possibly Lemar as he always buys
attackers than defenders... however if Sanchez stays i would prefer a proper CDM and let the wing backs run wild!
Not exact matches
Ox is much better
attacker and
defender than him....
also: like another commenter, i also wonder if roz would be better
than flam at DM [i know its a waste to put him there, but what can u do when ur manager has twice as many
attackers as
defenders in the squad?]
And it's normal for
defenders to have a better acceleration
than attackers!
Other
than that, props to him for bringing on more
defenders and NOT
attackers yesterday.
I'd think that
attackers, especially forwards, would have a lower successful passing rate
than defenders.
Defending in today's game is much different, fullbacks are
attackers at AFC, and others, more often
than defenders.
it seems like wenger simply decided that he should take off a
defender for an
attacker with no real live context except a theory that suggests a striker would more likely score a goal
than a
defender.
The German, though a good
defender, simply can not keep up with the faster
attackers in the League and that has resulted in us conceding more
than once this season.
Some use equations in which the exponents are much smaller
than called for in the square law and in which there are some differences in exponent between
attacker and
defender (e.g., to reflect the different mix of aimed and unaimed fire that might result from the
defender having better cover and the
attacker relying more heavily on artillery preparation).
If the
attacker's result was higher
than add two to the 2D6 result, and it was double the amount of successes that the
defender got then add four.
The active
defender is less likely
than the original
attacker to copy or re-use intellectual property, where the mere copying gives rise to damages, both statutory and special.