Sentences with phrase «attacks on climate research»

On 7 May, Science published a letter from 255 members of the National Academy of Sciences decrying attacks on climate research.

A photograph of a polar bear standing balefully on a small ice floe was used to illustrate the letter from 255 members of the National Academy of Sciences decrying attacks on climate research and pressing for swift action to blunt global warming.

House science committee chairman touts attacks on climate research before friendly audience

I was and still am gravely concerned about this defunding of NASA's very important climate work (the budget is still being hammered out between the House and Senate), but even when I first wrote about the NASA budget, I wondered to myself if this attack on climate research would be limited to just NASA, given that those other federal agencies study climate as well.

Not exact matches

The research, which was to study the effects of environmental stress due to climate change on shrimp and other economically - important species, was attacked as another example of wasteful government spending.

In an early primary field crammed with 16 candidates, presidential hopefuls could find traction by attacking Obama's climate policies, said Jeremy Carl, a research fellow at Stanford University's Hoover Institution who has advised a number of the candidates on energy and climate.

Pielke has been something of a lightning rod in climate debates, sometimes drawing attacks from all sides as a result of his views on research and policy.

Science marchers will rally Saturday to express their concerns about perceived attacks on evidence and research, and climate marchers worried about U.S. policy are set to jam the streets of the nation's capital 7 days later.

Researchers including Michael Mann of Pennsylvania State University, University Park, and Gavin Schmidt of NASA, say that Heartland was one of the groups that attacked scientists based on the stolen emails, which were purloined from the University of East Anglia's climate research unit.

From a climate policy perspective, the bill can be seen as part of the Conservative ongoing effort to 1) gut environmental assessments and scientific research; 2) attack ENGOs that disagree with government policy to promote unfettered development of the oil sands; and 3) to sideline and even eliminate inconvenient advisory bodies like the National Roundtable on Energy and the Environment.

Earlier this year, I criticized his habit of launching largely overheated and unsubstantiated attacks on climate scientists, but credited him for assembling a talented research team centered on the gifted data analyst Robert Rohde (you'll hear from Rohde below), to take a new approach to compiling and analyzing temperature records going back two centuries.

But, in his defense, he clearly did have vast challenges on his plate then, fending off heaps of unwarranted attacks and now dealing with a mountain of Freedom of Information requests (not to mention his ongoing research into climate change).

During that time he was oblivious to the attacks on Ben Santer being waged by S. Fred Singer, Frederick Seitz, Patrick Michaels, Global Climate Coalition (a group of fossil fuel interests) and others because Santer's (and others) research showed that humans were in fact causing climate to change (IPCC 2nd Assessment,Climate Coalition (a group of fossil fuel interests) and others because Santer's (and others) research showed that humans were in fact causing climate to change (IPCC 2nd Assessment,climate to change (IPCC 2nd Assessment, 1995).

The problem is the attack on climate science and the overwhelming consensus, not the research supporting it.

Then wait for all attacks on hadcrut in general to start coming out of the woodwork: «it's a Climate Research Unit record!»

Dr. Mörner attacked the science of climate change, while claiming that he is mission on Sea Level Change of INQUA (International nion for Quaternary Research).

The result is that a panel with vast jurisdiction over all government non-military science, research and development has become an instrument of attack on mainstream climate science.

This has followed an «attack on science», which Nurse explained in a somewhat one - sided account of the «Climategate» affair, the leaking of thousands of emails from the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia in November 2009.

And it might come as a shock to people who saw how Ioannidis» work has been abused on this blog in order to attack mainstream climate science research.

«ExxonMobil pioneered climate - change research since the 1970s, and now it's attacking media reporting on that,» by Steve LeVine, Quartz, October 26, 2015.

The United Nations» Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), already under severe criticism for violating the requirements of academic peer review and relying on secondary sources, comes under attack again in a new report co-produced by three nonprofit research organizations.

America Rising Advanced Research has launched an aggressive social media campaign against leading figures in the US environmental movement, including creating the website Core News which features attacks on prominent climate policy advocates including Bill McKibben, Tom Steyer and Leonardo DiCaprio.

This denier pre-emption of social science research echoes Frank Luntz» infamous 2002 memo advising Republicans to attack the scientific consensus on climate change in order to erode public support for climate policies - long before social scientists began researching the link between perception of consensus and support for climate action.

His writings attack both the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the UN body assigned to review and report on developments in climate research, and the Kyoto Protocol, the 1997 treaty to reduce greenhouse gas polClimate Change (IPCC), the UN body assigned to review and report on developments in climate research, and the Kyoto Protocol, the 1997 treaty to reduce greenhouse gas polclimate research, and the Kyoto Protocol, the 1997 treaty to reduce greenhouse gas pollution.

Call me cynical, but after more than a decade of research and writing into the role big fossil fuel companies have played in sponsoring coordinated attacks on climate science with public relations spin, I remain unconvinced we won't see a resurgence in climate denial.