Due to this general disconnect between achievement and
attainment effects of choice programs and, in a few cases in our sample, individual choice schools, we caution commentators and regulators to be more humble and circumspect in judging school choice programs and schools of choice based solely on their test score effects.
Not exact matches
The report, conducted by a group
of volunteer economists, is the first independent review
of its kind on the
effect that undertaking practical, hands - on science projects can have on student
attainment and subject
choice.
Let's briefly review the results from the three rigorous examinations
of the
effect of private school
choice on educational
attainment.
«ACT for all: The
effect of mandatory college entrance exams on postsecondary
attainment and
choice.»
The achievement
effects of choice programs after just one or two years may well turn out to be misleading indicators
of the longer - term
effects on test scores and
attainment.
The
effects of choice programs on educational
attainment — how far an individual goes in school — are both larger and more consistent than their achievement
effects.
As a result
of our findings
of no consistent statistical association between the achievement and
attainment effects in school
choice studies we urged commentators and policymakers «to be more humble» in judging school
choice programs or schools
of choice based solely or primarily on initial test score
effects.
The fallacy is in assuming that the majority
of choice studies reporting positive
effects on test scores is the same majority
of choice studies reporting positive
effects on
attainment.
of choice studies reporting positive
effects on
attainment.
In Mike's second post criticizing our study he claims that the test score
effects of choice programs do reliably and positively predict their
attainment effects because, after throwing out some cases (I'll get to that later), «both short - term test scores and long - term outcomes are overwhelmingly positive.»
In our study we draw upon the findings from 24 evaluations
of various types
of school
choice programs to show that the achievement
effects from those programs are only weakly and inconsistently predictive
of their subsequent
attainment effects.
Last week, Mike Petrilli, President
of the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, published a series
of blog posts at the Education Gadfly and Education Next critiquing an AEI study by Dr. Collin Hitt, Dr. Michael McShane, and myself discussing the surprising disconnect between the achievement and
attainment effects from school
choice programs in the US.
Further, he notes, «the
effects of private - school -
choice programs on educational
attainment — how far an individual goes in school — are both larger and more consistent than their achievement
effects,» with programs narrowly targeted to low - income, urban students proving to be the most effective.
Longitudinal evaluations
of the
effects of the Milwaukee Parental
Choice Program (MPCP), the voucher program initiated by Governor Thompson, indicate that student achievement outcomes were not consistently affected by vouchers but other vital student outcomes, including educational attainment, civic values, criminal proclivities as well as parent and student satisfaction were positively influenced by participation in private school c
Choice Program (MPCP), the voucher program initiated by Governor Thompson, indicate that student achievement outcomes were not consistently affected by vouchers but other vital student outcomes, including educational
attainment, civic values, criminal proclivities as well as parent and student satisfaction were positively influenced by participation in private school
choicechoice.
I apply the method to linked administrative data spanning the state
of Texas, using continuous instrumental variation in distances to nearby 2 - year and 4 - year colleges (conditional on a rich set
of student, school, and neighborhood characteristics) to identify the
effects of initial enrollment
choices on ultimate degree
attainment and adult earnings.
Flip through our complete summary
of the high - quality empirical research conducted on school
choice programs to date, including evidence based on students» test scores (
of those using programs and those who remain in public schools), long - term educational
attainment, integration / segregation, fiscal
effects and students» civic values.
We know from the body
of school
choice research on the experimental
effects on test scores that short term test scores may not be predictive
of long term achievement or
attainment.
ACT for All: The
Effect of Mandatory College Entrance Exams on Postsecondary
Attainment and
Choice