Sentences with phrase «author mean by»

Honesty and «integrity» sound like nice concepts, but what does this author mean by such terms as applies to the R.E. profession?

What does the author mean by this?

What does the author mean by «multicultural lens» and what is its importance in working with students from backgrounds different from your own?

The book's subtitle explains what the author means by the nonfunctional: «Ruins, Relics, Rarities, Rubbish, Uninhabited Places, and Hidden Treasures.»

Maybe you aren't clear on what the author means by it.

I'd love to know what the heck the author meant by that.

However, that is what the author means by «light».

Is this violent possibility what the authors mean by a «fundamentalist assertion», or are they implying something more?

But what exactly do the authors mean by minimalist parenting, was a question that I wondered.

After some of the students shared their quickwrites, Daryl led the class in a prereading discussion of what the author meant by a «murky ending» to the Persian Gulf War.

I don't know what the the authors meant by «hand - waving» argument so you'll have to ask them.

You are exploiting a highly semantic point (i.e., what the authors meant by «more than 3C»).

Not exact matches

In his book, The Lean Startup: How Today's Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses, author Eric Ries highlights how «startup success can be engineered by following the right process, which means it can be learned, which means it can be taught.»

Pivot, a term coined by The Lean Startup author Eric Ries that means «a change in strategy without a change in vision,» is the answer to building a successful mobile app.

The timeline is similar to one being pushed by Rep. Kevin Brady, the chair of the House Ways and Means Committee and the chief author of the House version of the tax legislation.

Martin Ford, author of The Rise of the Robots: Technology and the Rise of the Jobless Future, sounded the alarm about the increasing adoption of robots means that more routine and repetitive jobs like brick layers and some office work will be replaced by machines.

Bob Gilbreath is Chief Marketing Strategist of Bridge Worldwide, a WPP digital and relationship marketing agency, and author of the new book, The Next Evolution of Marketing: Connect with your Customers by Marketing with Meaning.

Popularized by Dave Ramsey, author of «The Total Money Makeover,» it means you prioritize your smallest debts first, regardless of interest rate.

The primary authors of the bill were the staff of the House Ways and Means Committee, led by chairman Kevin Brady (R - Texas).

About the author: JS Kim is the Managing Director and Founder of SmartKnowledgeU, a fiercely independent research, consulting and education firm that focuses on gold and silver asset investment strategies as a means of countering the damaging effects of rapidly devaluing fiat currencies worldwide and price - distorted stock market and asset bubbles created by Central Bankers.

BOOKS — LOSING CONTROL By Stephen D. King The world is witnessing a massive redistribution of wealth as the West learns it can no longer live beyond its means, says HSBC's group chief economist Stephen D. King, author of...

- revfeed promotes binarytilt - «Scam or not» review websites promote it, It would be fair to say some are written by binarytilt authors and some authors are just simply bribed (I mean they're human) and binarytilt seems to have lots of money.

Charles Hugh Smith, author of OfTwoMinds.com, explains his what he means by stating, No «Free Trade» - Only Darwinian Game of Trade.

Never - the-less, I am fascinated by biblical scholarship, the history of the early church, and at any rate think people should have the correct facts about what was written and what the original authors meant it to mean.

and by that i mean the clergymen, not the author of the article, i believe in the good faith you good people have with the loss of your loved ones... god bless

Authors are bound by their experiences, but that doesn't mean we should believe in the existence of made up creatures like Kraken, Cyclops, Pegasus or Spiderman.

The author, Keri wrote... We don't learn the meaning of our lives by discussing it.

Like a bipolar magnet, the Christian author today feels the pull of both forces: a fervent desire to communicate what gives life meaning counteracted by an artistic inclination toward self - expression, form and structure that any «message» might interrupt.

It is, like all of Calvinism's doctrines, not explicitly taught anywhere in scripture, but extrapolated by taking a few verses or partial verses out of context and granting them a meaning never intended by the authors.

The actions and events in this story should not be construed to mean promotion or approval of those actions in real - life situations by the author.»

As noted by Harvey Cox, the author of The Secular City, in an interview with Krista Tippett, secularist and religious sentiments will ultimately seesaw between one and the other — Yes, this is off topic, but to say that the Church will change drastically will ultimately mean that it'll take two steps back, then two steps forward, and so on.

There are unquestionably parts of the Bible where the real meaning intended by the author is not the plain literal sense of the words, and where an unintelligent insistence upon the literal sense stands in the way of a true understanding.

It is common for ancient authors to refer to beheading and the sword even when many of those they are speaking of were executed by other means.

When we read a letter or book, it is written word by word, line by line, chapter by chapter and when we get to the end, we hope to have the meaning that the author intended us to have.

The meaning of this chapter has been made «incarnate» by the author in a specific sequence of letters of a code whose variability has allowed him to arrange them in the pattern you see before you.

Claiming that there «had to be» an agent, which is a unsupported assumption, the author then automatically leaps to the conclusion that «God» (by which the author surely means the Judeo - Christian deity) had to be involved.

Steve... I think we're floggin» a dead horse here, but for what it's worth, understand that I'm not trying to convince you to think like I do, rather I wd hope that room wd be made for many theological differences.To think discuss and debate theology is well supported by the New Testament and history, and is perfectly within the bounds of what it means to engage our minds with the subject at hand.Theologians and biblical scholars have done this very thing for centuries, revealing a plethora of opinion on the evolving world of biblical studies.Many capable authors have written and debated the common themes as well as the differences between Paul, John, Jesus, the synoptics, etc..

Sci - Fi Author John C. Wright takes down a belligerent reviewer in style: The thrilling conclusion: An interviewer once asked me if my Christianity or my political philosophy would offend readers, by which he meant readers to the Left of Center.

the point of reading is not to restate the meaning intended by the author but to engage the text in creative thought, often by means of punning play with the text.

Perhaps that is part of what Schleiermacher meant by his famous statement that good interpretation means «to understand the author better than the author understands himself.»

The word «Christian» literally means «little Christ,» how does someone who acquires fame by bashing the belief of others (he may be a scholar but as the author noted, most people have only heard of him because of his uncouth mannerisms) come anywhere close to Jesus?

By means of the foregoing comparative analysis, I have tried to show that both authors in fact have the same purpose.

Most awkwardly, there are extended passages whose «literal» meaning may not be the meaning intended by the author.

This dual understanding means nothing more than «a duality of aspects» provided one understands by God something really other than oneself, the author of one's created uniqueness that can not be derived from within the world.

This does not mean, of course, that the author ever forgets or betrays his science; what it does mean is: that the reader's approach, and response, to these pages must of necessity be quite different from those demanded by the scientific works.

While the purpose of the authors in telling the story is clear, they have suggested its deeper meaning only by hints here and there.

And the author Bharucha explains, «If by Secularism we mean a total avoidance of religious matters, the secular weapons may not be enough» to fight Fundamentalism.

The author reviews a book by Stanley Hauerwas: When Hauerwas asserts that liberal Christians are those who take «humans, not God, as the center of Christian faith,» or when he says that one of «the most cherished conceits of modernity» is that «humans are the measure of all that is,» he reveals that he has not thought hard enough about what liberalism and modernity mean to their proponents.

This would appear to have been compiled by the author of the current words of absolution in the sacrament of Penance (with all its subordinate clauses); and does not provide any means of drawing breath.

From the Summa Theologjae we read «The author of Sacred Scripture is God, in whose power it is to signify his meaning, not by words only (as man also can do), but also by things in themselves» 1,1,10.