Sentences with phrase «author a question with»

You can pose questions to the Goodreads community with Reader Q&A, or ask your favorite author a question with Ask the Author.

Not exact matches

And the author follows with a layer - by - layer set of innuendos larded with arcane technical jargon and rhetorical questions to advance his deep and dark accusation.

When faced with curveball questions such as these, best - selling management author and CNBC contributor Suzy Welch says the best way to respond is to carefully think over your answer before blurting it out.

«By asking this question, you can uncover exactly what issues the hiring organization has identified and is currently dealing with,» says Heather McNab, author of What Top Professionals Need to Know About Answering Job Interview Questions.

In an interview with CNBC, psychologist and bestselling author Dan Ariely recently offered a dead simple suggestion to accomplish this — ask yourself just one question.

However, David Burkus, associate professor of management at Oral Roberts University and author of the forthcoming book Under New Management, questions whether that obsession with secrecy might do a company culture more harm than good.

We encourage you to use comments to engage with users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other.

Andrea Vahl @andreavahl Author, Speaker and Social Media Strategist at AndreaVahl.com Presenting: Facebook Advertising: Your Questions Answered by Top Experts and How to Build a Facebook Marketing Funnel With Ads and More

Futurist, change management specialist and «X: The Experience When Business Meets Design» author Brian Solis sits down with The Young Turks» Cenk Uygur to talk about the past, present and future and how more and faster change is coming, and the only question is whether you're going to be a part of that change or a victim of it.

This author was able to ask him a final question while having my photo taken with him.

In this paper, the authors started with the following question: «Do persistently low nominal interest rates mean that governments can safely borrow more?»

As I said, authorship of most of the books of the Bible are in question and tend only to be variants of the other stories, roughly in the same time period and «neighborhood» — most often with no specific author — therefore it is very reasonable to think they are just variations on the same story.

The issues with which the author deals and the questions he raises are aimed at those who would claim any absolute values in this life, including possessions, fame, success, or pleasure.

@mama k» As I said, authorship of most of the books of the Bible are in question and tend only to be variants of the other stories, roughly in the same time period and «neighborhood» — most often with no specific author — therefore it is very reasonable to think they are just variations on the same story.»»

TO THE AUTHOR: You unfriend people on Facebook because you ask a theological question and you're offended that people reply with what they believe?

Reading the account of how this professor expressed himself about the author's experience with the dying begs the question in my mind, - How many religious scholars and clergymen are as truly enlightened about life, death and the nature of things as they self - satisfyingly claim to be doctored in religion?

Finally, if the point of this author's essay is to conclude that we shouldn't waste our time on whether Judas is in heaven or hell, why bring it up in the first place with a headline that begs the question?

«He was just the wrong man for the wrong time, which is nothing to do with him as a person,» said Christopher M. Bellitto, author of the book «101 Questions and Answers on Popes and the Papacy.»

I think part of the problem with your closing questions is that the truth is, for some authors, their lives are often an extension or result of their toxic ideas.

(ENTIRE BOOK) The author deals with the question: Do we carry out our projects on a stage that is blind, neutral and indifferent?

2) name usage statistics do not guarantee the miraculous — but they certainly place an author in that immediate context (or at the very least, with direct access to someone who was from that immediate context), which is a MAJOR contingency that has been much debated in the question of authorship... which IS the topic you raised.

The author explores these elements and possible points of contact with elements in Christian tradition and experience, raising questions about religious language: reality, analogy and metaphor.

The authors of Scripture do not always speak with one voice, but this is because they are presenting the question of the character of God in different ways.

In the same way, the authors you have quoted seem so concerned with the question «What constitutes work?»

-- A Philosophical Question,» written in 1952 and quoted with the permission of the author.)

As the author notes in the beginning, this volume is not intended as a homily, but rather as a companion; and like a trusted companion, it does not simply conduct a one - sided soliloquy over history and texts, but behaves dynamically: telling stories, empathizing with human frailty, and anticipating questions.

The plain fact seems to be that both the Personhood of God and the doctrine of God's creation of heaven and earth were accepted by the authors of the New Testament with little question because they were already accepted in Judaism.

