Sentences with phrase «attacking side to me»

The problem I have with Song is he does not have an attacking side to him.

If that wasn't enough, there was also an attacking side to his game that racked up an impressive thirteen career goals - including one at international level - and his forays into the opposition's penalty area could lead to all sorts of confusion and indirectly led to Teddy Sheringham's late equaliser against Bayern Munich in the 1999 European Cup Final.

Not exact matches

As the name suggests, KAISER seeks to defend the kernel memory from a so - called side - channel attack that exploits a design feature of modern processors that increases their speed.

While an EMC has merchandise to sell and is using its energies to seek out buyers, an ETC attacks the other side of the trading coin.

Passionate followers — quick to judge the other side as stupid or incorrigible — then pursue heated discourse and hurl ad hominem attacks, making calm and rational discussion all but impossible.

And as a nice side - effect, it provides protection against Distributed Denial of Service attacks (DDoS), the most common brute force method that bad guys use to take a website down, by simply routing web traffic around the stoppage.

But Congress is even less willing to tame entitlements than attack the discretionary side, and President Trump has already pledged not to touch Medicare and Social Security.

If Trump decides to attack Winfrey again, he should take into account that DeGeneres is on her side.

Merck chief executive Ken Frazier set off a parade of departures from Donald Trump's CEO - packed jobs councils — and Trump's subsequent decision to disband those groups before even more business leaders could leave them — following the President's widely criticized response to white supremacist attacks in Charlottesville, Virginia in mid-August blaming «many sides» for the violence.

Following recent terror attacks in Paris, France, San Bernardino, Calif., and elsewhere, the two sides — often at odds on other matters (encryption, for instance)-- have seemed more willing to cooperate on tackling certain problems like online extremism.

Neither ethereum nor ethereum classic seemed to prepare for the attacks, but the resulting gap in communications means that neither side is really pursuing action.

White House lawyer Ty Cobb, who will leave at the end of the month, was one of the few at Trump's side urging the president to refrain from personally attacking Mueller and to comply with the prosecutor's requests.

Mr. Cohen is a longtime lawyer and fixer who, in a decade at Mr. Trump's side, has served as a reliable attack dog against real or perceived threats to him.

My company had raised a seed round of capital in late 1999 even before either of us were full time in the company (ominous side note: on the way to pitch our seed investor, Delta Partners, a man walking right in front of me died of a massive heart attack making me late to the meeting.

«We don't need to be attacked by the self - righteous on the other side.

Ben: Yes, well, as I was saying, we're at this unique cultural moment in history where orthodox faith is under attack from all sides and we're barely communicating our faith to the next generation.

Instead, each side has capitulated - each in its own way - to the philistine notion that art is necessarily about power: that all works of art, including the world's great masterpieces, are best understood as either attacks on the established social order or defenses of it....

Right now there is great temptation for both sides of the standard culture - war divide to use this attack for political advantage.

But another side to the failure of so many pastors is that pastors are undergoing incredible amounts of spiritual attack, and the people of their church are not lifting and supporting their pastor in prayer as they should be.

This has been the most helpful response I've encountered since being attacked by the ugly side of Calvinism a few years ago (and being kicked out of church for refusing to repent of «my pride in believing that I accepted Jesus as my Savior»).

The drug has an unfortunate side effect of tricking the immune system into attacking healthy cells, but the relative damage was insignificant compared to what cancer would have done to them.

What the article omitted is that the Egyptians failed to police their side of the border to prevent Palestinian and Al Queda terrorists from attacking Israel from Sinai and killing innocent Israeli civilians.

Some might see glaring faults from a guy named «Attack of the 50 Foot Magic Underwear» who seems to think he has the facts on his side, when in reality he is just as small - minded and un-educated as the people he professes to be better than.

The concept of once saved always saved takes a bit to get your head around but Gods grace is greater than our sin and greater than our good works it just takes faith in Jesus Christ to recieve Gods grace.In saying that to continue to sin as a christian is like playing with fire you will be burnt.Paul talks of the sexual immorality in corinthian church of the son and father that were sleeping with the same wife they were excommunicated from the church the members were not allowed to even eat with them until they repented.There are consequences for our actions.The other side to this is that if you continue to sin as a christian you are not walking by faith but walking by the flesh and are really backsliding.In the backslidden state you also become powerless and open to attack by satan as long as we walk in the flesh he can influence us to get worse not better.If we are walking in Christ satan may still try to tempt us but we are empowered by the holy spirit and overcome him and our faith increases.Both are saved by grace but one is powerless because of sin versus saved but an overcomer having been set free from sin i think this is what Paul was trying to explain.It is better to be an overcomer than overcome by sin.brentnz

Personal Attack on John Musick # 8: «As much as we may hate to admit it, there are two sides to every story.

