Was Ravitch the darling of the Right during the 1980s and 1990s when
she attacked multiculturalism and progressive education because she fairly and exhaustively described the historical record or because she just drew conclusions that the Right preferred?
Not exact matches
The 1,500 - page manifesto that has been attributed to him draws on contemporary European and American conservatism in its
attacks on Marxism,
multiculturalism, secularism, academia and feminism.
Nor was
multiculturalism the only long - standing Labour Party dogma that Kelly
attacked.
Multiculturalism gets
attacked a lot from the right in the US and I'm afraid that that can inspire a sort of lazy minded «the enemy of my enemy is my friend» response in some consider themselves left or at least anti-right.
The political
attack on
multiculturalism isn't just inaccurate and unethical — it is a self - inflicted political handicap.
Does teaching
multiculturalism imply that our failure to understand other cultures was partly responsible for the terrorist
attacks?
We are used to
attacks on
multiculturalism (now so solidly established in social studies in elementary and high schools) from the right, from conservatives who are alarmed at a diminution of loyalty to the nation as other loyalties are promoted.