Of course, that might be more of
an attitude than a philosophy, but I still like it.
Not exact matches
Here is something from Jordan Bajis, (and trust me, nothing is more Orthodox
than this, he writes for the Eastern Orthodox Book, «Common Ground», page 50 of his book: «Everyone brings something to the text, i.e,
philosophies, experiences, emotions,
attitudes, etc..
But perhaps, even more so
than metrics, what's important is to have the right
attitude and
philosophy when it comes to user support.
In my opinion, the
philosophy and
attitudes expressed here — concerns about potential critics being on «the scent» — and the associated conduct — withholding adverse information about verification r ^ 2 statistics and big misses — are far more repugnant
than revealing the identity of a peer reviewer.
But what if reaching customers were more about
attitude and
philosophy than goals, metrics, and budgeting?