Sentences with phrase «attacking runs meant»

Flashed the ball across the face of goal 74 minutes in but the lack of attacking runs meant that his efforts were not rewarded.

Not exact matches

I imagine it was because Wenger decided to attack the weaker Spurs defender, but it meant that Danny Rose could take it passed Campbell on the outside more easily asit was his weaker side and run at a rusty Debuchy.

Occasional runs through the middle don't mean he's an attacking midfielder.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

With Giroud, i meant as a holding player at part of the counter attack and the faster players running off him.

Hit on the counter with our full backs behind play and acres of space to run into means they are dictating play (our defenders have all this space to defend whilst the attack have this space to run into, it works better for the attacker).

No matter how you slice it, you can't run an uptempo offence with Giroud on the pitch and that means sideways soccer and an over-reliance on crosses into the box, thereby negating many of the very reasons Lacazette was on your radar in the first place... we simply aren't clinical enough from wide positions to continue with that approach, which is why many fans have been clamoring for a viable alternative to Giroud for several years... once again this isn't an attack on Giroud, he clearly has some tangible skills, but his mere presence on the pitch greatly impacts your tactical options... Giroud's weaknesses are simply highlighted by the way in which our offence now moves in a more horizontal than vertical manner, which allows most teams ample time to regroup defensively before a scoring opportunity even arises... a player of Ibra's or Benzema's ilk would have been far more effective as they had size, speed and the first touch capabilities required to for intricate link - up play... once again square peg in a round hole

That means the attack will be able to play the width of the field and make the opposition run ragged without the ball.

I mean the long run, who can create entire club set ups, use a working attacking phlosophy, and nurture / spot young Fabregas's Bellerin's Henry's etc etc..

He provided a similarly excellent delivery for Nacho Monreal at Wembley, and having him in the wing - back position does mean he can vary Arsenal's attack down the right by either running at the full - back or delivering a cross.

More than that, though, is that Ramsey provides balance: an understanding of space and movement that means his late attacking runs create space for others or stretches play.

A sensational bursting run down Tottenham's vulnerable right saw Moreno hit his first goal for the club; his left foot would become a trademark of his attacking flair; a John - Arne Riise-esque ability to hit the ball with ferocity means he's always a danger when the ball comes to him outside the box, and his presence down the left hand flank when, throughout Rodgers» entire tenure, the closest thing Liverpool had to a combative defensive midfielder was Lucas, and he didn't afford much cover to either flank.

Child care assistance is useful but the real terms cuts made to family tax credits, and the attacks on our members pay means any financial support they receive in 2015 will have been wiped out in the years running up to its introduction.

It has received a number of attacks from the network over the years; it is big, complicated and a good place to begin hacking into a system because it runs with «super-user» privilege, which means that it can access any file on the machine.

After lifting the immunity clause on all government officials for the upcoming Purge, the NFFA plots to eliminate Roan by attacking the senator at her well - guarded home in Washington, D.C. Forced to go on the run when a trusted staff member betrays them, Leo cautiously teams up with some fellow survivors — including corner shop owner Joe (Mykelti Williamson), Mexican immigrant Marcos (Joseph Julian Soria) and reformed gangbanger Laney (Betty Gabriel)-- in order to protect Roan by any means necessary.

Whilst this is demonstrative of education institutions moving with the digital tide, the fact that the average size of a UK university runs into the ten thousands means the likelihood of an infected device spreading malicious attacks across the entire campus is ever more probable.

Take, for example, how you only jump and run on the horizontal plane, meaning you can't jump or run diagonally or vertically, so the only way to dodge some attacks is to walk very slowly around them which looks extremely odd..

If you needed a further reason to deal with enemies quickly whenever they are engaged with you, which means they get placed in your «threat» area, you're unable to do anything other than run away or fight without incurring an enemy attack.

- Revelations 1 and 2 are based on the PlayStation 4 and Xbox One versions - Joy - Con support with motion control and HD Rumble - Joy - Con share play is only available in Revelations 2 - all DLC is already included from the start - supports multiple languages in both voice and text - local co-op - Revelations features a 1080p resolution when playing on a television, and 720p resolution in portable mode - Revelations is 60 fps - by holding ZL on the Joy - Con, you can aim your gun with the right Joy - Con's motion control - use the left Joy - Con as a magazine to simulate a reloading motion - other motion controls include slashing horizontally to simulate a knife attack, and swinging for a quick reload - motion controls are optional and can be set to on or off from the options settings - motion controls are not supported with the Pro Controller - classic controls are also available - HD Rumble allows for more detailed and complex vibrations, meaning new kinds of rumble not available in PS4 / XB1 versions - Revelations 2 also runs at 1080p when playing on a television - Revelations 2 is not 60 fps - due to the fewer buttons available when sharing Joy - Con, the developers have said that it will have a unique control scheme

First of all, it's hilarious how your style meter will not drop down a letter until you get hit which means you can keep an SSS rating for as long as you want while running in circles and not attacking anyone.

The problem with this is it means you are micromanaging everything and sometimes it's pointless — you go into tactical mode, throw a grenade where the enemy is and then run behind cover and shoot — you unpause and in the time it takes for him to throw the grenade, the enemy has moved and is now attacking someone else.

No Challenge mode means there's no way to tell the game you'd like to run through a number of attacks or specials before being celebrated for pulling them off, and it's an attitude of «Oh... you'll figure it out» that'll extends across the many hours you'll first invest.

Don't ever run off the path, cause in the woods and mountains you're likely to get attacked by beasts, and they mean always trouble.

This may be an overstatement, but I've always thought that dishwasher soaps are meant to attack food, so if you run what are essentially clean dishes through a dishwasher, the soap has nothing to attack other than the finish on your dishes.

Accordingly, Armis wasn't aware of patches for Linux operating systems, meaning anything running BlueZ are vulnerable to one of the vectors, while those with Linux version 3.3 - rc1 can be attacked by another.

The attack is considered one of minimal value, however, and executives see the move as more of a «dry - run,» meant as a proof - of - concept to hit «other blockchains based on Ethereum with higher market caps.»

Although this sort of lateral violence is not new, the use of technology means that a lot more people can receive this hurtful information, compared to verbally «carrying yarns» or spreading malicious gossip and «running people down» by making personal attacks on their character and credibility.