Then the same pastors suggested that we know what caused the attack and why we deserved it: either we, as a country, had failed to rid the world of poverty or, on the other side of the political ledger, we had tolerated lax moral standards.

As the frequently quoted president of the American Atheists and a constant thorn in the side of religious organizations, attack mode comes easily to him.

To attack something when you're too ignorant of the facts (and too lazy to be bothered to learn about the opposing side) to even know what you're attacking only shows how much society has to gain by embracing the scientific method (even if you reject some theoriesTo attack something when you're too ignorant of the facts (and too lazy to be bothered to learn about the opposing side) to even know what you're attacking only shows how much society has to gain by embracing the scientific method (even if you reject some theoriesto be bothered to learn about the opposing side) to even know what you're attacking only shows how much society has to gain by embracing the scientific method (even if you reject some theoriesto learn about the opposing side) to even know what you're attacking only shows how much society has to gain by embracing the scientific method (even if you reject some theoriesto even know what you're attacking only shows how much society has to gain by embracing the scientific method (even if you reject some theoriesto gain by embracing the scientific method (even if you reject some theories).

PS: I blew the whistle on atrocities in Viet Nam where USA forces murdered 2 million people and was attacked by our side and I had to hide for 10 years before I was able to get into medical school.

And now Bill Nye has chosen to take the side of attacking atheists who don't want to allow for freedom of religion.

The question was remitted to the Council of Jerusalem (c. A.D. 49), where Peter, convinced by Paul's attack upon his conduct at Antioch, took Paul's side (Gal.

If you scroll up, you'll see one side presenting a position, and the other attacking what it appears to be weaknesses..

If a man is under attack to the core of his being and he lashes out, it's ok if he represents your side, but not the other?

Last month I outlined how writing anything on creation and evolution is controversial and that I realised I was exposing myself to attack from one side...

This protects you from the «attack» of the Other, you think... but if you ask me, it brings up enough negative energy in you to have a spiritual breakdown, like Job, and to side only with people, who hold to Scripture, blindly - in other words, to side with those who have not learned to trust that thinking for themselves, as individuals, is a good thing.

where to start... you have IDers wanting that taught along side evolution as if that puedo - science would stand up in school, you have religious folks attacking the schools over different parts of the curriculum.

The claim is open to attack from two sides.

In the world of politics, President George W. Bush asserted the unity side of the argument more than once in the years after the 9/11 attacks - often as a way to deflect accusations that America was at war with Islam.

We attacked each other so routinely and vigorously in emails and comments sections that students on both sides changed class schedules and social circles to avoid their antagonists.

I hope he will be good - humored enough to realize that such a chapter as I have just written is not meant to be an attack upon science but an attack upon that one - sided obsession with the material and the tangible which leads to the loss of spiritual apprehension.

• Arafat and the PA, whose popularity has been declining since 1995, have been further discredited, having failed to obtain self - determination and independence, or to end Israeli settlement and land seizure, while imprisoning Palestinians for attacking Israel, as part of a one - sided bargain which Israel has never respected.

That being said, I think I will attack Syria, Saudi Arabia & Yemen because they don't like Israel and God loves them so I want to be on the right side.

Both sides need to try opening their minds and accepting rather than attacking.

Westerners can denounce Muslim practices like the death penalty for apostasy (a very rare occurrence, by the way), but are we also willing to condemn violence perceived to be committed by «our» side — things like invasions, occupations and drone attacks that kill a disproportionate amount of civilians?

A positioning statement elicits a reaction and is met by a challenge, a cycle that often goes through several iterations before one or both sides gives up out of frustration, explodes into ad - hominem attacks or «agrees to disagree.»

To everybody: 9/11 was an attack on all of us — everybody in the Western World and everybody who did not side with Osama bin Laden.

Thus he is attacked from both sides; but both attacks are in error since they fail to read that sentence, and one or two similar ones, in their proper context.

He proposed a «civilian truce,» meaning both sides would agree not to attack civilians.

A dialectical methodology seeks to be both radical and catholic in such a way that the radical side is not just an «attack,» but the critical word of the tradition itself to judge, transform and renew it in new and more humanizing ways for all of us.

I eat chia «porridge» (made by soaking them in liquid) with fruit for breakfast and have never had a problem with them like I do when eating phytate - rich foods such as nuts and coconut and beans; I get a cramp like pain on my mid-right side which starts anywhere from 15 minutes to a few hours or more after eating these typical foods and the attack intensifies and lasts a couple of hours to longer, depending on how much and when I eat them.