Sentences with phrase «attack upon science»

I hope he will be good - humored enough to realize that such a chapter as I have just written is not meant to be an attack upon science but an attack upon that one - sided obsession with the material and the tangible which leads to the loss of spiritual apprehension.

Not exact matches

Attacking Christianity We can say of many of the secondary lines of attack upon Christian dogma drawn from the modern sciences and modern critique that the interpretations offered of the evidence is never necessary, and that frequently the evidence itself is too scrappy and too little evaluated as fact to be worth considering.

This approach has, in some circles, been condemned as an attack upon the status and fund worthiness of science.

One of the major attacks on climate science has been the denigration of models, now in less than two weeks two very public model predictions based upon science have proven spectacularly true.

A version of the «bad» science argument that has frequently been deployed by the climate change disinformation campaign are attacks on climate impacts predictions based upon climate models.

This is what climate change skepticism has become; an attack upon the idea of redressing climate change, by strong self reinforcing self convincing, that the science reality itself doesn't pose a huge threat to the stability and moderate - ness of our climate; and there are sites and outlays of information and rhetoric everywhere that feed on this and make it seem more and more legitimate and increasingly self fulfilling.

So what, aside from the constant process of attack, denigration, conflating the process of science itself as well as uncertainty with refutation of the basic theory of Climate Change itself, and constantly picking out of context incomplete pieces of corroboration and misrepresenting them as some sort of referendum on climate change, is that theory that it wouldn't, or at least the presumption that it wouldn't, based upon?

Jai Mitchell, in a characteristically nasty comment that ignores the ancient logical principle that attacks upon the man rather than his argument are illogical and, therefore, unscientific, imagines (incorrectly) that I. like him, have no background in science.

The «Father of the University of Virginia» and fan of enlightenment might have frowned upon seeing his name usurped to perpetuate attacks on climate science.

'' and fan of enlightenment might have frowned upon seeing his name usurped to perpetuate attacks on climate science.

There's not a word in the docs from Heartland that show anything other than a desire to use their puny budget to most effectively present real science to counter this profoundly stupid attack on the molecule upon which all life is built.