He is author of Understanding Common Core State Standards, senior
author of Content Knowledge: A Compendium of Standards and Benchmarks for K — 12 Education, and the author or coauthor of numerous reports and guides related to standards - based systems.
He is the author of Understanding Common Core State Standards, the senior
author of Content Knowledge: A Compendium of Standards and Benchmarks for K — 12 Education, and the author or coauthor of numerous reports and guides related to standards - based systems.
Not exact matches
Ken Olson, «Eusebius
of Caesarea Tradition and Innovations», Center for Hellenic Studies, distributed by Harvard University Press (2013), wrote «Both the language and the
content have close parallels in the work
of Eusebius
of Caesarea, who is the first
author to show any
knowledge of the text.
A material science journal has retracted a paper after learning the
authors took most
of the
content from a master's thesis — and added the
author as a co-
author without his
knowledge.
It is usually more efficient when the
authoring tool is intuitive enough for your internal editors with good
knowledge of your products and proven methods to work with the
content.
The
authors offer thin evidence
of whether their schools are in fact teaching and assessing
content knowledge and skills in the ways they promise.
With Google's gift to mankind
authors can make learning modules that are intuitive, persuasive, and effective while they acquire
knowledge and gain skills.If you are an after course craftsman, then Power Searching is all that you expect to come out
of design experts and
content geniuses that love doing their job and are getting paid lots
of money for doing it.There are a total
of six - 50 minute - classes.
emphasizing skills rather than
content, schools are responsible for «startling gaps in
knowledge» among students, many
of whom can not say when the Civil War took place or identify
authors such as Nathaniel Hawthorne and Jane Austen, according to a new
In «Foregrounding Equity in Teacher Education: Toward a Model
of Social Justice Pedagogical and
Content Knowledge,»
authors Jeanne Dyches
of Iowa State University and Ashley Boyd
of Washington State University lay out the theoretical model they call Social Justice Pedagogical and
Content Knowledge, or SJPACK.
In the interview, the
authors explain that since Lee Shulman's concept
of pedagogical
content knowledge (PCK) was introduced in the 1980s, it has thoroughly permeated teacher preparation, but it does not explicitly link PCK to equity concerns.
To improve principal
knowledge and preparation, the
authors of the report recommended that the state require early childhood education - specific education or experience before granting certification, develop and expand course
content at principal certification programs that focuses on pre-K, and provide more ongoing professional development for principals.
The
author followed the Mathematics TPACK (Technology, Pedagogy and
Content Knowledge) Framework (Association
of Mathematics Educators, 2009) to structure an action research project in her classroom.
As suggested by many
authors in the Handbook
of Technological Pedagogical
Content Knowledge (AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology, 2008), more research needs to examine the role
of teacher preparation programs teachers» beliefs (Niess, 2008), and specific student and school contexts (McCrory, 2008) regarding the nature and development
of TPACK.
The
authors suggest a variety
of reading and learning strategies that enhance reading to learn in three ways: activating prior
content knowledge, mastering vocabulary, and making sense
of unfamiliar text styles.
While the study's
authors bemoan the fact that none
of the assessments for prospective teachers demanded subject
knowledge at the college graduate level, they are quick to point out that a bachelor's degree alone may not certify that the prospective teacher's
content knowledge is relevant to teaching a K - 12 curriculum.
-- From the Foreword by Johnny W. Lott (04/22/2008) «The
authors contribute to the field by answering the question: How do I help my struggling students who hold a variety
of misconceptions or have limited prior
knowledge of the
content?»
The
authors also emphasize the notions that neither
content knowledge nor English language acquisition, both
of which are ever - present when working with ELL students, are (or should be) linear, rigid, and structured as they have been viewed historically.
(From the Foreword by Johnny W. Lott 2008-04-22) «The
authors contribute to the field by answering the question: How do I help my struggling students who hold a variety
of misconceptions or have limited prior
knowledge of the
content?»
