There were legitimate debates between scientists working in this field about how reliable different kinds of proxy data are and what are the limits, what are the uncertainties, and then there were the dishonest
attacks against the science.
Not exact matches
The rest of the COMPETES bill would severely lower authorized funding levels for the social and behavioral
sciences, geosciences, and international activities at NSF — cuts that are in line with the committee's ideological stance that they play small roles in fostering innovation, bolstering the U.S. economy, and defending the nation
against attack.
[F] ight back when necessary to defend your
science against bad faith
attacks, but the best defense here is a good offense.
Yong described the post, in a subsequent blog post of his own, as «a mixture of critiques of the
science within the paper, and personal
attacks against the researchers, PLOS ONE, the journal that published it, and me, who covered it.»
And that campaign, involving all sorts of organizations that have lobbied
against climate change legislation, has led some people to conclude that this is connected to a larger campaign by special interests to
attack the
science of climate change, to prevent policy action from being taken to deal with the problem.
Leiserowitz also attributes the rise in conservative belief to a reduction of
attacks against climate
science and policy in Congress and on the campaign trail.
Researchers have even begun to test whether hydrogen sulfide can protect us
against the damage associated with heart
attacks and strokes (
Science, 30 May 2008, p. 1155).
In summary, the problem seems to be that the circling of the wagons strategy developed by small groups of climate researchers in response to the politically motivated
attacks against climate
science are now being used
against other climate researchers and the more technical blogs (e.g. Climateaudit, Lucia, etc).
He is the principal investigator of an NCI - funded, multi-million-dollar Specialized Program of Research Excellence (SPORE) in ovarian cancer, and he is the principal investigator of a multi-million-dollar grant from the New York State Stem Cell
Science program (NYSTEM) to pioneer a novel strategy of reprogramming human mature T cells and hematopoietic stem cells for generating sustained
attack against ovarian cancer in patients.
«I repeat Sturgeon's Revelation, which was wrung out of me after twenty years of wearying defense of
science fiction
against attacks of people who used the worst examples of the field for ammunition, and whose conclusion was that ninety percent of SF is crud.
Mom Launches War
Against Bestselling Book About Race,
Science - Another day, another
attack on a book.
Scientists should spent their time on
science and not on defending themselves
against attacks from politicians associated to the oil industry.
Jim: thanks so much for writing about the
attacks against climate scientists so cogently and eloquently in «The Inquisition of Climate
Science».
You can bet all WSJ
attacks against you or the
science were planted by one of these well - funded, Exxon subsidiaries.
He has not defended the
science against the ongoing, withering and dishonest
attacks.
My concern was in that the preponderance of
attacks against the NIPPC reports seem to little to nothing to do with the
science documented within, but rather the source of funding.
First, the campaign in the 1920s
against Einstein's general theory of relativity provides an uncannily complete template for the conservative
attack on climate
science eight decades later.
She wrote
Attack on Coal Will Not Save Lives, and as President of DDP below, supports many
attacks against climate
science, below.
And it is intensly political and involves all kind of
attacks, conspiracies, and most importantly — almost no
science, as well as ascribing ill - intent
against those who have had a role in developing, or accept, the new paradigm.
I felt all this, and I wanted to fight the good fight
against the dark forces, especially when I saw them
attacking the part of climate
science that I was personally associated with.
Mhyre has been very poorly mentored by climate «scientists» to commit illogical rhetorical
attacks rather than upholding true
science by exploring ALL models and testing them
against ALL data.
Her ad hominem
attacks of «climate denier» and «irresponsible»
against Judith Curry are severely damaging climate
science, nullifying Mhyre's arguments.
However, he received lots of
attacks against him rejecting climate
science by conservative Republicans.
Now, that integrated knowledge does not constitute a dogma, nor does defending the
science against an onslaught of distortion, misinformation and personal
attacks.
That said, I don't retract my main point which is that the Academy needs to take a much more vigorous line
against the
attacks on
science and individual scientists which have become a pervasive feature of Australian political commentary.
She develops federal campaigns and strategies that ensure a robust defense
against attacks on
science and
science - based policy.
He has spent much of his time as the chair of the House
Science Committee going on the
attack against climate scientists.
Such
attacks are less about the
science on offer from dissenters, and more to do with singling out those who go
against the political consensus that the world is doomed unless we reduce our carbon footprint now.
Bart:» All I see is a propaganda campaign forming an
attack on
science by trumping up charges against a paper in S
science by trumping up charges
against a paper in
ScienceScience.
Reacting
against this rather miserabilist and dystopian worldview, the political right has increasingly adopted an outright denialist position —
attacking the
science in a covert war
against the political ideology it has been co-opted to serve.
All I see is a propaganda campaign forming an
attack on
science by trumping up charges against a paper in S
science by trumping up charges
against a paper in
ScienceScience.
They are also the most cynical since I know many know the
science is garbage but love the emotionally based hate
against private interests in the hopes
attacking «big oil» or creating wealth redistribution schemes.
Environmental justice advocates say that the
attacks on
science represent irresponsible political malpractice
against the people of the U.S. by officials who are sworn to uphold the public interest.
Reacting in outrage and disgust
against the personal
attacks leveled
against them, and contriving to present their results in ways that could not be misread, the scientists had used phrases that their attackers twisted to support the claim that climate
science was nothing but a politicized sham.
UCS set the record straight in several recent instances of misinformation about climate
science, and fought back
against deliberate
attacks on climate scientists, including:
In which case, the
attacks against the M&W paper is correct: the paper doesn't support the conclusion made of it, ignores the
science completely, and reads more like a tabloid editorial than a research paper.
The public money actually set up for the defense of
science against attack is, I venture, precisely zero in the US, and small elsewhere.
Schneider also wanted scientists to fight back
against attacks on
science.
... and, tempting as it may be to avoid facing our ignorance by engaging in ad hom
attacks against others — quantum mechanics or no quantum mechanics — without experimental confirmation climate
science has zero credibility.
As the 1990s progressed and the rear - guard action
against restrictions on smoking faded, The Advancement of Sound
Science Coalition started receiving funds from Exxon (among other oil companies) and its «junk science» website began to carry material attacking climate change s
Science Coalition started receiving funds from Exxon (among other oil companies) and its «junk
science» website began to carry material attacking climate change s
science» website began to carry material
attacking climate change
sciencescience.
... a mounting, well organized, and well funded last,
attack, a Battle of the Bulge if you will,
against the
science... Most don't accept the seriousness of the battle we are going to face here.
The ad hominem
attacks we see here are a diversion from Monckton's
science, and follow the Alinsky script: always personalize the
attacks against the individual, and don't ever respond to what he is saying.
In fact, if you consider the rhetoric from the left, it's personal
attacks against individuals who dare question the consensus «
science» whereas the rhetoric coming from the right is largely, if not exclusively
attacking the
science itself.
Interestingly, he says»... the campaign in the 1920s
against Einstein's general theory of relativity provides an uncannily complete template for the conservative
attack on climate
science eight decades later.»
Finding spies, preventing leaks and defending
against attacks are harder problems, and are probably not ready for legislation quite yet, but «solved problems in computer
science» can legitimately become a different kind of «code» any time now.