Sentences with phrase «author argue»

Why does the author argue in favor of «guided practice»?

«Thus, the risks of potential «trade wars» and the potential negative impact on the global economy and on oil demand if these risks do materialise should constitute a serious concern for OPEC,» the authors argue.

What the media has to do now, the authors argue, is not try to fight this alternative ecosystem with better viral content or clickbait, but to «recognize that it is operating in a propaganda and disinformation - rich environment.»

The author argues that in order to see «real change» in the world «we need feminine energy in the management of the world.»

The authors argue that what others perceive as a mess might actually be the result of a system where the «more important, urgent work tends to stay close by and near the top of the clutter» and the less important papers «tends to get buried to the bottom or near the back,» CNN reported.

However, the authors argue that such crisis contingencies should include markets in their risk - sharing, which would require better coordination with institutions.

The authors argue that America's predisposition for favoring small business is not just misguided but has had a pernicious effect.

Blockchain would achieve those savings, the authors argued, by bypassing the existing international payment networks, which are slow and expensive.

What's needed instead, the authors argue, is better clarity around when banks could be forced to take back loans.

CAROL LOOMIS: In the conclusion of a book, Dear Chairman, which you recommend in this year's annual letter, a new book you recommend, the author argues that «the life's work of great investors is inevitably reabsorbed into the industrial complex with little acknowledgement of their accomplishments.

This author argues that they shouldn't, as «any blockchain that gets mired in governance wars is simply going to be left behind».

As for the claim that some narcissism is healthy in a competitive society, the authors argue that «it would be better for everyone not to concentrate on self - feelings — positive or negative — quite so much.»

The author argues that the view that the process account rests on experiences in some sense while other metaphysical and theological accounts do not, is at the very least thoroughly misleading, and at the very worst quite false.

The author argues that the doctrine of the Trinity is a useful unifying tool for witness.

After all, such unions are harmful in the same sense that the authors argue that implementation of the revisionist view is harmful, namely, by way of consequence.

The author argues that the meaning of the Bible's passages on homosexuality have been lost in translation.

The author argues that the United States ought to accept the provision for an International Criminal Court, as worked out in Rome in the summer of 1998 and agreed to by most of the nations participating in the discussions.

The author argues that only on the basis of the Christian dogmas of Creation and Incarnation could science have emerged in the Western world.

One such author argues that injustice can't be solved by accusing others of advantage in The Perils of Privilege.

Much of what the authors argue for here makes great sense» for example, injecting «a healthy dose of competition» into our educational system through the use of educational vouchers.

The authors argue for using our superior rational faculties to «say No» to our primitive impulses.

The author argues that in the Catholic - Buddhist dialogue this can lead to the discovery in ourselves of parts of our own tradition that lie dormant and untapped.

The author argues that the public schools ought not teach a value system and a world view contrary to the beliefs and values of the children's parents.

The author argues that we should not address the problem of illicit drugs as a war to be one, but as an epidemic to be checked, a disease to be cured.

The author argues for what he calls «the agrarian point of view» as regards the creation: It means taking seriously the Biblical mandate to care for the creation.

I remember one essay in particular; the author argued that we can not use subjective words such as «feminine» as a descriptor of women because, by very nature of womanhood, if you are a woman, then it is, in fact, regardless of stereotypes, feminine.

I read a book recently where the author argued the very thing you are saying and it made me think the same thing.

The authors argue that if we pay sufficient attention to the politics of hunger, all the people of the world can be fed.

The author argues that the electronically transmitted image will become the medium of greatest authority.

The author argues that we should reconceive concrescence itself as the active interweaving of efficient and final causation, understanding by efficient causation the entire career of physical feeling, not simply concentrating exclusively on its initial phase.

But the letter's authors argue that the Internet and hotels are different, with hotel owners directly profiting off the temptation of porn.

Anti-anti-Communism has further been sustained, the authors argue, by a revival of the thirties» tactic of «popular frontism.»

Once again, using descriptions found in the OT, the author argues that it was not only the old Covenant that was defective, but the whole of the ancient cult was ineffective.

The author argues to this position by using the texts of the OT itself.

Lincoln, the author argues, understood this most fully, and that understanding is of increasing importance in sustaining the American experiment.

Rather, the authors argue from various perspectives, reconciliation is an essential ingredient of justice.

«On the one hand, the authors argue that the financial stress caused by five new food and drink taxes can be counterbalanced by subsidising fruit and vegetables.

To make matters worse, the authors argue, the media ignores and / or severely criticizes research findings that don't fit the football = dementia narrative, and labels anyone who dares to challenge that narrative or call for further study a «CTE denier» or a «shill» trying to advance their own vested interests, confuse the public and conflate the issues.

The authors argue that instead of policies that just strengthen marriage — which more and more people are questioning, and rejecting, as a valid institution — we should be supporting all intimate relationships as well as enlarging the legal and social definitions of family to reflect the many types of families we have today.

The authors argue that a book - oriented home environment endows children with tools that are directly useful in learning at school.

The authors argue that public health strategy should therefore focus on making parents aware of specific hazardous co-sleeping environments to avoid: sofa - sharing, alcohol, drugs, smoking, or co-sleeping if the infant is pre-term.

The authors argue that species - specific sleep ecology involves close contact with a carer and frequent sleep arousals for the first 6 months of life.

The authors argue that the results of their work point to the long - term benefits of optimizing employee performance via flexibility offerings, despite potential short - term stigmatization.

In Paul Tough's new book How Children Succeed: Grit, Curiosity and the Hidden Power of Character, the author argues that the qualities that matter most to children's success, now and later in life, have more to do with character — and that parents and schools can play a powerful role in nurturing the character traits that foster success.

The author argues that the GCC governments, driven by economic weakness and future aspirations, started to invest in alternative sources to feed their economies, for example, partnerships with prestigious Western academic institutions.

Where Iraqi affairs are concerned, the author argues that the international sanctions and the containment heightened social tension and political pressure on Saddam's regime.

However, the author argues that the purpose of uniforms in modern international law is not to distinguish different armies, but only to distinguish combatants from civilians, as Protocol I, Article 48 says:

The principle authors argue that this basic settlement survived both the revisionism of Tony Crosland and the changes wrought by New Labour in the 1990s, contributing to the defeat of 2010, and the situation where Labour has alienated large swathes, not just of the middle class electorate, but of its traditional core working class vote as well.

Investment in public services has increased but productivity growth has actually fallen, the authors argue, leaving ministers to deal with social problems with «unimaginative, statist and authoritarian» solutions such as Asbos, CCTV or identity cards.

«Its essential message, «work sets you free», still has something serious to commend it», the author argued.