Not exact matches
Similarly, Baptists hold that «the eternal triune God reveals Himself to us as Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, with distinct
personal attributes, but without division
of nature, essence, or being.»
11 In God's covenant with Moses and, through Moses, with the people
of the exodus, the being
of God acquired «an explicitly
personal character» 12 that countered anthropomorphizing tendencies «primarily through the experience
of the infinite superiority
of the divine
nature to all merely human
attributes and capacities — an experience which marks every encounter with the divine in the Old Testament.»
An interesting study
of christological models has been written by John McIntyre.4 The «two -
natures model» (which he takes as a single complex model involving both divine and human
natures) has dominated Christian thought, but it has a number
of limitations; it is tied to the Aristotelian categories
of substance and
attribute, and it tends to view the incarnation as the assumption
of an abstract human
nature rather than the
personal individuality
of a particular man.
36Many process thinkers
attribute this intermediary role to God's consequent
nature, because otherwise, in their opinion, no envisagement and / or no provision
of specific initial aims would be possible (e.g., Christian, IWM 306 - 308; John Lansing, «The «
Natures»
of Whitehead's God,» Process Studio 3 [1973), 143 - 152, at 147 - 148; Suchocki, MGWG 243 - 245; Lewis S. Ford, «When Did Whitehead Conceive God to be
Personal?»
BookofMatches attempts to connect people based on certain
attributes and
personal characteristics such as habits, lifestyle, religion, physical fitness, smoking and other things
of that
nature.