These are not questions with fixed answers, and while I don't agree with (or necessarily understand) all of the authors» conclusions, it is a welcome chance to step outside the paths that have been well trodden by a multitude of «science vs religion» books.

Demonstrating an affinity with the Romanticist tradition of Schleiermacher and Dilthey, these men seek to uncover the seminal experience or creative insight of the authors of the texts in question, the experience that was objectified in words.

The author closes with a chapter stating that while he does not judge or condemn those who see things differently that he does, he hopes such people will not condemn him either, but will allow him (and others) to face the difficult questions about church that need to be asked.

This author in my opinion deep inside is questioning her faith but like a security blanket to a child does not want to get rid of it and is looking for any explanation she can come up with to hold onto it even in the face of the reality that the text that faith is based upon is highly flawed and frankly quite silly.

With respect to the authority of the authors, the question is one of credentials.

The author deals with two questions raised by Hartshorne concerning the Whiteheadian understanding of the temporal structure of God.

[If you question their sincerity, consider this: One of the authors, Shane Claiborne, actually went to Baghdad during the 2003 «shock and awe» bombing campaign to hang out with civilians.

The author discusses Avodat Yisrael, a Messianic Jewish congregation in suburban Philadelphia which has more than casual relations with a Presbyterian Church — raising significant questions about the relationship between Jews and Christians.

In an article titled, Islam Needs an Age of Reason, Muslim writer and author of The Trouble with Islam Today, Irshad Manji, urges Muslims to question the modus operandiof their faith.

For the sake of the individual authors, I won't say which essays I didn't care for, although, since I was looking for specific information for a book I am writing, the fault was probably not with the authors themselves, but with the question I was researching.

I'll be attending as both an author and a church - planter, but with one big question in mind: What does it mean to celebrate Big Tent Christianity in small town America?

First, with regard to the question about the poor, the author is suggesting that these candidates make a big deal of their Christian beliefs, yet seem not to care at all about «the poor.»

@hippypoet «one can't ever understand the meaning of the AUTHORS being THEY are all dead, and there wasn't a lovely back section to help with questions and answers.»

But with an eBook, if I'm on a web - enabled device like the iPad, I can click on the link in the eBook, and go watch the video, or access the author's blog and ask him a question, or buy the book on Amazon that he referenced.

I think the author is displaying the best of being Jewish — critical thinking, questioning why she does things rather than just accepting everything with no questioning (which is very anti-Jewish in my opinion and seems to be what you suggest.)

In the last two chapters, the authors make their concluding assessment: first in social and political terms by analyzing the positions of evangelicals and Catholics with regard to main themes in American history; second in more biblical and theological terms as they seek to answer the question they set themselves in their title.

I appreciate the authors attempt to be real with her kids, but she never really addressed her original question of how to explain that she was not practicingthe tenets of her faith.

I chose Jesus for President (Zondervan, 2008) for our book club discussions, not because I agreed with all of the authors» conclusions, but because never before have I so deeply questioned whether or not I really take Jesus seriously.

David Dark, author of The Sacredness of Questioning Everything, seems to appreciate Colbert as well, for he begins his chapter on «Questioning Our Offendedness» with a «tip of the hat» to the comic genius of the caricature that is Stephen Colbert — a caricature that highlights how «we develop a built - in resistance to any information that refuses to fall in line with our preconceived notions.»

A clever choice by the Head of Department may lead to these plays being read in conjunction with Waugh, Greene, Spark and many other Catholic writers - we must pray that the opportunity will not be wasted in favour of an «easy» author considered more relevant to the students in question.

Where clarity of theological meaning is perhaps required, the author gives this in a highlighted boxed text and additionally provides a small amount of space for personal note making; each chapter closes with two or three questions to stimulate discussion and personal reflection.

The writings of Thomas Aquinas and the authors who inspired and succeeded him are ambiguous on the question: Are human beings to be defined by the characteristics which they share with other creatures or by the features which set them apart?

However, the question and the answer may have nothing to do with expressing what the author felt when it was written, felt after it was written, or interpreted it in the future.