losing the potency of attack, Laca will make a good pass instead which is what a hold up CF would be doing to bring in the wide forwards into play.

We need an early goal, to make utd play into our hands, Otherwise they will just sit back and counter attack us and score against the run of play..

If it was jack or Ramsey they would want to run with ball then lose it in dangerous positions resulting into counter attack.

The Vikings have the best defense not facing Tom Brady this weekend, and the Eagles could well try to turn this into a run - heavy attack.

Hit on the counter with our full backs behind play and acres of space to run into means they are dictating play (our defenders have all this space to defend whilst the attack have this space to run into, it works better for the attacker).

One: Since the loss of Mark Walton, the rushing attack has suffered a bit, and someone who can really defend the run could turn Miami into a one - sided attack.

No matter how you slice it, you can't run an uptempo offence with Giroud on the pitch and that means sideways soccer and an over-reliance on crosses into the box, thereby negating many of the very reasons Lacazette was on your radar in the first place... we simply aren't clinical enough from wide positions to continue with that approach, which is why many fans have been clamoring for a viable alternative to Giroud for several years... once again this isn't an attack on Giroud, he clearly has some tangible skills, but his mere presence on the pitch greatly impacts your tactical options... Giroud's weaknesses are simply highlighted by the way in which our offence now moves in a more horizontal than vertical manner, which allows most teams ample time to regroup defensively before a scoring opportunity even arises... a player of Ibra's or Benzema's ilk would have been far more effective as they had size, speed and the first touch capabilities required to for intricate link - up play... once again square peg in a round hole

I assume Wenger will go with his predictable «Plan A» (attack: 4 -2-3-1), but this will be fairly muted due to lack of confidence and players not seeming to work hard and intelligently run into space as well as run to create space (all the «top» teams do this).

He runs deep into the opposition box to attack.

Giroud will be eased out of the team just like Mert... IF we buy Morata, or Icardi, Giroud will lead the attack for like 5 - 10 games into the season if he is in good form... then the new striker will start with cameos... Giroud for his price alone is more than enough back up for us, and then his hardwork... if we sell him just like that we will be back to square one, depending on the new striker to quickly hit the ground running may or may not work!

The rangy French international has the ability to spring midfield into attack with strong runs into enemy territory in a manner not unlike a certain Patrick Vieira.

The Arsenal boss spoke about how adding the attacking runs to Ozil's already prodigious talents has made him into an amazing player.

[in fairness, walcott does run fast some times, he runs so fast he ends up offside and kills our attack; other times he runs straight ahead into players like the burnley goalie]

1) refs are shite as usual 2) Chambers» inexperience, Mertesacker's lack of match fitness and the lack of familiarity showed today for both goals 3) Sanchez makes good runs, but nobody plays him through 4) Play Ozil in the center 5) team showed they still have more fight in them than last season and actually closed down better 6) Why is Ramsey the only one to make a run into the box and attack the ball?

Whilst against Liverpool, we knew that they would leave spaces to run into, yet didn't play a more fluid attacking front line.

Into the final quarter and we set our shooters the task of getting to 60 goals and the defence keeping Edge Hill to under 25 goals, turning over Edge Hills centre and the defence of Nancy and Bekah yet again getting ball after ball against a frustrated Edge Hill attack we went on to dominate the remainder of the game running out comfortable 61 - 23 winners so both «goals» attained.

What we got was things going off the rails from the start — Cena hit his finisher on four opponents before Styles decided against running right into one, and then it was signature moves and finishers and false finishes due to interference and brutal attacks on the outside and broken announce tables and stairs getting thrown and Corbin did throw someone into the crowd, but alas, did not then use a fan as a weapon.