And then for a third thing, I think
content strategy, which we kind
of touched on at the very, very beginning —
content strategy is something that a lot
of authors don't have a lot
of knowledge or experience about, but I think is really important for long - term platform building.
Ray Kurzweil, inventor and
author, presented the first keynote, «Early in the Twenty - First Century,
Knowledge and
Content will Underlie Everything
of Value.»
Inkubate, a new approach to the slush pile, is a website that will give
authors an access portal to upload any or all
of their manuscripts for free with the
knowledge that agents and publishers will be scouring the site's files looking for great literary
content; for a fee, that is, as the agents and publishers will be charged a subscription fee to be allowed to peruse the manuscripts.
«Integration
of Knowledge and Ideas» is the third band of standards, where students are to (1) «integrate and evaluate content presented in diverse media and formats, including visually and quantitatively, as well as in words»; (2) «delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, including the validity of the reasoning as well as the relevance and sufficiency of the evidence»; and (3) «analyze how two or more texts address similar themes or topics in order to build knowledge or to compare the approaches the authors tak
Knowledge and Ideas» is the third band
of standards, where students are to (1) «integrate and evaluate
content presented in diverse media and formats, including visually and quantitatively, as well as in words»; (2) «delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, including the validity
of the reasoning as well as the relevance and sufficiency
of the evidence»; and (3) «analyze how two or more texts address similar themes or topics in order to build
knowledge or to compare the approaches the authors tak
knowledge or to compare the approaches the
authors take.»
The
content for posts published in this blog is based on the
knowledge and writings
of several
of the most respected and knowledgeable professionals in the book publishing industry: people like Dan Poynter, founder and President
of ParaPublishing.com and
author of many books; Danny O. Snow, founder
of Unlimited Publishing, LLC; Marilyn Ross and Sue Collier, co-authors
of The Complete Guide to Self - Publishing; Karrie Ross, a book designer and branding specialist, Dana Lynn Smith, The Savvy Book Marketer; Karen Hodges Miller,
author of Finish Your Book and newly released Sell Your Book; and Bobbi Linkemer,
author of How to Write a Nonfiction Book.
The main reason is because wordpress allows
authors to be able to update
content easily from a dashboard without the need
of technical
knowledge.
Robin has a broad
knowledge of indie, academic and trade publishing and is an expert in
content creation and distribution, on - demand models, marketing and
author strategies.
Skills • Familiar with alt tagging for accessibility and SEO keyword integration • Superior grammar, writing, proofreading, and editing skills • Proficient in digital tools, including track changes in Microsoft Office, G Suite by Google,
content management systems, digital
authoring tools, workflow applications • Strong
knowledge of Chicago Manual
of Style, AP Style, and The Yahoo! Style Guide • Deep familiarity with adapting to in - house style guides and making style decisions for inclusion in style guide • Excellent oral and written communication skills
Two reviewers will independently assess the suitability
of the preference - based instruments for measuring outcomes in palliative care using the ISOQOL, minimum standards for patient - reported outcome measures (conceptual and measurement model, reliability,
content validity, construct validity, responsiveness, interpretability
of scores, translation
of measure, patient and investigator burden), 43 and the CREATE checklist (descriptive system, health states values, sampling, preference data collection, study sample, modelling, scoring algorithm).44 The ISOQOL minimum standards were chosen as these standards were developed from a systematic review
of published and unpublished guidance on patient - reported outcome measures, including the COnsensus - based Standards for the selection
of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN).46 To the
authors»
knowledge, the CREATE checklist is the only published guidance on what key components should be reported in a valuation study.44 Information on how the contents
of the instruments were developed, psychometric properties and valuation will be used to assess the suitability
of the instruments for the palliative setting; instruments will be scored on whether the domains or dimensions were developed using input from informal caregivers
of people receiving palliative care (yes / no) and whether each
of the reporting checklist items has been evaluated for this population (if yes, then a score
of one will be allocated) and a total score calculated.