I have no interest in Kathleen Sebelius»
attacks on religion or yours either.
I spoke of the earlier generation, influenced by the grand gestures of modernism and sensitive to the aggressive early twentieth - century secularist
attacks on religion, as writers inclined to «shout.»
For all the complaints of
attacks on religion coming from Christians, you would think you would not attack yourselves.
That may change as atheists become bolder in
their attacks on religion.
Similarly, attacks on the evils of society are indirectly
attacks on religion.
He called for
attacks on religion.
Scientific
attacks on religion will always slide off, which is why I rarely use it in my arguments.
Since Marx directs
his attacks on religion in the name of man, against the alienation of man from his own potentialities and purposes, it constitutes, for that reason, the greatest challenge to Christianity in our time.
It is precisely this outdated theology of natural or «intelligent» design that is the target of the simplistic
attacks on religion by new atheist writers.
Justin Brierley reflects on the atheist's most famous
attack on religion in his book God Is Not Great.
Its pretty simple and not
an attack on religion.
It's only to continue to
attack on religion and continue with the divisive policy CNN drives.
That data directly conflicts with religious texts and you think it is
an attack on religion?
* that * is why this particular agenda is being perceived as «
an attack on religion» (regardless of whether one defends the Arizona bill).
Another CNN
attack on religion...
Please do not mistake not getting your way with
an attack on religion.
As long as the argument is focused on
the attack on religion, they maintain an advantage.
In a long series of captivating thumbnail biographical sketches, he documents both the force of the modern mind's
attack on religion and the grief that accompanied it as people lamented losing the aesthetic and moral dimensions of faith.
CNN only did this story as
an attack on religions deemed strange by some in an effort to stir the whole Romney Mormon church deal... to scare people.
Everyone will now say I am part of that infamous «
attack on religion.»
Assertions that Protestantism is against religion, or that Christianity or revelation is
an attack on religion, have, of course, been with us for a considerable time now, and nearly everybody has had a word to say on the subject.
Along with this goes a sharp
attack on religion which we have defined as any system using God to meet a need or to solve a problem, even the problem of not having a God.
PLEASE explain how a mandate of healthcare coverage by an EMPLOYER, which believe me there are many others already out there (ie, healthy women check ups, breast care exams, prostate check ups, mammogram coverage, annual check ups) is now an «
attack on religion»?
Waiting here refers to the whole experience I have called «the death of God,» including
the attack on religion and the search for a means by which God, not needed, may be enjoyed.
The following quote, taken directly from the article, shows that people tend to see this artifact as a religious symbol, and that Christians interpret 9/11 as being
an attack on their religion.
Or is this really about
an attack on a religion you don't agree with?»
There will also be those within the party who remain wilfully ignorant, and who see any attempt to align Labour and secularist values as
an attack on religion.
Cardinal John O'Connor also criticized the work at the time of the Brooklyn show, saying in one sermon, «I'm saddened by what appears to be an attack not only on our blessed mother... but one must ask if it is not
an attack on religion itself and in a special way on the Catholic Church.»
Not exact matches
Then Scientists should keep their collective noses out of
religion and let the faithful get
on with their beliefs without having someone
attack them.
But as matters now stand, the government
attack on the Branch Davidians is among the most blatant and costly instances of state persecution of
religion in American history.
Whether one agrees with his politics or thinks he'd be a competent president is a different matter — but thank you for writing a great article
on religion and avoiding the
attacking, degrading and slandering of other writers» approach, which - while probably provoking interest and getting many reads - is simply disappointing and quite frankly hypocritical when it comes to
religion.
Always amusing to see the atheists
on here that immediately
attack «rich» churches or
religions.
If anyone started doing something like this to Mormons, l bet you would never hear the end of complaining, calling it an
attack on their freedom of belief & freedom of
religion.
A christian shouldn't feel their
religion is under
attack if they can't wear something
on their chest or if they work at a place devoted to science and can't talk about ID
I see so CNN feels the need for yet another
attack on Christianity... Why doesn't CNN speak about other
religions?
Washington (CNN)-- When he campaigns in southern Florida
on Monday, Mitt Romney will have an unwelcome traveling partner: a mobile billboard
attacking his
religion.
In one ad, he promised to «end Obama's war
on religion» and to «fight against liberal
attacks on our religious heritage.»
In Part 1 and Part 2 of this 3 - Part series
on how Satan casts out Satan, we learned that Satan uses violent
religion to
attack and kill the messengers of God, and thus, appear to be «casting out Satan» while in reality, he is only solidifying his own power and influence in the world.
People who
attack the idea of
religion (which is happening
on this board) because the RCC does not do enough to eradicate poverty should also
attack the idea of secularism because the Brazilian government has not done enough to eradicate poverty.
All books about other
religions, for example, are written by Christians as
attacks on other
religions.
This guy was
on another article few days ago, and he was
attacking muslims and other
religions, and all of you were considering him a hero, but now he is a jerk!!!!!! lol
In contrast to Enlightenment and revolutionary Europe, strong vitriolic
attacks on traditional
religion of the écraser - l'infâme sort were virtually absent in the colonies.
Long before Roman armies demolished the temple
on Zion, however, the sacrificial system had been
attacked by the prophets as a peril to true
religion.
He is polite and genuine, and whether you're religous or not, he gets
attacked with accusations of «pushing his
religion»
on everyone.
His
attack on the other - worldliness of
religion is found in a 1932 address, «Thy Kingdom Come!»
«It is a clear
attack on the church and our
religion which is not acceptable.
I do feel I need to reach out to the ones who hold my belief or non belief LOL in God to simply realize that
religion is not going anywhere and an
attack on the religious only appears pathetic.
«They»
attack the others as well, but in the west, you hear more about the judeo - christian god because
religions based
on that god are far more prevalent.
we don't like people who
attack us and we can see the writing
on the wall what that
religion turns into.
3) States» non-endorsement of any
religion is not an
attack on Christianity... are you inferring that statute is Obama's doing?